To each their own: sociodemographic disparities in student mental health

Research has demonstrated high rates of mental health problems in university students, and even higher rates in students belonging to historically marginalised populations. However, research on disparities in student mental health has almost exclusively focused on internalising problems (like sympto...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristel De Groot, Sander M. Wieman, Jan W. Van Strien, Oliver Lindemann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1391067/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850259026878660608
author Kristel De Groot
Kristel De Groot
Sander M. Wieman
Jan W. Van Strien
Oliver Lindemann
author_facet Kristel De Groot
Kristel De Groot
Sander M. Wieman
Jan W. Van Strien
Oliver Lindemann
author_sort Kristel De Groot
collection DOAJ
description Research has demonstrated high rates of mental health problems in university students, and even higher rates in students belonging to historically marginalised populations. However, research on disparities in student mental health has almost exclusively focused on internalising problems (like symptoms of depression and anxiety), overlooking other ways in which individuals experience and express negative emotion. To address this limitation, the present study employed the Brief Problem Monitor to examine three types of mental health problems—internalising, externalising, and attentional problems—across six sociodemographic characteristics: gender (male vs. female), sexual orientation (heterosexual vs. non-heterosexual), ethnicity (Dutch without vs. with migration background), internationality (domestic vs. international), disability (no disabilities vs. disabilities), and parental education (continuing- vs. first-generation). These sociodemographic variables were included in regression models simultaneously, thereby controlling for the effects of the others. Across a sample of 2,256 students, internalising problems were significantly higher in students who were female, non-heterosexual, international, and in those with disabilities. Higher externalising problems were found in female students, students with disabilities, those with a migration background, and first-generation students. Finally, attentional problems were higher in non-heterosexual students and students with disabilities. These findings support the premise that different groups of students experience different types of mental health concerns, emphasising the importance of measuring mental health multidimensionally. As an example, had the present study only examined internalising problems, we would not have found mental health disparities for students with a migration background and first-generation students, which has clear implications for outreach and resources offered to them.
format Article
id doaj-art-c18acb413f574c0faba2ea419baabe28
institution OA Journals
issn 2504-284X
language English
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Education
spelling doaj-art-c18acb413f574c0faba2ea419baabe282025-08-20T01:55:58ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Education2504-284X2024-09-01910.3389/feduc.2024.13910671391067To each their own: sociodemographic disparities in student mental healthKristel De Groot0Kristel De Groot1Sander M. Wieman2Jan W. Van Strien3Oliver Lindemann4Department of Psychology, Education & Child Studies, Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences (ESSB), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Applied Economics, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Economics and Business, Erasmus University College (EUC), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Psychology, Education & Child Studies, Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences (ESSB), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Psychology, Education & Child Studies, Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences (ESSB), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, NetherlandsResearch has demonstrated high rates of mental health problems in university students, and even higher rates in students belonging to historically marginalised populations. However, research on disparities in student mental health has almost exclusively focused on internalising problems (like symptoms of depression and anxiety), overlooking other ways in which individuals experience and express negative emotion. To address this limitation, the present study employed the Brief Problem Monitor to examine three types of mental health problems—internalising, externalising, and attentional problems—across six sociodemographic characteristics: gender (male vs. female), sexual orientation (heterosexual vs. non-heterosexual), ethnicity (Dutch without vs. with migration background), internationality (domestic vs. international), disability (no disabilities vs. disabilities), and parental education (continuing- vs. first-generation). These sociodemographic variables were included in regression models simultaneously, thereby controlling for the effects of the others. Across a sample of 2,256 students, internalising problems were significantly higher in students who were female, non-heterosexual, international, and in those with disabilities. Higher externalising problems were found in female students, students with disabilities, those with a migration background, and first-generation students. Finally, attentional problems were higher in non-heterosexual students and students with disabilities. These findings support the premise that different groups of students experience different types of mental health concerns, emphasising the importance of measuring mental health multidimensionally. As an example, had the present study only examined internalising problems, we would not have found mental health disparities for students with a migration background and first-generation students, which has clear implications for outreach and resources offered to them.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1391067/fulluniversity studentsmental healthminority groupsdiversityhigher education
spellingShingle Kristel De Groot
Kristel De Groot
Sander M. Wieman
Jan W. Van Strien
Oliver Lindemann
To each their own: sociodemographic disparities in student mental health
Frontiers in Education
university students
mental health
minority groups
diversity
higher education
title To each their own: sociodemographic disparities in student mental health
title_full To each their own: sociodemographic disparities in student mental health
title_fullStr To each their own: sociodemographic disparities in student mental health
title_full_unstemmed To each their own: sociodemographic disparities in student mental health
title_short To each their own: sociodemographic disparities in student mental health
title_sort to each their own sociodemographic disparities in student mental health
topic university students
mental health
minority groups
diversity
higher education
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1391067/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kristeldegroot toeachtheirownsociodemographicdisparitiesinstudentmentalhealth
AT kristeldegroot toeachtheirownsociodemographicdisparitiesinstudentmentalhealth
AT sandermwieman toeachtheirownsociodemographicdisparitiesinstudentmentalhealth
AT janwvanstrien toeachtheirownsociodemographicdisparitiesinstudentmentalhealth
AT oliverlindemann toeachtheirownsociodemographicdisparitiesinstudentmentalhealth