Health systems changes after decentralisation: progress, challenges and dynamics in Pakistan
Decentralisation is widely practised but its scrutiny tends to focus on structural and authority changes or outcomes. Politics and process of devolution implementation needs to be better understood to evaluate how national governments use the enhanced decision space for bringing improvements in the...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019-02-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Global Health |
| Online Access: | https://gh.bmj.com/content/4/1/e001013.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850060847223668736 |
|---|---|
| author | Shehla Abbas Zaidi Maryam Bigdeli Etienne V Langlois Atif Riaz David W Orr Nasir Idrees Jesse B Bump |
| author_facet | Shehla Abbas Zaidi Maryam Bigdeli Etienne V Langlois Atif Riaz David W Orr Nasir Idrees Jesse B Bump |
| author_sort | Shehla Abbas Zaidi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Decentralisation is widely practised but its scrutiny tends to focus on structural and authority changes or outcomes. Politics and process of devolution implementation needs to be better understood to evaluate how national governments use the enhanced decision space for bringing improvements in the health system and the underlying challenges faced. We use the example of Pakistan’s radical, politically driven provincial devolution to analyse how national structures use decentralisation opportunities for improved health planning, spending and carrying out transformations to the health system. Our narrative draws on secondary data sources from the PRIMASYS study, supplemented with policy roundtable notes from Pakistan.Our analysis shows that in decentralised Pakistan, health became prioritised for increased government resources and achieved good budgetary use, major strides were made contextualised sector-wide health planning and legislations, and a proliferation seen in governance measures to improve and regulate healthcare delivery. Despite a disadvantaged and abrupt start to devolution, high ownership by politicians and bureaucracy in provincial governments led to resourcing, planning and innovations. However, effective translation remained impeded by weak institutional capacity, feeble federal–provincial coordination and vulnerability to interference by local elites.Building on this illustrative example, we propose (1) political management of decentralisation for effective national coordination, sustaining stable leadership and protecting from political interfere by local elites; (2) investment in stewardship capacity in the devolved structures as well as the central ministry to deliver on new roles. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c2177b8a5f2e4202a7a12f10ba25eb4b |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2059-7908 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2019-02-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Global Health |
| spelling | doaj-art-c2177b8a5f2e4202a7a12f10ba25eb4b2025-08-20T02:50:26ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Global Health2059-79082019-02-014110.1136/bmjgh-2018-001013Health systems changes after decentralisation: progress, challenges and dynamics in PakistanShehla Abbas Zaidi0Maryam Bigdeli1Etienne V Langlois2Atif Riaz3David W Orr4Nasir Idrees5Jesse B Bump61 Department of Community Health Sciences & Women & Child Health Division, Aga Khan University, Karachi, PakistanHealth Systems Governance Collaborative, Geneva, SwitzerlandAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, SwitzerlandPediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan4 Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK5 Independent Governance Consultant, Islamabad, PakistanDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USADecentralisation is widely practised but its scrutiny tends to focus on structural and authority changes or outcomes. Politics and process of devolution implementation needs to be better understood to evaluate how national governments use the enhanced decision space for bringing improvements in the health system and the underlying challenges faced. We use the example of Pakistan’s radical, politically driven provincial devolution to analyse how national structures use decentralisation opportunities for improved health planning, spending and carrying out transformations to the health system. Our narrative draws on secondary data sources from the PRIMASYS study, supplemented with policy roundtable notes from Pakistan.Our analysis shows that in decentralised Pakistan, health became prioritised for increased government resources and achieved good budgetary use, major strides were made contextualised sector-wide health planning and legislations, and a proliferation seen in governance measures to improve and regulate healthcare delivery. Despite a disadvantaged and abrupt start to devolution, high ownership by politicians and bureaucracy in provincial governments led to resourcing, planning and innovations. However, effective translation remained impeded by weak institutional capacity, feeble federal–provincial coordination and vulnerability to interference by local elites.Building on this illustrative example, we propose (1) political management of decentralisation for effective national coordination, sustaining stable leadership and protecting from political interfere by local elites; (2) investment in stewardship capacity in the devolved structures as well as the central ministry to deliver on new roles.https://gh.bmj.com/content/4/1/e001013.full |
| spellingShingle | Shehla Abbas Zaidi Maryam Bigdeli Etienne V Langlois Atif Riaz David W Orr Nasir Idrees Jesse B Bump Health systems changes after decentralisation: progress, challenges and dynamics in Pakistan BMJ Global Health |
| title | Health systems changes after decentralisation: progress, challenges and dynamics in Pakistan |
| title_full | Health systems changes after decentralisation: progress, challenges and dynamics in Pakistan |
| title_fullStr | Health systems changes after decentralisation: progress, challenges and dynamics in Pakistan |
| title_full_unstemmed | Health systems changes after decentralisation: progress, challenges and dynamics in Pakistan |
| title_short | Health systems changes after decentralisation: progress, challenges and dynamics in Pakistan |
| title_sort | health systems changes after decentralisation progress challenges and dynamics in pakistan |
| url | https://gh.bmj.com/content/4/1/e001013.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT shehlaabbaszaidi healthsystemschangesafterdecentralisationprogresschallengesanddynamicsinpakistan AT maryambigdeli healthsystemschangesafterdecentralisationprogresschallengesanddynamicsinpakistan AT etiennevlanglois healthsystemschangesafterdecentralisationprogresschallengesanddynamicsinpakistan AT atifriaz healthsystemschangesafterdecentralisationprogresschallengesanddynamicsinpakistan AT davidworr healthsystemschangesafterdecentralisationprogresschallengesanddynamicsinpakistan AT nasiridrees healthsystemschangesafterdecentralisationprogresschallengesanddynamicsinpakistan AT jessebbump healthsystemschangesafterdecentralisationprogresschallengesanddynamicsinpakistan |