Economic evaluation and sensitivity analysis of some fuel oil upgrading processes

Seven upgrading schemes, identified as high distillate production schemes have been proposed for upgrading of 3.50 × 106 t/y atmospheric residues. The seven schemes were evaluated using the discounting cash flow method. Economic parameters such as internal rate of return, IRR, payback period, PBP an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seham A. El-Temtamy, Tahani S. Gendy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute 2014-12-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Petroleum
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110062114000671
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849765445640388608
author Seham A. El-Temtamy
Tahani S. Gendy
author_facet Seham A. El-Temtamy
Tahani S. Gendy
author_sort Seham A. El-Temtamy
collection DOAJ
description Seven upgrading schemes, identified as high distillate production schemes have been proposed for upgrading of 3.50 × 106 t/y atmospheric residues. The seven schemes were evaluated using the discounting cash flow method. Economic parameters such as internal rate of return, IRR, payback period, PBP and net present value, NPV have been calculated for each option. All studied schemes proved profitable with IRR ranging between 25.2 and 33.7% with option 7 having the highest NPV, IRR and payback period. Sensitivity analyses were performed on this option. The parameters investigated are: sales price (Revenue); production rate (feed weight); feed cost; utilities cost; direct and indirect costs; tax% and discount rate%. Their impact on NPV and %IRR has been evaluated. Tornado diagrams were constructed to illustrate the effect of variation of different cost parameters on NPV and IRR. The single most effective input variable is Revenue on both NPV and IRR. With two-factor sensitivity analysis, the two most important input variables for NPV and IRR are revenue and utilities. Spider charts for option 7 have been created to show how the model’s outputs depend on the percentage changes for each of the model’s input variables.
format Article
id doaj-art-c2fea58cb32f4f7883c32320652d9bfd
institution DOAJ
issn 1110-0621
language English
publishDate 2014-12-01
publisher Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute
record_format Article
series Egyptian Journal of Petroleum
spelling doaj-art-c2fea58cb32f4f7883c32320652d9bfd2025-08-20T03:04:51ZengEgyptian Petroleum Research InstituteEgyptian Journal of Petroleum1110-06212014-12-0123439740710.1016/j.ejpe.2014.09.008Economic evaluation and sensitivity analysis of some fuel oil upgrading processesSeham A. El-TemtamyTahani S. GendySeven upgrading schemes, identified as high distillate production schemes have been proposed for upgrading of 3.50 × 106 t/y atmospheric residues. The seven schemes were evaluated using the discounting cash flow method. Economic parameters such as internal rate of return, IRR, payback period, PBP and net present value, NPV have been calculated for each option. All studied schemes proved profitable with IRR ranging between 25.2 and 33.7% with option 7 having the highest NPV, IRR and payback period. Sensitivity analyses were performed on this option. The parameters investigated are: sales price (Revenue); production rate (feed weight); feed cost; utilities cost; direct and indirect costs; tax% and discount rate%. Their impact on NPV and %IRR has been evaluated. Tornado diagrams were constructed to illustrate the effect of variation of different cost parameters on NPV and IRR. The single most effective input variable is Revenue on both NPV and IRR. With two-factor sensitivity analysis, the two most important input variables for NPV and IRR are revenue and utilities. Spider charts for option 7 have been created to show how the model’s outputs depend on the percentage changes for each of the model’s input variables.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110062114000671Upgrading of fuel oilResidue catalytic crackingHydrocrackingCokingFeasibility studiesSensitivity analyses
spellingShingle Seham A. El-Temtamy
Tahani S. Gendy
Economic evaluation and sensitivity analysis of some fuel oil upgrading processes
Egyptian Journal of Petroleum
Upgrading of fuel oil
Residue catalytic cracking
Hydrocracking
Coking
Feasibility studies
Sensitivity analyses
title Economic evaluation and sensitivity analysis of some fuel oil upgrading processes
title_full Economic evaluation and sensitivity analysis of some fuel oil upgrading processes
title_fullStr Economic evaluation and sensitivity analysis of some fuel oil upgrading processes
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation and sensitivity analysis of some fuel oil upgrading processes
title_short Economic evaluation and sensitivity analysis of some fuel oil upgrading processes
title_sort economic evaluation and sensitivity analysis of some fuel oil upgrading processes
topic Upgrading of fuel oil
Residue catalytic cracking
Hydrocracking
Coking
Feasibility studies
Sensitivity analyses
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110062114000671
work_keys_str_mv AT sehamaeltemtamy economicevaluationandsensitivityanalysisofsomefueloilupgradingprocesses
AT tahanisgendy economicevaluationandsensitivityanalysisofsomefueloilupgradingprocesses