Clinical utility of diaphragmatic ultrasound for mechanical ventilator liberation in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Prolonged mechanical ventilation is associated with an increased incidence of complications and higher mortality rates. Therefore, it is crucial to wean patients from mechanical ventilation as soon as possible. Recently, diaphragmatic ultrasound has been used in this decision-mak...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naonori Tashiro, Hiroki Nishiwaki, Takashi Ikeda, William M. M. Levack, Hisashi Noma, Noyuri Yamaji, Erika Ota, Takeshi Hasegawa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:Journal of Intensive Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-025-00811-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849388301599899648
author Naonori Tashiro
Hiroki Nishiwaki
Takashi Ikeda
William M. M. Levack
Hisashi Noma
Noyuri Yamaji
Erika Ota
Takeshi Hasegawa
author_facet Naonori Tashiro
Hiroki Nishiwaki
Takashi Ikeda
William M. M. Levack
Hisashi Noma
Noyuri Yamaji
Erika Ota
Takeshi Hasegawa
author_sort Naonori Tashiro
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Prolonged mechanical ventilation is associated with an increased incidence of complications and higher mortality rates. Therefore, it is crucial to wean patients from mechanical ventilation as soon as possible. Recently, diaphragmatic ultrasound has been used in this decision-making process. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of diaphragmatic ultrasound to improve ventilator liberation outcomes. Methods We searched three databases – MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included randomized control trials that compared the use of diaphragmatic ultrasound to standard care in adult patients on mechanical ventilation via tracheal intubation. We assessed risk of bias for included trials with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool. For dichotomous outcomes, we reported risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For continuous outcomes, we reported mean differences (MD) with 95% CIs if all retrieved records provide data on the same scale. The primary outcome was incidence of reintubation within 48 h of extubation and the secondary outcomes included duration of mechanical ventilation, incidence of reintubation rate after 48 h, ICU length of stay, and adverse events. Results We found five relevant randomized controlled trials involving a total of 508 participants on mechanical ventilation in ICU following respiratory failure or surgery. Three studies (268 participants) provided data on the incidence of reintubation within 48 h of extubation. Using diaphragmatic ultrasound to guide extubation decisions led to a significant reduction in the risk of reintubation within 48 h (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.95, low certainty of evidence). No significant differences were found in the duration of mechanical ventilation (MD − 1.39 h, 95% CI − 17.5 to 14.71 h, three studies, 268 participants, very low certainty of evidence) or reintubation after 48 h (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.11–1.29, two studies, 240 participants, moderate certainty of evidence). However, ICU length of stay was significantly reduced in the diaphragmatic ultrasound group (MD − 1.0 days, 95% CI − 1.74 to − 0.26 days, one study, 130 participants, low certainty of evidence). Conclusion Using diaphragmatic ultrasound in addition to standard clinical criteria to guide decisions around ventilator use and liberation resulted in a reduced risk of reintubation within 48 h of extubation when compared to standard clinical criteria alone. Systematic review registration This systematic review was registered with the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/cn8xf .
format Article
id doaj-art-c2482f51438c4d618d5b3c4bd948c7bd
institution Kabale University
issn 2052-0492
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Intensive Care
spelling doaj-art-c2482f51438c4d618d5b3c4bd948c7bd2025-08-20T03:42:20ZengBMCJournal of Intensive Care2052-04922025-07-0113111010.1186/s40560-025-00811-0Clinical utility of diaphragmatic ultrasound for mechanical ventilator liberation in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysisNaonori Tashiro0Hiroki Nishiwaki1Takashi Ikeda2William M. M. Levack3Hisashi Noma4Noyuri Yamaji5Erika Ota6Takeshi Hasegawa7Division of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation, Showa Medical University Graduate School of Health SciencesInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology (iCE), Showa Medical UniversityInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology (iCE), Showa Medical UniversityDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, WellingtonDepartment of Data Science, The Institute of Statistical MathematicsInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology (iCE), Showa Medical UniversityGlobal Health Nursing, St. Luke’s International University Graduate School of NursingInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology (iCE), Showa Medical UniversityAbstract Background Prolonged mechanical ventilation is associated with an increased incidence of complications and higher mortality rates. Therefore, it is crucial to wean patients from mechanical ventilation as soon as possible. Recently, diaphragmatic ultrasound has been used in this decision-making process. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of diaphragmatic ultrasound to improve ventilator liberation outcomes. Methods We searched three databases – MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included randomized control trials that compared the use of diaphragmatic ultrasound to standard care in adult patients on mechanical ventilation via tracheal intubation. We assessed risk of bias for included trials with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool. For dichotomous outcomes, we reported risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For continuous outcomes, we reported mean differences (MD) with 95% CIs if all retrieved records provide data on the same scale. The primary outcome was incidence of reintubation within 48 h of extubation and the secondary outcomes included duration of mechanical ventilation, incidence of reintubation rate after 48 h, ICU length of stay, and adverse events. Results We found five relevant randomized controlled trials involving a total of 508 participants on mechanical ventilation in ICU following respiratory failure or surgery. Three studies (268 participants) provided data on the incidence of reintubation within 48 h of extubation. Using diaphragmatic ultrasound to guide extubation decisions led to a significant reduction in the risk of reintubation within 48 h (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.95, low certainty of evidence). No significant differences were found in the duration of mechanical ventilation (MD − 1.39 h, 95% CI − 17.5 to 14.71 h, three studies, 268 participants, very low certainty of evidence) or reintubation after 48 h (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.11–1.29, two studies, 240 participants, moderate certainty of evidence). However, ICU length of stay was significantly reduced in the diaphragmatic ultrasound group (MD − 1.0 days, 95% CI − 1.74 to − 0.26 days, one study, 130 participants, low certainty of evidence). Conclusion Using diaphragmatic ultrasound in addition to standard clinical criteria to guide decisions around ventilator use and liberation resulted in a reduced risk of reintubation within 48 h of extubation when compared to standard clinical criteria alone. Systematic review registration This systematic review was registered with the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/cn8xf .https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-025-00811-0Ventilator liberationUltrasoundDiaphragmatic dysfunctionMechanical ventilationCritical care
spellingShingle Naonori Tashiro
Hiroki Nishiwaki
Takashi Ikeda
William M. M. Levack
Hisashi Noma
Noyuri Yamaji
Erika Ota
Takeshi Hasegawa
Clinical utility of diaphragmatic ultrasound for mechanical ventilator liberation in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Journal of Intensive Care
Ventilator liberation
Ultrasound
Diaphragmatic dysfunction
Mechanical ventilation
Critical care
title Clinical utility of diaphragmatic ultrasound for mechanical ventilator liberation in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Clinical utility of diaphragmatic ultrasound for mechanical ventilator liberation in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Clinical utility of diaphragmatic ultrasound for mechanical ventilator liberation in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical utility of diaphragmatic ultrasound for mechanical ventilator liberation in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Clinical utility of diaphragmatic ultrasound for mechanical ventilator liberation in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort clinical utility of diaphragmatic ultrasound for mechanical ventilator liberation in adults a systematic review and meta analysis
topic Ventilator liberation
Ultrasound
Diaphragmatic dysfunction
Mechanical ventilation
Critical care
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-025-00811-0
work_keys_str_mv AT naonoritashiro clinicalutilityofdiaphragmaticultrasoundformechanicalventilatorliberationinadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hirokinishiwaki clinicalutilityofdiaphragmaticultrasoundformechanicalventilatorliberationinadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT takashiikeda clinicalutilityofdiaphragmaticultrasoundformechanicalventilatorliberationinadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT williammmlevack clinicalutilityofdiaphragmaticultrasoundformechanicalventilatorliberationinadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hisashinoma clinicalutilityofdiaphragmaticultrasoundformechanicalventilatorliberationinadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT noyuriyamaji clinicalutilityofdiaphragmaticultrasoundformechanicalventilatorliberationinadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT erikaota clinicalutilityofdiaphragmaticultrasoundformechanicalventilatorliberationinadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT takeshihasegawa clinicalutilityofdiaphragmaticultrasoundformechanicalventilatorliberationinadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis