Forensic Psychological Harm in Victims of Child Sexual Abuse: A Meta-analytic Review
Background/aim: In child sexual abuse (CSA) cases, the forensic evaluation of psychological harm is crucial for substantiating victim testimony and informing compensation awards. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is the primary diagnosis for assessing forensic harm, as it establishes the causal l...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Sociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y Forense
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://journals.copmadrid.org/ejpalc/art/ejpalc2025a10
|
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849411487901155328 |
|---|---|
| author | Blanca Cea Álvaro Montes Alexander Trinidad Ramón Arce |
| author_facet | Blanca Cea Álvaro Montes Alexander Trinidad Ramón Arce |
| author_sort | Blanca Cea |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background/aim: In child sexual abuse (CSA) cases, the forensic evaluation of psychological harm is crucial for substantiating victim testimony and informing compensation awards. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is the primary diagnosis for assessing forensic harm, as it establishes the causal link between the harm and the CSA event. Thus, a meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the effect of CSA victimization on PTSD development and the probability of resulting psychological harm, and to determine the incremental harm attributable to CSA victimization. Method: A total of 126 primary studies were selected, yielding 195 effect sizes and a cumulative sample of 29,517 victims. Random effects psychometric meta-analyses were performed, correcting effect sizes for sampling error and criterion unreliability to obtain the true effect size (δ). Results: An overall large true effect size (δ = 0.93) was found between CSA victimization and PTSD outcomes. Given the heterogeneity of the studies, moderating variables were examined, revealing that female victims (δ = 0.99), intrafamilial abuse (δ = 1.68) and penetrative acts (δ = 1.23) were associated with significantly higher psychological harm attributable to CSA victimization than males (δ = 0.68), extrafamilial abuse (δ = 1.24) and non-penetrative sexual touching (δ = 1.01), respectively. The prevalence of PTSD diagnosis in CSA survivors was estimated at 33.95%. The incremental harm due to CSA victimization was estimated at 42.2% in general, with specific higher rates for intrafamilial abuse (64.3%) and for victims of penetration (54.4%). Conclusions: These findings provide robust evidence of the psychological harm (PTSD) resulting from CSA victimization and identify specific abuse characteristics that exacerbate such a harm. The judicial implications for the burden of proof are discussed and gold standards for civil compensation to victims are suggested as follows: a general gold standard of 42.2% for victims of CSA, and higher gold standards for victims of intrafamilial abuse (64.3%) and victims of penetration (54.4%). |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c10d7780828d4b9fbf2f5dcd6815625b |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1889-1861 1989-4007 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | Sociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y Forense |
| record_format | Article |
| series | European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context |
| spelling | doaj-art-c10d7780828d4b9fbf2f5dcd6815625b2025-08-20T03:34:45ZengSociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y ForenseEuropean Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context1889-18611989-40072025-07-0117211112910.5093/ejpalc2025a1011320559Forensic Psychological Harm in Victims of Child Sexual Abuse: A Meta-analytic ReviewBlanca Cea0Álvaro Montes1Alexander Trinidad2Ramón Arce3Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela , Spain, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Spain;Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela , Spain, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Spain;University of Cologne, Cologne , Germany, University of Cologne, GermanyUniversidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela , Spain, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Spain;Background/aim: In child sexual abuse (CSA) cases, the forensic evaluation of psychological harm is crucial for substantiating victim testimony and informing compensation awards. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is the primary diagnosis for assessing forensic harm, as it establishes the causal link between the harm and the CSA event. Thus, a meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the effect of CSA victimization on PTSD development and the probability of resulting psychological harm, and to determine the incremental harm attributable to CSA victimization. Method: A total of 126 primary studies were selected, yielding 195 effect sizes and a cumulative sample of 29,517 victims. Random effects psychometric meta-analyses were performed, correcting effect sizes for sampling error and criterion unreliability to obtain the true effect size (δ). Results: An overall large true effect size (δ = 0.93) was found between CSA victimization and PTSD outcomes. Given the heterogeneity of the studies, moderating variables were examined, revealing that female victims (δ = 0.99), intrafamilial abuse (δ = 1.68) and penetrative acts (δ = 1.23) were associated with significantly higher psychological harm attributable to CSA victimization than males (δ = 0.68), extrafamilial abuse (δ = 1.24) and non-penetrative sexual touching (δ = 1.01), respectively. The prevalence of PTSD diagnosis in CSA survivors was estimated at 33.95%. The incremental harm due to CSA victimization was estimated at 42.2% in general, with specific higher rates for intrafamilial abuse (64.3%) and for victims of penetration (54.4%). Conclusions: These findings provide robust evidence of the psychological harm (PTSD) resulting from CSA victimization and identify specific abuse characteristics that exacerbate such a harm. The judicial implications for the burden of proof are discussed and gold standards for civil compensation to victims are suggested as follows: a general gold standard of 42.2% for victims of CSA, and higher gold standards for victims of intrafamilial abuse (64.3%) and victims of penetration (54.4%). https://journals.copmadrid.org/ejpalc/art/ejpalc2025a10 posttraumatic stress disorderforensic evaluationvictimizationburden of proofforensic expertisecompensation to victims |
| spellingShingle | Blanca Cea Álvaro Montes Alexander Trinidad Ramón Arce Forensic Psychological Harm in Victims of Child Sexual Abuse: A Meta-analytic Review European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context posttraumatic stress disorder forensic evaluation victimization burden of proof forensic expertise compensation to victims |
| title | Forensic Psychological Harm in Victims of Child Sexual Abuse: A Meta-analytic Review |
| title_full | Forensic Psychological Harm in Victims of Child Sexual Abuse: A Meta-analytic Review |
| title_fullStr | Forensic Psychological Harm in Victims of Child Sexual Abuse: A Meta-analytic Review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Forensic Psychological Harm in Victims of Child Sexual Abuse: A Meta-analytic Review |
| title_short | Forensic Psychological Harm in Victims of Child Sexual Abuse: A Meta-analytic Review |
| title_sort | forensic psychological harm in victims of child sexual abuse a meta analytic review |
| topic | posttraumatic stress disorder forensic evaluation victimization burden of proof forensic expertise compensation to victims |
| url |
https://journals.copmadrid.org/ejpalc/art/ejpalc2025a10
|
| work_keys_str_mv | AT blancacea forensicpsychologicalharminvictimsofchildsexualabuseametaanalyticreview AT alvaromontes forensicpsychologicalharminvictimsofchildsexualabuseametaanalyticreview AT alexandertrinidad forensicpsychologicalharminvictimsofchildsexualabuseametaanalyticreview AT ramonarce forensicpsychologicalharminvictimsofchildsexualabuseametaanalyticreview |