The reverse dorsal metacarpal artery flap in finger reconstruction: A reliable choice

Background: The finger skin and soft-tissue defects are reconstructive challenges due to their nature and the intricate extensor apparatus and flexors it protects. The reverse dorsal metacarpal artery (RDMA) is a time-tested option for the reconstruction of the same. Materials and Methods: A total o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jyoshid R. Balan, Shaji Mathew, Pradeep Kumar, Harsh Vardhan, Anto Francis, V. G. Aniljith, Raj Gopal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2018-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.4103/ijps.IJPS_37_17
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849685123342008320
author Jyoshid R. Balan
Shaji Mathew
Pradeep Kumar
Harsh Vardhan
Anto Francis
V. G. Aniljith
Raj Gopal
author_facet Jyoshid R. Balan
Shaji Mathew
Pradeep Kumar
Harsh Vardhan
Anto Francis
V. G. Aniljith
Raj Gopal
author_sort Jyoshid R. Balan
collection DOAJ
description Background: The finger skin and soft-tissue defects are reconstructive challenges due to their nature and the intricate extensor apparatus and flexors it protects. The reverse dorsal metacarpal artery (RDMA) is a time-tested option for the reconstruction of the same. Materials and Methods: A total of 14 cases of RDMA flap for finger defects involving proximal to distal phalanx were performed. Thirteen of these patients were male and one patient female and the most common mode of injury was occupational in nature followed by road traffic accident. The overall appearance was assessed for the flap and the donor site. The associated injuries and the range of motion were noted. Results: All but one flap survived completely. One patient had partial distal flap loss, which was tackled with split-thickness skin grafting. The flap size varied from 3.5 cm × 1.5 cm to 9 cm × 2 cm with mean of 6.64 cm × 1.72 cm. The mean age of the patients was 33.4 years. All the patients had acceptable aesthesis. The donor site had no complications and healed with linear scar. Conclusions: RDMA flap is a reliable flap for finger defects reconstruction. The range of movement mainly depends on the associated injury rather than flap transfer alone and to prove this we require doing analysis of range of movement in patients with flap done alone or with associated injuries.
format Article
id doaj-art-c2c9f978aeb345d99b87d9ba51b75698
institution DOAJ
issn 0970-0358
1998-376X
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery
spelling doaj-art-c2c9f978aeb345d99b87d9ba51b756982025-08-20T03:23:15ZengThieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery0970-03581998-376X2018-01-01510105405910.4103/ijps.IJPS_37_17The reverse dorsal metacarpal artery flap in finger reconstruction: A reliable choiceJyoshid R. Balan0Shaji Mathew1Pradeep Kumar2Harsh Vardhan3Anto Francis4V. G. Aniljith5Raj Gopal6Sushrutha Institute of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Elite Mission Hospital, Thrissur, Kerala, IndiaSushrutha Institute of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Elite Mission Hospital, Thrissur, Kerala, IndiaSushrutha Institute of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Elite Mission Hospital, Thrissur, Kerala, IndiaSushrutha Institute of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Elite Mission Hospital, Thrissur, Kerala, IndiaSushrutha Institute of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Elite Mission Hospital, Thrissur, Kerala, IndiaSushrutha Institute of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Elite Mission Hospital, Thrissur, Kerala, IndiaSushrutha Institute of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Elite Mission Hospital, Thrissur, Kerala, IndiaBackground: The finger skin and soft-tissue defects are reconstructive challenges due to their nature and the intricate extensor apparatus and flexors it protects. The reverse dorsal metacarpal artery (RDMA) is a time-tested option for the reconstruction of the same. Materials and Methods: A total of 14 cases of RDMA flap for finger defects involving proximal to distal phalanx were performed. Thirteen of these patients were male and one patient female and the most common mode of injury was occupational in nature followed by road traffic accident. The overall appearance was assessed for the flap and the donor site. The associated injuries and the range of motion were noted. Results: All but one flap survived completely. One patient had partial distal flap loss, which was tackled with split-thickness skin grafting. The flap size varied from 3.5 cm × 1.5 cm to 9 cm × 2 cm with mean of 6.64 cm × 1.72 cm. The mean age of the patients was 33.4 years. All the patients had acceptable aesthesis. The donor site had no complications and healed with linear scar. Conclusions: RDMA flap is a reliable flap for finger defects reconstruction. The range of movement mainly depends on the associated injury rather than flap transfer alone and to prove this we require doing analysis of range of movement in patients with flap done alone or with associated injuries.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.4103/ijps.IJPS_37_17aesthesisfinger defectsreconstructionreverse dorsal metacarpal artery flap
spellingShingle Jyoshid R. Balan
Shaji Mathew
Pradeep Kumar
Harsh Vardhan
Anto Francis
V. G. Aniljith
Raj Gopal
The reverse dorsal metacarpal artery flap in finger reconstruction: A reliable choice
Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery
aesthesis
finger defects
reconstruction
reverse dorsal metacarpal artery flap
title The reverse dorsal metacarpal artery flap in finger reconstruction: A reliable choice
title_full The reverse dorsal metacarpal artery flap in finger reconstruction: A reliable choice
title_fullStr The reverse dorsal metacarpal artery flap in finger reconstruction: A reliable choice
title_full_unstemmed The reverse dorsal metacarpal artery flap in finger reconstruction: A reliable choice
title_short The reverse dorsal metacarpal artery flap in finger reconstruction: A reliable choice
title_sort reverse dorsal metacarpal artery flap in finger reconstruction a reliable choice
topic aesthesis
finger defects
reconstruction
reverse dorsal metacarpal artery flap
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.4103/ijps.IJPS_37_17
work_keys_str_mv AT jyoshidrbalan thereversedorsalmetacarpalarteryflapinfingerreconstructionareliablechoice
AT shajimathew thereversedorsalmetacarpalarteryflapinfingerreconstructionareliablechoice
AT pradeepkumar thereversedorsalmetacarpalarteryflapinfingerreconstructionareliablechoice
AT harshvardhan thereversedorsalmetacarpalarteryflapinfingerreconstructionareliablechoice
AT antofrancis thereversedorsalmetacarpalarteryflapinfingerreconstructionareliablechoice
AT vganiljith thereversedorsalmetacarpalarteryflapinfingerreconstructionareliablechoice
AT rajgopal thereversedorsalmetacarpalarteryflapinfingerreconstructionareliablechoice
AT jyoshidrbalan reversedorsalmetacarpalarteryflapinfingerreconstructionareliablechoice
AT shajimathew reversedorsalmetacarpalarteryflapinfingerreconstructionareliablechoice
AT pradeepkumar reversedorsalmetacarpalarteryflapinfingerreconstructionareliablechoice
AT harshvardhan reversedorsalmetacarpalarteryflapinfingerreconstructionareliablechoice
AT antofrancis reversedorsalmetacarpalarteryflapinfingerreconstructionareliablechoice
AT vganiljith reversedorsalmetacarpalarteryflapinfingerreconstructionareliablechoice
AT rajgopal reversedorsalmetacarpalarteryflapinfingerreconstructionareliablechoice