Health, human rights and freedom at stake? A critical discourse analysis of the Swedish media debate on the national COVID-19 pandemic strategy

Purpose The aim of this study is to, in the Swedish media debate, explore the discursive constructions of challenges in human rights and freedoms following the national spatial strategy for health and survival during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods The study, inspired by a critical discourse analytic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Malin Hallén, Kristina Tryselius
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-12-01
Series:International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2024.2387842
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850061580522225664
author Malin Hallén
Kristina Tryselius
author_facet Malin Hallén
Kristina Tryselius
author_sort Malin Hallén
collection DOAJ
description Purpose The aim of this study is to, in the Swedish media debate, explore the discursive constructions of challenges in human rights and freedoms following the national spatial strategy for health and survival during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods The study, inspired by a critical discourse analytic approach, focused particularly on the issues addressed, subject positions, relations and rhetoric. Seventeen opinion articles published in Swedish national newspapers December 2019 - February 2022 were analysed. Results The main contents were threats to democracy, threats to the freedom and rights of specific groups, and threats to the debate itself. Contents were expressed through three discourse dichotomies: contribution vs interjection, documented vs alarmistic, and active on the stage vs commenting from the balcony. Conclusions Striking about the results is the absence of dialogue, the one-way communication, and the absent politicians. It seems that the analysed debate on the challenges of the Swedish COVID-19 pandemic strategy, based on its impact on overall freedoms and rights, has not been the focus of decision-makers during the pandemic. They have neither addressed the threats highlighted in the articles, nor contributed to the discourse. This is worrying for the long-term maintenance and development of a healthy democracy.
format Article
id doaj-art-c1383e804ff749678fb17b3a7b843d14
institution DOAJ
issn 1748-2623
1748-2631
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being
spelling doaj-art-c1383e804ff749678fb17b3a7b843d142025-08-20T02:50:12ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being1748-26231748-26312024-12-0119110.1080/17482631.2024.23878422387842Health, human rights and freedom at stake? A critical discourse analysis of the Swedish media debate on the national COVID-19 pandemic strategyMalin Hallén0Kristina Tryselius1Halmstad UniversityLinnaeus UniversityPurpose The aim of this study is to, in the Swedish media debate, explore the discursive constructions of challenges in human rights and freedoms following the national spatial strategy for health and survival during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods The study, inspired by a critical discourse analytic approach, focused particularly on the issues addressed, subject positions, relations and rhetoric. Seventeen opinion articles published in Swedish national newspapers December 2019 - February 2022 were analysed. Results The main contents were threats to democracy, threats to the freedom and rights of specific groups, and threats to the debate itself. Contents were expressed through three discourse dichotomies: contribution vs interjection, documented vs alarmistic, and active on the stage vs commenting from the balcony. Conclusions Striking about the results is the absence of dialogue, the one-way communication, and the absent politicians. It seems that the analysed debate on the challenges of the Swedish COVID-19 pandemic strategy, based on its impact on overall freedoms and rights, has not been the focus of decision-makers during the pandemic. They have neither addressed the threats highlighted in the articles, nor contributed to the discourse. This is worrying for the long-term maintenance and development of a healthy democracy.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2024.2387842covid-19national strategyswedenhealthhuman rightsmedia debatediscourse
spellingShingle Malin Hallén
Kristina Tryselius
Health, human rights and freedom at stake? A critical discourse analysis of the Swedish media debate on the national COVID-19 pandemic strategy
International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being
covid-19
national strategy
sweden
health
human rights
media debate
discourse
title Health, human rights and freedom at stake? A critical discourse analysis of the Swedish media debate on the national COVID-19 pandemic strategy
title_full Health, human rights and freedom at stake? A critical discourse analysis of the Swedish media debate on the national COVID-19 pandemic strategy
title_fullStr Health, human rights and freedom at stake? A critical discourse analysis of the Swedish media debate on the national COVID-19 pandemic strategy
title_full_unstemmed Health, human rights and freedom at stake? A critical discourse analysis of the Swedish media debate on the national COVID-19 pandemic strategy
title_short Health, human rights and freedom at stake? A critical discourse analysis of the Swedish media debate on the national COVID-19 pandemic strategy
title_sort health human rights and freedom at stake a critical discourse analysis of the swedish media debate on the national covid 19 pandemic strategy
topic covid-19
national strategy
sweden
health
human rights
media debate
discourse
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2024.2387842
work_keys_str_mv AT malinhallen healthhumanrightsandfreedomatstakeacriticaldiscourseanalysisoftheswedishmediadebateonthenationalcovid19pandemicstrategy
AT kristinatryselius healthhumanrightsandfreedomatstakeacriticaldiscourseanalysisoftheswedishmediadebateonthenationalcovid19pandemicstrategy