Obstructive sleep apnea: A categorical cluster analysis and visualization
Introduction and Objectives Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent sleep condition which is very heterogeneous although not formally characterized as such, resulting in missed or delayed diagnosis. Cluster analysis has been used in different clinical domains, particularly within sleep disorder...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis
2023-05-01
|
| Series: | Pulmonology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.10.003 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Introduction and Objectives Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent sleep condition which is very heterogeneous although not formally characterized as such, resulting in missed or delayed diagnosis. Cluster analysis has been used in different clinical domains, particularly within sleep disorders. We aim to understand OSA heterogeneity and provide a variety of cluster visualizations to communicate the information clearly and efficiently.Materials and Methods We applied an extension of k-means to be used in categorical variables: k-modes, to identify OSA patients’ groups, based on demographic, physical examination, clinical history, and comorbidities characterization variables (n = 40) obtained from a derivation and validation cohorts (211 and 53, respectively) from the northern region of Portugal. Missing values were imputed with k-nearest neighbours (k-NN) and a chi-square test was held for feature selection.Results Thirteen variables were inserted in phenotypes, resulting in the following three clusters: Cluster 1, middle-aged males reporting witnessed apneas and high alcohol consumption before sleep; Cluster 2, middle-aged women with increased neck circumference (NC), non-repairing sleep and morning headaches; and Cluster 3, obese elderly males with increased NC, witnessed apneas and alcohol consumption. Patients from the validation cohort assigned to different clusters showed similar proportions when compared with the derivation cohort, for mild (C1: 56 vs 75%, P = 0.230; C2: 61 vs 75%, P = 0.128; C3: 45 vs 48%, P = 0.831), moderate (C1: 24 vs 25%; C2: 20 vs 25%; C3: 25 vs 19%) and severe (C1: 20 vs 0%; C2: 18 vs 0%; C3: 29 vs 33%) levels. Therefore, the allocation supported the validation of the obtained clusters.Conclusions Our findings suggest different OSA patients’ groups, creating the need to rethink these patients’ stereotypical baseline characteristics. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2531-0429 2531-0437 |