Prelabour Caesarean Section following IVF/ICSI in Older-Term Nulliparous Women: Too Precious to Push?

Objective. To compare prelabour caesarean section (CS) rates in older nulliparous women with a term singleton baby in cephalic presentation conceiving spontaneously and through IVF/ICSI. When the latter women would ask for CS, how willing are gynaecologists to comply with that request? Methods. A po...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. Gillet, E. Martens, G. Martens, H. Cammu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2011-01-01
Series:Journal of Pregnancy
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/362518
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832549329930289152
author E. Gillet
E. Martens
G. Martens
H. Cammu
author_facet E. Gillet
E. Martens
G. Martens
H. Cammu
author_sort E. Gillet
collection DOAJ
description Objective. To compare prelabour caesarean section (CS) rates in older nulliparous women with a term singleton baby in cephalic presentation conceiving spontaneously and through IVF/ICSI. When the latter women would ask for CS, how willing are gynaecologists to comply with that request? Methods. A population-based retrospective (1995–2009) cohort study, conducted in Northern Belgium. A comparison of 1,866 nulliparous women pregnant after IVF/ICSI and 15,228 controls is made. An anonymous postal questionnaire is sent to all Belgian gynaecologists. Result. Both groups are comparable with respect to maternal age, gestational age, and birth weight. Prelabour CS is more often performed in women who conceived through IVF/ICSI compared to those who conceived spontaneously (9.2% versus 6.3%, P<0.001). One in five gynaecologists agrees with the maternal request. Conclusion. IVF/ICSI pregnancies in older nulliparous women more often end in a prelabour CS and a substantial number of gynaecologists go along with a nonmedical reason for CS.
format Article
id doaj-art-c2851cc11a7b4b68ab4dc49dec570578
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-2727
2090-2735
language English
publishDate 2011-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Pregnancy
spelling doaj-art-c2851cc11a7b4b68ab4dc49dec5705782025-02-03T06:11:38ZengWileyJournal of Pregnancy2090-27272090-27352011-01-01201110.1155/2011/362518362518Prelabour Caesarean Section following IVF/ICSI in Older-Term Nulliparous Women: Too Precious to Push?E. Gillet0E. Martens1G. Martens2H. Cammu3Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University Hospital, Vrije Universiteit (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, BelgiumThe Flemish Centre for the Study of Perinatal Epidemiology (SPE), Hallepoortlaan 27 B, 1060 Brussels, BelgiumThe Flemish Centre for the Study of Perinatal Epidemiology (SPE), Hallepoortlaan 27 B, 1060 Brussels, BelgiumDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University Hospital, Vrije Universiteit (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, BelgiumObjective. To compare prelabour caesarean section (CS) rates in older nulliparous women with a term singleton baby in cephalic presentation conceiving spontaneously and through IVF/ICSI. When the latter women would ask for CS, how willing are gynaecologists to comply with that request? Methods. A population-based retrospective (1995–2009) cohort study, conducted in Northern Belgium. A comparison of 1,866 nulliparous women pregnant after IVF/ICSI and 15,228 controls is made. An anonymous postal questionnaire is sent to all Belgian gynaecologists. Result. Both groups are comparable with respect to maternal age, gestational age, and birth weight. Prelabour CS is more often performed in women who conceived through IVF/ICSI compared to those who conceived spontaneously (9.2% versus 6.3%, P<0.001). One in five gynaecologists agrees with the maternal request. Conclusion. IVF/ICSI pregnancies in older nulliparous women more often end in a prelabour CS and a substantial number of gynaecologists go along with a nonmedical reason for CS.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/362518
spellingShingle E. Gillet
E. Martens
G. Martens
H. Cammu
Prelabour Caesarean Section following IVF/ICSI in Older-Term Nulliparous Women: Too Precious to Push?
Journal of Pregnancy
title Prelabour Caesarean Section following IVF/ICSI in Older-Term Nulliparous Women: Too Precious to Push?
title_full Prelabour Caesarean Section following IVF/ICSI in Older-Term Nulliparous Women: Too Precious to Push?
title_fullStr Prelabour Caesarean Section following IVF/ICSI in Older-Term Nulliparous Women: Too Precious to Push?
title_full_unstemmed Prelabour Caesarean Section following IVF/ICSI in Older-Term Nulliparous Women: Too Precious to Push?
title_short Prelabour Caesarean Section following IVF/ICSI in Older-Term Nulliparous Women: Too Precious to Push?
title_sort prelabour caesarean section following ivf icsi in older term nulliparous women too precious to push
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/362518
work_keys_str_mv AT egillet prelabourcaesareansectionfollowingivficsiinoldertermnulliparouswomentooprecioustopush
AT emartens prelabourcaesareansectionfollowingivficsiinoldertermnulliparouswomentooprecioustopush
AT gmartens prelabourcaesareansectionfollowingivficsiinoldertermnulliparouswomentooprecioustopush
AT hcammu prelabourcaesareansectionfollowingivficsiinoldertermnulliparouswomentooprecioustopush