Strong genetic influence on a UK nationwide test of educational achievement at the end of compulsory education at age 16.

We have previously shown that individual differences in educational achievement are highly heritable in the early and middle school years in the UK. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether similarly high heritability is found at the end of compulsory education (age 16) for the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicholas G Shakeshaft, Maciej Trzaskowski, Andrew McMillan, Kaili Rimfeld, Eva Krapohl, Claire M A Haworth, Philip S Dale, Robert Plomin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080341
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850161616547479552
author Nicholas G Shakeshaft
Maciej Trzaskowski
Andrew McMillan
Kaili Rimfeld
Eva Krapohl
Claire M A Haworth
Philip S Dale
Robert Plomin
author_facet Nicholas G Shakeshaft
Maciej Trzaskowski
Andrew McMillan
Kaili Rimfeld
Eva Krapohl
Claire M A Haworth
Philip S Dale
Robert Plomin
author_sort Nicholas G Shakeshaft
collection DOAJ
description We have previously shown that individual differences in educational achievement are highly heritable in the early and middle school years in the UK. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether similarly high heritability is found at the end of compulsory education (age 16) for the UK-wide examination, called the General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE). In a national twin sample of 11,117 16-year-olds, heritability was substantial for overall GCSE performance for compulsory core subjects (58%) as well as for each of them individually: English (52%), mathematics (55%) and science (58%). In contrast, the overall effects of shared environment, which includes all family and school influences shared by members of twin pairs growing up in the same family and attending the same school, accounts for about 36% of the variance of mean GCSE scores. The significance of these findings is that individual differences in educational achievement at the end of compulsory education are not primarily an index of the quality of teachers or schools: much more of the variance of GCSE scores can be attributed to genetics than to school or family environment. We suggest a model of education that recognizes the important role of genetics. Rather than a passive model of schooling as instruction (instruere, 'to build in'), we propose an active model of education (educare, 'to bring out') in which children create their own educational experiences in part on the basis of their genetic propensities, which supports the trend towards personalized learning.
format Article
id doaj-art-c17276af104445339a8cfec84eab0610
institution OA Journals
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-c17276af104445339a8cfec84eab06102025-08-20T02:22:46ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01812e8034110.1371/journal.pone.0080341Strong genetic influence on a UK nationwide test of educational achievement at the end of compulsory education at age 16.Nicholas G ShakeshaftMaciej TrzaskowskiAndrew McMillanKaili RimfeldEva KrapohlClaire M A HaworthPhilip S DaleRobert PlominWe have previously shown that individual differences in educational achievement are highly heritable in the early and middle school years in the UK. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether similarly high heritability is found at the end of compulsory education (age 16) for the UK-wide examination, called the General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE). In a national twin sample of 11,117 16-year-olds, heritability was substantial for overall GCSE performance for compulsory core subjects (58%) as well as for each of them individually: English (52%), mathematics (55%) and science (58%). In contrast, the overall effects of shared environment, which includes all family and school influences shared by members of twin pairs growing up in the same family and attending the same school, accounts for about 36% of the variance of mean GCSE scores. The significance of these findings is that individual differences in educational achievement at the end of compulsory education are not primarily an index of the quality of teachers or schools: much more of the variance of GCSE scores can be attributed to genetics than to school or family environment. We suggest a model of education that recognizes the important role of genetics. Rather than a passive model of schooling as instruction (instruere, 'to build in'), we propose an active model of education (educare, 'to bring out') in which children create their own educational experiences in part on the basis of their genetic propensities, which supports the trend towards personalized learning.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080341
spellingShingle Nicholas G Shakeshaft
Maciej Trzaskowski
Andrew McMillan
Kaili Rimfeld
Eva Krapohl
Claire M A Haworth
Philip S Dale
Robert Plomin
Strong genetic influence on a UK nationwide test of educational achievement at the end of compulsory education at age 16.
PLoS ONE
title Strong genetic influence on a UK nationwide test of educational achievement at the end of compulsory education at age 16.
title_full Strong genetic influence on a UK nationwide test of educational achievement at the end of compulsory education at age 16.
title_fullStr Strong genetic influence on a UK nationwide test of educational achievement at the end of compulsory education at age 16.
title_full_unstemmed Strong genetic influence on a UK nationwide test of educational achievement at the end of compulsory education at age 16.
title_short Strong genetic influence on a UK nationwide test of educational achievement at the end of compulsory education at age 16.
title_sort strong genetic influence on a uk nationwide test of educational achievement at the end of compulsory education at age 16
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080341
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholasgshakeshaft stronggeneticinfluenceonauknationwidetestofeducationalachievementattheendofcompulsoryeducationatage16
AT maciejtrzaskowski stronggeneticinfluenceonauknationwidetestofeducationalachievementattheendofcompulsoryeducationatage16
AT andrewmcmillan stronggeneticinfluenceonauknationwidetestofeducationalachievementattheendofcompulsoryeducationatage16
AT kailirimfeld stronggeneticinfluenceonauknationwidetestofeducationalachievementattheendofcompulsoryeducationatage16
AT evakrapohl stronggeneticinfluenceonauknationwidetestofeducationalachievementattheendofcompulsoryeducationatage16
AT clairemahaworth stronggeneticinfluenceonauknationwidetestofeducationalachievementattheendofcompulsoryeducationatage16
AT philipsdale stronggeneticinfluenceonauknationwidetestofeducationalachievementattheendofcompulsoryeducationatage16
AT robertplomin stronggeneticinfluenceonauknationwidetestofeducationalachievementattheendofcompulsoryeducationatage16