A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Complications after Thyroidectomy under Different Anesthetic Techniques: Volatile Anesthesia versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia

While the postoperative outcome is favorable, post-thyroidectomy pain is considerable. Reducing the postoperative acute pain, therefore, is considered important. This study investigated whether the pain intensity and need for rescue analgesics during the immediate postoperative period after thyroide...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jun-Young Jo, Yeon Ju Kim, Seong-Soo Choi, Jihoon Park, Han Park, Kyung-Don Hahm
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Pain Research and Management
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8876906
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832550516555513856
author Jun-Young Jo
Yeon Ju Kim
Seong-Soo Choi
Jihoon Park
Han Park
Kyung-Don Hahm
author_facet Jun-Young Jo
Yeon Ju Kim
Seong-Soo Choi
Jihoon Park
Han Park
Kyung-Don Hahm
author_sort Jun-Young Jo
collection DOAJ
description While the postoperative outcome is favorable, post-thyroidectomy pain is considerable. Reducing the postoperative acute pain, therefore, is considered important. This study investigated whether the pain intensity and need for rescue analgesics during the immediate postoperative period after thyroidectomy differ according to the methods of anesthesia. Seventy-two patients undergoing total thyroidectomy under general anesthesia were examined. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol (TIVA, n = 35) or propofol induction and maintenance with desflurane and nitrous oxide (volatile anesthesia [VA], n = 37). The mean administered dose of remifentanil was 1977.7 ± 722.5 μg in the TIVA group, which was approximately 0.268 ± 0.118 μg/min/kg during surgery. Pain scores based on a numeric rating scale (NRS) and the need for rescue analgesics were compared between groups at the postoperative anesthetic care unit (PACU). The immediate postoperative NRS values of the TIVA and VA groups were 5.7 ± 1.7 and 4.7 ± 2.3, respectively (P = 0.034). Postoperative morphine equianalgesic doses in the PACU were higher in the TIVA group than in the VA group (16.7 ± 3.8 mg vs. 14.1 ± 5.9 mg, P = 0.027). The incidence of immediate postanesthetic complications did not differ significantly between groups. In conclusion, more rescue analgesics were required in the TIVA group than in the VA group to adequately manage postoperative pain while staying in the PACU after thyroidectomy.
format Article
id doaj-art-c184c7f746954e16bb92665fc6abf720
institution Kabale University
issn 1203-6765
1918-1523
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Pain Research and Management
spelling doaj-art-c184c7f746954e16bb92665fc6abf7202025-02-03T06:06:39ZengWileyPain Research and Management1203-67651918-15232021-01-01202110.1155/2021/88769068876906A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Complications after Thyroidectomy under Different Anesthetic Techniques: Volatile Anesthesia versus Total Intravenous AnesthesiaJun-Young Jo0Yeon Ju Kim1Seong-Soo Choi2Jihoon Park3Han Park4Kyung-Don Hahm5Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Laboratory for Perioperative Outcome Research, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Laboratory for Perioperative Outcome Research, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Laboratory for Perioperative Outcome Research, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Laboratory for Perioperative Outcome Research, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Laboratory for Perioperative Outcome Research, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Laboratory for Perioperative Outcome Research, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of KoreaWhile the postoperative outcome is favorable, post-thyroidectomy pain is considerable. Reducing the postoperative acute pain, therefore, is considered important. This study investigated whether the pain intensity and need for rescue analgesics during the immediate postoperative period after thyroidectomy differ according to the methods of anesthesia. Seventy-two patients undergoing total thyroidectomy under general anesthesia were examined. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol (TIVA, n = 35) or propofol induction and maintenance with desflurane and nitrous oxide (volatile anesthesia [VA], n = 37). The mean administered dose of remifentanil was 1977.7 ± 722.5 μg in the TIVA group, which was approximately 0.268 ± 0.118 μg/min/kg during surgery. Pain scores based on a numeric rating scale (NRS) and the need for rescue analgesics were compared between groups at the postoperative anesthetic care unit (PACU). The immediate postoperative NRS values of the TIVA and VA groups were 5.7 ± 1.7 and 4.7 ± 2.3, respectively (P = 0.034). Postoperative morphine equianalgesic doses in the PACU were higher in the TIVA group than in the VA group (16.7 ± 3.8 mg vs. 14.1 ± 5.9 mg, P = 0.027). The incidence of immediate postanesthetic complications did not differ significantly between groups. In conclusion, more rescue analgesics were required in the TIVA group than in the VA group to adequately manage postoperative pain while staying in the PACU after thyroidectomy.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8876906
spellingShingle Jun-Young Jo
Yeon Ju Kim
Seong-Soo Choi
Jihoon Park
Han Park
Kyung-Don Hahm
A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Complications after Thyroidectomy under Different Anesthetic Techniques: Volatile Anesthesia versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia
Pain Research and Management
title A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Complications after Thyroidectomy under Different Anesthetic Techniques: Volatile Anesthesia versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia
title_full A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Complications after Thyroidectomy under Different Anesthetic Techniques: Volatile Anesthesia versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia
title_fullStr A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Complications after Thyroidectomy under Different Anesthetic Techniques: Volatile Anesthesia versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Complications after Thyroidectomy under Different Anesthetic Techniques: Volatile Anesthesia versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia
title_short A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Complications after Thyroidectomy under Different Anesthetic Techniques: Volatile Anesthesia versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia
title_sort prospective randomized comparison of postoperative pain and complications after thyroidectomy under different anesthetic techniques volatile anesthesia versus total intravenous anesthesia
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8876906
work_keys_str_mv AT junyoungjo aprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofpostoperativepainandcomplicationsafterthyroidectomyunderdifferentanesthetictechniquesvolatileanesthesiaversustotalintravenousanesthesia
AT yeonjukim aprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofpostoperativepainandcomplicationsafterthyroidectomyunderdifferentanesthetictechniquesvolatileanesthesiaversustotalintravenousanesthesia
AT seongsoochoi aprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofpostoperativepainandcomplicationsafterthyroidectomyunderdifferentanesthetictechniquesvolatileanesthesiaversustotalintravenousanesthesia
AT jihoonpark aprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofpostoperativepainandcomplicationsafterthyroidectomyunderdifferentanesthetictechniquesvolatileanesthesiaversustotalintravenousanesthesia
AT hanpark aprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofpostoperativepainandcomplicationsafterthyroidectomyunderdifferentanesthetictechniquesvolatileanesthesiaversustotalintravenousanesthesia
AT kyungdonhahm aprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofpostoperativepainandcomplicationsafterthyroidectomyunderdifferentanesthetictechniquesvolatileanesthesiaversustotalintravenousanesthesia
AT junyoungjo prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofpostoperativepainandcomplicationsafterthyroidectomyunderdifferentanesthetictechniquesvolatileanesthesiaversustotalintravenousanesthesia
AT yeonjukim prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofpostoperativepainandcomplicationsafterthyroidectomyunderdifferentanesthetictechniquesvolatileanesthesiaversustotalintravenousanesthesia
AT seongsoochoi prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofpostoperativepainandcomplicationsafterthyroidectomyunderdifferentanesthetictechniquesvolatileanesthesiaversustotalintravenousanesthesia
AT jihoonpark prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofpostoperativepainandcomplicationsafterthyroidectomyunderdifferentanesthetictechniquesvolatileanesthesiaversustotalintravenousanesthesia
AT hanpark prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofpostoperativepainandcomplicationsafterthyroidectomyunderdifferentanesthetictechniquesvolatileanesthesiaversustotalintravenousanesthesia
AT kyungdonhahm prospectiverandomizedcomparisonofpostoperativepainandcomplicationsafterthyroidectomyunderdifferentanesthetictechniquesvolatileanesthesiaversustotalintravenousanesthesia