The Venice Charter – between protection and socially useful purpose.
The principles of the Venice Charter are still invoked worldwide as a crucial reference point in discussions and practices related to heritage preservation. However, the Charter’s lack of clarity in defining stakeholders and procedural steps raises significant issues about who has the authority to...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Lublin University of Technology
2024-10-01
|
| Series: | Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/odk/article/view/6161 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849245207935057920 |
|---|---|
| author | Iuliia Eremenko Tymoteusz Kraski |
| author_facet | Iuliia Eremenko Tymoteusz Kraski |
| author_sort | Iuliia Eremenko |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
The principles of the Venice Charter are still invoked worldwide as a crucial reference point in discussions and practices related to heritage preservation. However, the Charter’s lack of clarity in defining stakeholders and procedural steps raises significant issues about who has the authority to determine the appropriateness of new functions for monuments. This deficiency can lead to decision-making that might not fully consider the diverse cultural values and historical significance of the sites, potentially resulting in conservation outcomes that are more economically than socially driven. This paper examines how national and international conservation policies have expanded upon the Venice Charter to address social participation and the concept of "socially useful purposes" in World Heritage site management. Focusing on Germany and Poland World Heritage cities, the study explores how national and international guidelines have expanded upon the Venice Charter to incorporate social participation and the concept of "socially useful purposes" in the management of World Heritage sites. It delves into the role of Site Management Plans as dynamic documents that have evolved from strict preservation frameworks to policies encompassing social participation, thereby enhancing community engagement and meeting a broader spectrum of conservation needs and stakeholder interests.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c362ce56d47246fd8a8b274cf6fb0ee0 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2543-6422 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-10-01 |
| publisher | Lublin University of Technology |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego |
| spelling | doaj-art-c362ce56d47246fd8a8b274cf6fb0ee02025-08-20T03:58:54ZengLublin University of TechnologyOchrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego2543-64222024-10-012010.35784/odk.6161The Venice Charter – between protection and socially useful purpose.Iuliia Eremenko0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8024-6611Tymoteusz Kraski1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9047-4469University of WarsawUniversity of Warsaw The principles of the Venice Charter are still invoked worldwide as a crucial reference point in discussions and practices related to heritage preservation. However, the Charter’s lack of clarity in defining stakeholders and procedural steps raises significant issues about who has the authority to determine the appropriateness of new functions for monuments. This deficiency can lead to decision-making that might not fully consider the diverse cultural values and historical significance of the sites, potentially resulting in conservation outcomes that are more economically than socially driven. This paper examines how national and international conservation policies have expanded upon the Venice Charter to address social participation and the concept of "socially useful purposes" in World Heritage site management. Focusing on Germany and Poland World Heritage cities, the study explores how national and international guidelines have expanded upon the Venice Charter to incorporate social participation and the concept of "socially useful purposes" in the management of World Heritage sites. It delves into the role of Site Management Plans as dynamic documents that have evolved from strict preservation frameworks to policies encompassing social participation, thereby enhancing community engagement and meeting a broader spectrum of conservation needs and stakeholder interests. https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/odk/article/view/6161cultural heritageVenice Charteradaptation of historic monuments and sitesparticipation |
| spellingShingle | Iuliia Eremenko Tymoteusz Kraski The Venice Charter – between protection and socially useful purpose. Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego cultural heritage Venice Charter adaptation of historic monuments and sites participation |
| title | The Venice Charter – between protection and socially useful purpose. |
| title_full | The Venice Charter – between protection and socially useful purpose. |
| title_fullStr | The Venice Charter – between protection and socially useful purpose. |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Venice Charter – between protection and socially useful purpose. |
| title_short | The Venice Charter – between protection and socially useful purpose. |
| title_sort | venice charter between protection and socially useful purpose |
| topic | cultural heritage Venice Charter adaptation of historic monuments and sites participation |
| url | https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/odk/article/view/6161 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT iuliiaeremenko thevenicecharterbetweenprotectionandsociallyusefulpurpose AT tymoteuszkraski thevenicecharterbetweenprotectionandsociallyusefulpurpose AT iuliiaeremenko venicecharterbetweenprotectionandsociallyusefulpurpose AT tymoteuszkraski venicecharterbetweenprotectionandsociallyusefulpurpose |