Fixed and moving target drilling methods: effects on smash results in badminton players aged 14-16 years

Introduction: Achieving victory in badminton requires adequate skills and physicality. Smash is an important point in badminton to achieve victory. Optimizing smash performance in badminton requires the right training method. One method that is often used is fixed and moving targets. This method is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhammad Sukron Fauzi, dewangga yudhistira, Didik Cahyono, Gyta Krisdiana, Naheria Naheria, Hamdiana Hamdiana, Julianur Julianur, Muchamad Samsul Huda, Muhamad Saiin, Jeane Betty Kurnia Jusuf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: FEADEF 2025-06-01
Series:Retos: Nuevas Tendencias en Educación Física, Deportes y Recreación
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.revistaretos.org/index.php/retos/article/view/115437
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction: Achieving victory in badminton requires adequate skills and physicality. Smash is an important point in badminton to achieve victory. Optimizing smash performance in badminton requires the right training method. One method that is often used is fixed and moving targets. This method is believed to be able to improve badminton smash results. However, studies that examine this training method for ages 14-16 have not received special attention. Objective: The purpose of this study was to test the effect of fixed and moving target training methods on the smash results of badminton players aged 14-16 years. Methods: The research method is an experiment with a pretest-posttest design. 20 male participants were selected by purposive sampling and ordinal pairing. The instrument is a validated smash test. Data collection techniques with observation and testing. Data analysis techniques with paired and independent samples t-test with SPSS version 23. Results: The significance value of the pretest-posttest of each group (0.000 <0.05) that the posttest value is better. The significance value of the posttest of fixed targets and moving targets (0.01 <0.05) shows that fixed targets are better than moving targets. Conclusion: In short, fixed and moving target training are equally good for improving smash results, but the fixed target method is better than the moving target. The implication is that both methods can be recommended training to improve smash results. However, further research is needed in the characteristics of age, level of training, and research samples, so that more comprehensive results will be obtained.
ISSN:1579-1726
1988-2041