Perceptions of ethical decision-making climate among clinicians working in European and US ICUs: differences between religious and non-religious healthcare professionals

Abstract Background Making appropriate end-of-life decisions in the intensive care unit (ICU) requires shared interprofessional decision-making. Thus, a decision-making climate that values the contributions of all team members, addresses diverse opinions and seeks consensus among team members is nec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hanne Irene Jensen, Hans-Henrik Bülow, Lucas Dierickx, Stijn Vansteelandt, Rosanna Vaschetto, Gábor Élö, Ruth Piers, Dominique D. Benoit
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-02-01
Series:BMC Medical Ethics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01178-5
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861675147657216
author Hanne Irene Jensen
Hans-Henrik Bülow
Lucas Dierickx
Stijn Vansteelandt
Rosanna Vaschetto
Gábor Élö
Ruth Piers
Dominique D. Benoit
author_facet Hanne Irene Jensen
Hans-Henrik Bülow
Lucas Dierickx
Stijn Vansteelandt
Rosanna Vaschetto
Gábor Élö
Ruth Piers
Dominique D. Benoit
author_sort Hanne Irene Jensen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Making appropriate end-of-life decisions in the intensive care unit (ICU) requires shared interprofessional decision-making. Thus, a decision-making climate that values the contributions of all team members, addresses diverse opinions and seeks consensus among team members is necessary. Little is known about religion’s influence on ethical decision-making climates. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the association between religious belief and ethical decision-making climates. Methods The study was a cross-sectional analytical observation study as a part of the prospective observational DISPROPRICUS study. A total of 2,275 nurses and 717 physicians from 68 ICUs representing 12 countries in Europe and the US participated. All participants were asked which religion (if any) they belonged to and how important their religion (if any) was for their professional attitude towards end-of-life care. Perceptions of ethical decision-making climates were evaluated using a validated, 35-item self-assessment questionnaire that evaluates seven factors. Using cluster analysis, ICUs were categorised into four ethical decision-making climates: good, average (with nurses’ involvement at the end of life), average (without nurses’ involvement at the end of life) and poor. Results Of the 2,992 participants, 453 (15%) were religious (had religious convictions and found them important or very important for their attitude towards end-of-life care). The remaining 2,539 were non-religious (i.e. had religious convictions but assessed that they were not important for their attitude towards end-of-life care). When adjusting for country and ICU, the overall perception of the four ethical climates was associated with religious beliefs, with non-religious healthcare providers having more positive perceptions of the ethical climates compared to religious healthcare providers (p < 0.01). Within good climates, non-religious healthcare providers rated leadership by physicians (p < 0.01), interdisciplinary reflection (p  = 0.049) and active decision-making by physicians (p  = 0.02) as more positive compared to religious participants. In poor climates, religious healthcare providers had a more positive perception of the active involvement of nurses (p = 0.01). Within the other climates, no differences were found. Conclusions Overall perceptions of ethical decision-making climates were associated with religious beliefs, with non-religious healthcare providers generally having a more positive perception of the ethical climates than religious healthcare providers.
format Article
id doaj-art-c1eed61b87a44a3180eb64e088cac439
institution Kabale University
issn 1472-6939
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Ethics
spelling doaj-art-c1eed61b87a44a3180eb64e088cac4392025-02-09T12:53:23ZengBMCBMC Medical Ethics1472-69392025-02-012611810.1186/s12910-025-01178-5Perceptions of ethical decision-making climate among clinicians working in European and US ICUs: differences between religious and non-religious healthcare professionalsHanne Irene Jensen0Hans-Henrik Bülow1Lucas Dierickx2Stijn Vansteelandt3Rosanna Vaschetto4Gábor Élö5Ruth Piers6Dominique D. Benoit7Departments of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern DenmarkDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Holbaek HospitalDepartment of Marketing, Innovation and Organisation, Ghent UniversityDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent UniversityUniversity of Eastern PiedmontSemmelweis UniversityDepartment of Geriatrics, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent UniversityDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent UniversityAbstract Background Making appropriate end-of-life decisions in the intensive care unit (ICU) requires shared interprofessional decision-making. Thus, a decision-making climate that values the contributions of all team members, addresses diverse opinions and seeks consensus among team members is necessary. Little is known about religion’s influence on ethical decision-making climates. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the association between religious belief and ethical decision-making climates. Methods The study was a cross-sectional analytical observation study as a part of the prospective observational DISPROPRICUS study. A total of 2,275 nurses and 717 physicians from 68 ICUs representing 12 countries in Europe and the US participated. All participants were asked which religion (if any) they belonged to and how important their religion (if any) was for their professional attitude towards end-of-life care. Perceptions of ethical decision-making climates were evaluated using a validated, 35-item self-assessment questionnaire that evaluates seven factors. Using cluster analysis, ICUs were categorised into four ethical decision-making climates: good, average (with nurses’ involvement at the end of life), average (without nurses’ involvement at the end of life) and poor. Results Of the 2,992 participants, 453 (15%) were religious (had religious convictions and found them important or very important for their attitude towards end-of-life care). The remaining 2,539 were non-religious (i.e. had religious convictions but assessed that they were not important for their attitude towards end-of-life care). When adjusting for country and ICU, the overall perception of the four ethical climates was associated with religious beliefs, with non-religious healthcare providers having more positive perceptions of the ethical climates compared to religious healthcare providers (p < 0.01). Within good climates, non-religious healthcare providers rated leadership by physicians (p < 0.01), interdisciplinary reflection (p  = 0.049) and active decision-making by physicians (p  = 0.02) as more positive compared to religious participants. In poor climates, religious healthcare providers had a more positive perception of the active involvement of nurses (p = 0.01). Within the other climates, no differences were found. Conclusions Overall perceptions of ethical decision-making climates were associated with religious beliefs, with non-religious healthcare providers generally having a more positive perception of the ethical climates than religious healthcare providers.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01178-5ConflictsDecision-makingEnd-of-lifeEthical climateIntensive care unitInter-professional collaboration
spellingShingle Hanne Irene Jensen
Hans-Henrik Bülow
Lucas Dierickx
Stijn Vansteelandt
Rosanna Vaschetto
Gábor Élö
Ruth Piers
Dominique D. Benoit
Perceptions of ethical decision-making climate among clinicians working in European and US ICUs: differences between religious and non-religious healthcare professionals
BMC Medical Ethics
Conflicts
Decision-making
End-of-life
Ethical climate
Intensive care unit
Inter-professional collaboration
title Perceptions of ethical decision-making climate among clinicians working in European and US ICUs: differences between religious and non-religious healthcare professionals
title_full Perceptions of ethical decision-making climate among clinicians working in European and US ICUs: differences between religious and non-religious healthcare professionals
title_fullStr Perceptions of ethical decision-making climate among clinicians working in European and US ICUs: differences between religious and non-religious healthcare professionals
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions of ethical decision-making climate among clinicians working in European and US ICUs: differences between religious and non-religious healthcare professionals
title_short Perceptions of ethical decision-making climate among clinicians working in European and US ICUs: differences between religious and non-religious healthcare professionals
title_sort perceptions of ethical decision making climate among clinicians working in european and us icus differences between religious and non religious healthcare professionals
topic Conflicts
Decision-making
End-of-life
Ethical climate
Intensive care unit
Inter-professional collaboration
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01178-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hanneirenejensen perceptionsofethicaldecisionmakingclimateamongcliniciansworkingineuropeanandusicusdifferencesbetweenreligiousandnonreligioushealthcareprofessionals
AT hanshenrikbulow perceptionsofethicaldecisionmakingclimateamongcliniciansworkingineuropeanandusicusdifferencesbetweenreligiousandnonreligioushealthcareprofessionals
AT lucasdierickx perceptionsofethicaldecisionmakingclimateamongcliniciansworkingineuropeanandusicusdifferencesbetweenreligiousandnonreligioushealthcareprofessionals
AT stijnvansteelandt perceptionsofethicaldecisionmakingclimateamongcliniciansworkingineuropeanandusicusdifferencesbetweenreligiousandnonreligioushealthcareprofessionals
AT rosannavaschetto perceptionsofethicaldecisionmakingclimateamongcliniciansworkingineuropeanandusicusdifferencesbetweenreligiousandnonreligioushealthcareprofessionals
AT gaborelo perceptionsofethicaldecisionmakingclimateamongcliniciansworkingineuropeanandusicusdifferencesbetweenreligiousandnonreligioushealthcareprofessionals
AT ruthpiers perceptionsofethicaldecisionmakingclimateamongcliniciansworkingineuropeanandusicusdifferencesbetweenreligiousandnonreligioushealthcareprofessionals
AT dominiquedbenoit perceptionsofethicaldecisionmakingclimateamongcliniciansworkingineuropeanandusicusdifferencesbetweenreligiousandnonreligioushealthcareprofessionals