Manually scoring actigraphy in the absence of a sleep diary: Reliability analysis in Gulf War veterans

Introduction: The process of manually scoring actigraphy data can be subjective with few studies utilizing and reporting clear actigraphy scoring guidelines. Clinical populations often have challenges with accurately and consistently completing sleep diaries which support actigraphy scoring. Objecti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charity B. Breneman, Mary Katherine Howell, Nathaniel Allen, Elizabeth A. Klingaman, Matthew J. Reinhard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-12-01
Series:Sleep Epidemiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266734362400012X
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850060768685326336
author Charity B. Breneman
Mary Katherine Howell
Nathaniel Allen
Elizabeth A. Klingaman
Matthew J. Reinhard
author_facet Charity B. Breneman
Mary Katherine Howell
Nathaniel Allen
Elizabeth A. Klingaman
Matthew J. Reinhard
author_sort Charity B. Breneman
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The process of manually scoring actigraphy data can be subjective with few studies utilizing and reporting clear actigraphy scoring guidelines. Clinical populations often have challenges with accurately and consistently completing sleep diaries which support actigraphy scoring. Objective: To promote internal consistency and replicability in actigraphy scoring procedures, this study developed a detailed actigraphy scoring protocol for cases without sleep diary data and performed an inter-rater reliability analysis using a sample of veterans with Gulf War Illness (GWI). Methods: One hundred fifty-nine nights of actigraphy data from a random subsample of 25 veterans with GWI were independently, manually scored using the protocol. Mean values for the start and end of rest intervals and derived sleep parameters—time in bed (TIB), total sleep time (TST), and sleep efficiency (SE)—and mean differences were calculated. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated using intra-class correlation (ICC). Results: ICC demonstrated excellent agreement between manual scorers for rest interval start (ICC = 0.98) and end times (0.99), TIB (0.94), TST (0.98), and SE (0.97). There were no clinically important differences (greater than 15 min) between manual scorers for the start of rest (average difference: 6 mins ± 28) or the end of rest (2 mins ± 23). Conclusion: This protocol may serve as a reproducible set of guidelines for researchers manually scoring actigraphy and enhance internal consistency for studies, especially for those working with clinical populations with significant sleep disturbance and related difficulties yielding quality sleep diary data.
format Article
id doaj-art-c115cd07af9c4c4b8b2b96a76a8e9789
institution DOAJ
issn 2667-3436
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Sleep Epidemiology
spelling doaj-art-c115cd07af9c4c4b8b2b96a76a8e97892025-08-20T02:50:27ZengElsevierSleep Epidemiology2667-34362024-12-01410008410.1016/j.sleepe.2024.100084Manually scoring actigraphy in the absence of a sleep diary: Reliability analysis in Gulf War veteransCharity B. Breneman0Mary Katherine Howell1Nathaniel Allen2Elizabeth A. Klingaman3Matthew J. Reinhard4Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA; War Related Illness and Injury Study Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, 20422, USA; Corresponding author.Veterans Integrated Services Network 5 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, USA; Corresponding author.War Related Illness and Injury Study Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, 20422, USAVeterans Integrated Services Network 5 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, USA; University of Maryland School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USAWar Related Illness and Injury Study Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, 20422, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Georgetown University Medical Center, 2115 Wisconsin Ave NW, Washington, DC, 20057, USAIntroduction: The process of manually scoring actigraphy data can be subjective with few studies utilizing and reporting clear actigraphy scoring guidelines. Clinical populations often have challenges with accurately and consistently completing sleep diaries which support actigraphy scoring. Objective: To promote internal consistency and replicability in actigraphy scoring procedures, this study developed a detailed actigraphy scoring protocol for cases without sleep diary data and performed an inter-rater reliability analysis using a sample of veterans with Gulf War Illness (GWI). Methods: One hundred fifty-nine nights of actigraphy data from a random subsample of 25 veterans with GWI were independently, manually scored using the protocol. Mean values for the start and end of rest intervals and derived sleep parameters—time in bed (TIB), total sleep time (TST), and sleep efficiency (SE)—and mean differences were calculated. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated using intra-class correlation (ICC). Results: ICC demonstrated excellent agreement between manual scorers for rest interval start (ICC = 0.98) and end times (0.99), TIB (0.94), TST (0.98), and SE (0.97). There were no clinically important differences (greater than 15 min) between manual scorers for the start of rest (average difference: 6 mins ± 28) or the end of rest (2 mins ± 23). Conclusion: This protocol may serve as a reproducible set of guidelines for researchers manually scoring actigraphy and enhance internal consistency for studies, especially for those working with clinical populations with significant sleep disturbance and related difficulties yielding quality sleep diary data.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266734362400012XSleepActigraphyManual scoringReliabilityVeteransGulf War Illness
spellingShingle Charity B. Breneman
Mary Katherine Howell
Nathaniel Allen
Elizabeth A. Klingaman
Matthew J. Reinhard
Manually scoring actigraphy in the absence of a sleep diary: Reliability analysis in Gulf War veterans
Sleep Epidemiology
Sleep
Actigraphy
Manual scoring
Reliability
Veterans
Gulf War Illness
title Manually scoring actigraphy in the absence of a sleep diary: Reliability analysis in Gulf War veterans
title_full Manually scoring actigraphy in the absence of a sleep diary: Reliability analysis in Gulf War veterans
title_fullStr Manually scoring actigraphy in the absence of a sleep diary: Reliability analysis in Gulf War veterans
title_full_unstemmed Manually scoring actigraphy in the absence of a sleep diary: Reliability analysis in Gulf War veterans
title_short Manually scoring actigraphy in the absence of a sleep diary: Reliability analysis in Gulf War veterans
title_sort manually scoring actigraphy in the absence of a sleep diary reliability analysis in gulf war veterans
topic Sleep
Actigraphy
Manual scoring
Reliability
Veterans
Gulf War Illness
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266734362400012X
work_keys_str_mv AT charitybbreneman manuallyscoringactigraphyintheabsenceofasleepdiaryreliabilityanalysisingulfwarveterans
AT marykatherinehowell manuallyscoringactigraphyintheabsenceofasleepdiaryreliabilityanalysisingulfwarveterans
AT nathanielallen manuallyscoringactigraphyintheabsenceofasleepdiaryreliabilityanalysisingulfwarveterans
AT elizabethaklingaman manuallyscoringactigraphyintheabsenceofasleepdiaryreliabilityanalysisingulfwarveterans
AT matthewjreinhard manuallyscoringactigraphyintheabsenceofasleepdiaryreliabilityanalysisingulfwarveterans