Assessing Physical Therapists’ Expectations and Experiences With an Automated Rehabilitation System Using Technology Acceptance Model: Multiple Methods Pilot Study

Abstract BackgroundWearable sensor systems maximize visual and clinical feedback for physical therapists to enhance patient outcomes in rehabilitation medicine. However, physical therapists must adopt and accept new technologies for full integration into routine care to advanc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cynthia Williams, Lindsay Toth, Raine Osborne, Chloe E Bailey, Aishwarya Joshi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2025-08-01
Series:JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
Online Access:https://rehab.jmir.org/2025/1/e67440
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849225128280326144
author Cynthia Williams
Lindsay Toth
Raine Osborne
Chloe E Bailey
Aishwarya Joshi
author_facet Cynthia Williams
Lindsay Toth
Raine Osborne
Chloe E Bailey
Aishwarya Joshi
author_sort Cynthia Williams
collection DOAJ
description Abstract BackgroundWearable sensor systems maximize visual and clinical feedback for physical therapists to enhance patient outcomes in rehabilitation medicine. However, physical therapists must adopt and accept new technologies for full integration into routine care to advance the use of technology in clinical care. Their role in technology design is critical in adopting and implementing technology. Interprofessional collaboration should be supported in the design of rehabilitation-assisted technologies. ObjectiveWe used the established tenets of the Technology Acceptance Model to describe physical therapists’ expectations and experiences before and after using a novel wearable system in outpatient physical therapy. MethodsThis multiple methods pilot study used a comparative pre-post survey and a qualitative semistructured focus group study design. Using purposive sampling, we recruited outpatient physical therapists to pilot the novel wearable technology, describe their expectations and experiences, and participate in a semistructured focus group discussion conducted to gather training and user experience information. ResultsThe study sample consisted of 5 physical therapists with an average age of 38.8 (SD 6.9) years and a work experience average of 12 (SD 7.7) years. Presurvey data show favorable expectations for usefulness and ease of use; however, favorability in both factors decreased after use. For perceived usefulness, all responses moved in the less favorable direction; mean difference −4.4 (SD 3.21); PPP ConclusionsThe Technology Acceptance Model–based survey responses and focus group themes outcomes demonstrated that physical therapists’ expectations for using new technology were not met. Engaging physical therapists in piloting novel wearable technology highlights the importance of physical therapist engagement in developing, refining, and implementing wearable devices for rehabilitation.
format Article
id doaj-art-c33cdb31f069493db1b822dfd75ab859
institution Kabale University
issn 2369-2529
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
spelling doaj-art-c33cdb31f069493db1b822dfd75ab8592025-08-25T06:06:23ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies2369-25292025-08-0112e67440e6744010.2196/67440Assessing Physical Therapists’ Expectations and Experiences With an Automated Rehabilitation System Using Technology Acceptance Model: Multiple Methods Pilot StudyCynthia Williamshttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-8344-7427Lindsay Tothhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-5856-2012Raine Osbornehttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-1002-1310Chloe E Baileyhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-9306-1843Aishwarya Joshihttp://orcid.org/0009-0007-8316-5431 Abstract BackgroundWearable sensor systems maximize visual and clinical feedback for physical therapists to enhance patient outcomes in rehabilitation medicine. However, physical therapists must adopt and accept new technologies for full integration into routine care to advance the use of technology in clinical care. Their role in technology design is critical in adopting and implementing technology. Interprofessional collaboration should be supported in the design of rehabilitation-assisted technologies. ObjectiveWe used the established tenets of the Technology Acceptance Model to describe physical therapists’ expectations and experiences before and after using a novel wearable system in outpatient physical therapy. MethodsThis multiple methods pilot study used a comparative pre-post survey and a qualitative semistructured focus group study design. Using purposive sampling, we recruited outpatient physical therapists to pilot the novel wearable technology, describe their expectations and experiences, and participate in a semistructured focus group discussion conducted to gather training and user experience information. ResultsThe study sample consisted of 5 physical therapists with an average age of 38.8 (SD 6.9) years and a work experience average of 12 (SD 7.7) years. Presurvey data show favorable expectations for usefulness and ease of use; however, favorability in both factors decreased after use. For perceived usefulness, all responses moved in the less favorable direction; mean difference −4.4 (SD 3.21); PPP ConclusionsThe Technology Acceptance Model–based survey responses and focus group themes outcomes demonstrated that physical therapists’ expectations for using new technology were not met. Engaging physical therapists in piloting novel wearable technology highlights the importance of physical therapist engagement in developing, refining, and implementing wearable devices for rehabilitation.https://rehab.jmir.org/2025/1/e67440
spellingShingle Cynthia Williams
Lindsay Toth
Raine Osborne
Chloe E Bailey
Aishwarya Joshi
Assessing Physical Therapists’ Expectations and Experiences With an Automated Rehabilitation System Using Technology Acceptance Model: Multiple Methods Pilot Study
JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
title Assessing Physical Therapists’ Expectations and Experiences With an Automated Rehabilitation System Using Technology Acceptance Model: Multiple Methods Pilot Study
title_full Assessing Physical Therapists’ Expectations and Experiences With an Automated Rehabilitation System Using Technology Acceptance Model: Multiple Methods Pilot Study
title_fullStr Assessing Physical Therapists’ Expectations and Experiences With an Automated Rehabilitation System Using Technology Acceptance Model: Multiple Methods Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Physical Therapists’ Expectations and Experiences With an Automated Rehabilitation System Using Technology Acceptance Model: Multiple Methods Pilot Study
title_short Assessing Physical Therapists’ Expectations and Experiences With an Automated Rehabilitation System Using Technology Acceptance Model: Multiple Methods Pilot Study
title_sort assessing physical therapists expectations and experiences with an automated rehabilitation system using technology acceptance model multiple methods pilot study
url https://rehab.jmir.org/2025/1/e67440
work_keys_str_mv AT cynthiawilliams assessingphysicaltherapistsexpectationsandexperienceswithanautomatedrehabilitationsystemusingtechnologyacceptancemodelmultiplemethodspilotstudy
AT lindsaytoth assessingphysicaltherapistsexpectationsandexperienceswithanautomatedrehabilitationsystemusingtechnologyacceptancemodelmultiplemethodspilotstudy
AT raineosborne assessingphysicaltherapistsexpectationsandexperienceswithanautomatedrehabilitationsystemusingtechnologyacceptancemodelmultiplemethodspilotstudy
AT chloeebailey assessingphysicaltherapistsexpectationsandexperienceswithanautomatedrehabilitationsystemusingtechnologyacceptancemodelmultiplemethodspilotstudy
AT aishwaryajoshi assessingphysicaltherapistsexpectationsandexperienceswithanautomatedrehabilitationsystemusingtechnologyacceptancemodelmultiplemethodspilotstudy