The evidence admission criteria

Judicial truth, a prerequisite for a just decision, cannot be pursued without limits. Evidentiary norms aim to protect chiefly fundamental rights and the criteria of procedural rationality, respecting the reasonable time duration of the trial. The assessment of evidence submission is successful when...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Giulio Ubertis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal 2021-03-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/517
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849693197947633664
author Giulio Ubertis
author_facet Giulio Ubertis
author_sort Giulio Ubertis
collection DOAJ
description Judicial truth, a prerequisite for a just decision, cannot be pursued without limits. Evidentiary norms aim to protect chiefly fundamental rights and the criteria of procedural rationality, respecting the reasonable time duration of the trial. The assessment of evidence submission is successful when the evidentiary theme is possible and pertinent, and where the means and / or sources of evidence are relevant in the threefold sense of their necessity (i.e. of their non-redundancy), of their content fitness (in that they can serve to verify the statement to be proved) and of their epistemological fitness (as the activity performed complies with the historically given gnoseological parameters). Finally, it is clarified that the use of artificial intelligence must likewise guarantee meaningful human control.
format Article
id doaj-art-c377f67fce654c3aba649acf933cb9bb
institution DOAJ
issn 2525-510X
language English
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal
record_format Article
series Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
spelling doaj-art-c377f67fce654c3aba649acf933cb9bb2025-08-20T03:20:30ZengInstituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual PenalRevista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal2525-510X2021-03-017110.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.517214The evidence admission criteriaGiulio Ubertis0Università Cattolica del Sacro cuore di Milano,Judicial truth, a prerequisite for a just decision, cannot be pursued without limits. Evidentiary norms aim to protect chiefly fundamental rights and the criteria of procedural rationality, respecting the reasonable time duration of the trial. The assessment of evidence submission is successful when the evidentiary theme is possible and pertinent, and where the means and / or sources of evidence are relevant in the threefold sense of their necessity (i.e. of their non-redundancy), of their content fitness (in that they can serve to verify the statement to be proved) and of their epistemological fitness (as the activity performed complies with the historically given gnoseological parameters). Finally, it is clarified that the use of artificial intelligence must likewise guarantee meaningful human control.http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/517ammissione probatoriaintelligenza artificialepertinenzaprova scientificarilevanzaverità giudizialeverosimiglianza.
spellingShingle Giulio Ubertis
The evidence admission criteria
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
ammissione probatoria
intelligenza artificiale
pertinenza
prova scientifica
rilevanza
verità giudiziale
verosimiglianza.
title The evidence admission criteria
title_full The evidence admission criteria
title_fullStr The evidence admission criteria
title_full_unstemmed The evidence admission criteria
title_short The evidence admission criteria
title_sort evidence admission criteria
topic ammissione probatoria
intelligenza artificiale
pertinenza
prova scientifica
rilevanza
verità giudiziale
verosimiglianza.
url http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/517
work_keys_str_mv AT giulioubertis theevidenceadmissioncriteria
AT giulioubertis evidenceadmissioncriteria