Ultrasound <i>vs.</i> x-ray: a new way for clinicians to track scoliosis progression?

This retrospective study, utilising prospectively collected data, investigates the use of spine ultrasound as an alternative method for assessing scoliosis, with the aim of reducing radiation exposure. We included 92 patients aged 10 to 16 years with suspected idiopathic scoliosis. Exclusion criter...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samra Pjanić, Goran Talić, Nikola Jevtić, Filip Golić, Ivan Soldatović, Nachiappan Chockalingam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PAGEPress Publications 2025-02-01
Series:European Journal of Translational Myology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.pagepressjournals.org/bam/article/view/13422
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850023169265500160
author Samra Pjanić
Goran Talić
Nikola Jevtić
Filip Golić
Ivan Soldatović
Nachiappan Chockalingam
author_facet Samra Pjanić
Goran Talić
Nikola Jevtić
Filip Golić
Ivan Soldatović
Nachiappan Chockalingam
author_sort Samra Pjanić
collection DOAJ
description This retrospective study, utilising prospectively collected data, investigates the use of spine ultrasound as an alternative method for assessing scoliosis, with the aim of reducing radiation exposure. We included 92 patients aged 10 to 16 years with suspected idiopathic scoliosis. Exclusion criteria were weight over 150 kg, metal implants, pre-existing conditions, secondary deformities, and cognitive impairments. Each patient underwent clinical assessment and full spine radiographs, followed by spine ultrasound using the Scolioscan® system. Unprocessed B-mode ultrasound images were analysed using automatic measurements. The correlation between Ultrasound Coronal Angle (UCA) and Radiographic Cobb Angle (RCA) was evaluated at initial and follow-up visits. Strong correlations were found between UCA and RCA, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.786 to 0.903 (p < 0.001). The regression formula showed good predictive accuracy for curve progression on follow-up radiographs. The best results were observed in females and in primary thoracic curves (r = 0.936, p < 0.001). Although only four patients exhibited true progression (≥5° increase in Cobb angle), changes in scoliotic angles were effectively detected using ultrasound. This study confirms the feasibility of unprocessed spine ultrasound for scoliosis monitoring in clinical settings. Automatic measurements without 3D reconstruction make ultrasound a practical tool for tracking progression. The regression model shows potential for predicting curve progression, although further validation is needed. These findings suggest spine ultrasound could reduce the need for radiographs, benefiting patients by minimising radiation exposure while providing reliable monitoring of scoliosis progression and treatment outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-c2864bb476af4fe89a60c5e708fe4658
institution DOAJ
issn 2037-7452
2037-7460
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher PAGEPress Publications
record_format Article
series European Journal of Translational Myology
spelling doaj-art-c2864bb476af4fe89a60c5e708fe46582025-08-20T03:01:28ZengPAGEPress PublicationsEuropean Journal of Translational Myology2037-74522037-74602025-02-0110.4081/ejtm.2025.13422Ultrasound <i>vs.</i> x-ray: a new way for clinicians to track scoliosis progression?Samra Pjanić0Goran Talić1Nikola Jevtić2Filip Golić3Ivan Soldatović4Nachiappan Chockalingam5Institute for Physical, Rehabilitation Medicine and Orthopedic Surgery Dr. Miroslav Zotović, Banja LukaInstitute for Physical, Rehabilitation Medicine and Orthopedic Surgery Dr. Miroslav Zotović, Banja LukaScolio Centar, Novi SadInstitute for Physical, Rehabilitation Medicine and Orthopedic Surgery Dr. Miroslav Zotović, Banja LukaFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, BeogradCentre for Biomechanics and Rehabilaition Technologies, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent This retrospective study, utilising prospectively collected data, investigates the use of spine ultrasound as an alternative method for assessing scoliosis, with the aim of reducing radiation exposure. We included 92 patients aged 10 to 16 years with suspected idiopathic scoliosis. Exclusion criteria were weight over 150 kg, metal implants, pre-existing conditions, secondary deformities, and cognitive impairments. Each patient underwent clinical assessment and full spine radiographs, followed by spine ultrasound using the Scolioscan® system. Unprocessed B-mode ultrasound images were analysed using automatic measurements. The correlation between Ultrasound Coronal Angle (UCA) and Radiographic Cobb Angle (RCA) was evaluated at initial and follow-up visits. Strong correlations were found between UCA and RCA, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.786 to 0.903 (p < 0.001). The regression formula showed good predictive accuracy for curve progression on follow-up radiographs. The best results were observed in females and in primary thoracic curves (r = 0.936, p < 0.001). Although only four patients exhibited true progression (≥5° increase in Cobb angle), changes in scoliotic angles were effectively detected using ultrasound. This study confirms the feasibility of unprocessed spine ultrasound for scoliosis monitoring in clinical settings. Automatic measurements without 3D reconstruction make ultrasound a practical tool for tracking progression. The regression model shows potential for predicting curve progression, although further validation is needed. These findings suggest spine ultrasound could reduce the need for radiographs, benefiting patients by minimising radiation exposure while providing reliable monitoring of scoliosis progression and treatment outcomes. https://www.pagepressjournals.org/bam/article/view/13422ScoliosisAdolescentultrasoundSpineidiopathic
spellingShingle Samra Pjanić
Goran Talić
Nikola Jevtić
Filip Golić
Ivan Soldatović
Nachiappan Chockalingam
Ultrasound <i>vs.</i> x-ray: a new way for clinicians to track scoliosis progression?
European Journal of Translational Myology
Scoliosis
Adolescent
ultrasound
Spine
idiopathic
title Ultrasound <i>vs.</i> x-ray: a new way for clinicians to track scoliosis progression?
title_full Ultrasound <i>vs.</i> x-ray: a new way for clinicians to track scoliosis progression?
title_fullStr Ultrasound <i>vs.</i> x-ray: a new way for clinicians to track scoliosis progression?
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound <i>vs.</i> x-ray: a new way for clinicians to track scoliosis progression?
title_short Ultrasound <i>vs.</i> x-ray: a new way for clinicians to track scoliosis progression?
title_sort ultrasound i vs i x ray a new way for clinicians to track scoliosis progression
topic Scoliosis
Adolescent
ultrasound
Spine
idiopathic
url https://www.pagepressjournals.org/bam/article/view/13422
work_keys_str_mv AT samrapjanic ultrasoundivsixrayanewwayforclinicianstotrackscoliosisprogression
AT gorantalic ultrasoundivsixrayanewwayforclinicianstotrackscoliosisprogression
AT nikolajevtic ultrasoundivsixrayanewwayforclinicianstotrackscoliosisprogression
AT filipgolic ultrasoundivsixrayanewwayforclinicianstotrackscoliosisprogression
AT ivansoldatovic ultrasoundivsixrayanewwayforclinicianstotrackscoliosisprogression
AT nachiappanchockalingam ultrasoundivsixrayanewwayforclinicianstotrackscoliosisprogression