Evaluation of ctDNA-guided adjuvant therapy de-escalation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a comparative cohort study

BackgroundWhile circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assessment after surgery has emerged as a promising biomarker for minimal residual disease detection in solid tumors, its clinical utility for guiding the selection between postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) in head and neck...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xu Zhang, Qigen Fang, Junhui Yuan, Liyuan Dai, Ruihua Luo, Tao Huang, Yinfei Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1576042/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849392499136659456
author Xu Zhang
Qigen Fang
Junhui Yuan
Liyuan Dai
Ruihua Luo
Tao Huang
Tao Huang
Yinfei Wu
author_facet Xu Zhang
Qigen Fang
Junhui Yuan
Liyuan Dai
Ruihua Luo
Tao Huang
Tao Huang
Yinfei Wu
author_sort Xu Zhang
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundWhile circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assessment after surgery has emerged as a promising biomarker for minimal residual disease detection in solid tumors, its clinical utility for guiding the selection between postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains poorly characterized. We evaluated whether ctDNA-directed stratification could optimize locoregional control in HNSCC patients following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.MethodsIn this comparative cohort study, consecutive HNSCC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy were stratified into two management groups: a ctDNA-guided cohort where tumor-informed ctDNA testing determined POCRT administration given only for detectable ctDNA, and a traditional cohort where all patients received PORT, with postoperative chemotherapy decisions made by multidisciplinary team review based on pathologic response status and pretreatment imaging findings. The primary endpoint was 3-year locoregional control, with secondary analysis of POCRT utilization rates.ResultsAmong 257 patients who completed neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, 209 (81.3%) underwent surgery with 187 (72.8% of treated patients) achieving major pathological response and comprising our study population. Of these, 69 (36.9%) received ctDNA-guided management, while 118 (63.1%) followed traditional protocols. POCRT utilization was significantly lower in the ctDNA-guided group (27.5% [19/69] vs 42.4% [50/118]; absolute difference -14.9%, p=0.042). ctDNA positivity rates were comparable between groups (ctDNA-guided: 27.5% [19/69] vs traditional: 29.6% [35/118], p=0.867). ctDNA-guided management demonstrated superior outcomes, with a 15% reduction in locoregional recurrence risk (adjusted HR 0.85, 95%CI 0.70-0.94; p=0.013) versus traditional management. Among ctDNA-positive patients, POCRT benefit was significantly greater in the ctDNA-guided cohort (HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.57-0.83; p=0.026) compared to ctDNA-positive patients receiving traditional management (HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.73-0.93; p=0.047; interaction p=0.039).ConclusionPostoperative ctDNA analysis identifies HNSCC patients who benefit most from POCRT, enabling a 41% relative reduction in treatment utilization while maintaining superior locoregional control. The enhanced therapeutic effect observed in ctDNA-guided patients supports ctDNA’s role as a decision-modifying biomarker for personalization management following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.
format Article
id doaj-art-c2dca5ed426a4a848fdca18c30538d60
institution Kabale University
issn 1664-3224
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Immunology
spelling doaj-art-c2dca5ed426a4a848fdca18c30538d602025-08-20T03:40:46ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242025-08-011610.3389/fimmu.2025.15760421576042Evaluation of ctDNA-guided adjuvant therapy de-escalation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a comparative cohort studyXu Zhang0Qigen Fang1Junhui Yuan2Liyuan Dai3Ruihua Luo4Tao Huang5Tao Huang6Yinfei Wu7Department of Head Neck and Thyroid, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Head Neck and Thyroid, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Head Neck and Thyroid, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Head Neck and Thyroid, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Breast, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, ChinaMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United StatesHealth Management Center, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, ChinaBackgroundWhile circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assessment after surgery has emerged as a promising biomarker for minimal residual disease detection in solid tumors, its clinical utility for guiding the selection between postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains poorly characterized. We evaluated whether ctDNA-directed stratification could optimize locoregional control in HNSCC patients following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.MethodsIn this comparative cohort study, consecutive HNSCC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy were stratified into two management groups: a ctDNA-guided cohort where tumor-informed ctDNA testing determined POCRT administration given only for detectable ctDNA, and a traditional cohort where all patients received PORT, with postoperative chemotherapy decisions made by multidisciplinary team review based on pathologic response status and pretreatment imaging findings. The primary endpoint was 3-year locoregional control, with secondary analysis of POCRT utilization rates.ResultsAmong 257 patients who completed neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, 209 (81.3%) underwent surgery with 187 (72.8% of treated patients) achieving major pathological response and comprising our study population. Of these, 69 (36.9%) received ctDNA-guided management, while 118 (63.1%) followed traditional protocols. POCRT utilization was significantly lower in the ctDNA-guided group (27.5% [19/69] vs 42.4% [50/118]; absolute difference -14.9%, p=0.042). ctDNA positivity rates were comparable between groups (ctDNA-guided: 27.5% [19/69] vs traditional: 29.6% [35/118], p=0.867). ctDNA-guided management demonstrated superior outcomes, with a 15% reduction in locoregional recurrence risk (adjusted HR 0.85, 95%CI 0.70-0.94; p=0.013) versus traditional management. Among ctDNA-positive patients, POCRT benefit was significantly greater in the ctDNA-guided cohort (HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.57-0.83; p=0.026) compared to ctDNA-positive patients receiving traditional management (HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.73-0.93; p=0.047; interaction p=0.039).ConclusionPostoperative ctDNA analysis identifies HNSCC patients who benefit most from POCRT, enabling a 41% relative reduction in treatment utilization while maintaining superior locoregional control. The enhanced therapeutic effect observed in ctDNA-guided patients supports ctDNA’s role as a decision-modifying biomarker for personalization management following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1576042/fullhead and neck squamous cell carcinomaCtDNAneoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapyadjuvant chemotherapypathologic complete response
spellingShingle Xu Zhang
Qigen Fang
Junhui Yuan
Liyuan Dai
Ruihua Luo
Tao Huang
Tao Huang
Yinfei Wu
Evaluation of ctDNA-guided adjuvant therapy de-escalation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a comparative cohort study
Frontiers in Immunology
head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
CtDNA
neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy
adjuvant chemotherapy
pathologic complete response
title Evaluation of ctDNA-guided adjuvant therapy de-escalation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a comparative cohort study
title_full Evaluation of ctDNA-guided adjuvant therapy de-escalation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a comparative cohort study
title_fullStr Evaluation of ctDNA-guided adjuvant therapy de-escalation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a comparative cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of ctDNA-guided adjuvant therapy de-escalation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a comparative cohort study
title_short Evaluation of ctDNA-guided adjuvant therapy de-escalation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a comparative cohort study
title_sort evaluation of ctdna guided adjuvant therapy de escalation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma a comparative cohort study
topic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
CtDNA
neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy
adjuvant chemotherapy
pathologic complete response
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1576042/full
work_keys_str_mv AT xuzhang evaluationofctdnaguidedadjuvanttherapydeescalationinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaacomparativecohortstudy
AT qigenfang evaluationofctdnaguidedadjuvanttherapydeescalationinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaacomparativecohortstudy
AT junhuiyuan evaluationofctdnaguidedadjuvanttherapydeescalationinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaacomparativecohortstudy
AT liyuandai evaluationofctdnaguidedadjuvanttherapydeescalationinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaacomparativecohortstudy
AT ruihualuo evaluationofctdnaguidedadjuvanttherapydeescalationinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaacomparativecohortstudy
AT taohuang evaluationofctdnaguidedadjuvanttherapydeescalationinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaacomparativecohortstudy
AT taohuang evaluationofctdnaguidedadjuvanttherapydeescalationinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaacomparativecohortstudy
AT yinfeiwu evaluationofctdnaguidedadjuvanttherapydeescalationinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaacomparativecohortstudy