Systemic Analysis of the QS International Research Network Indicator Using Big Data: Regional Inequalities and Recommendations for Improved University Rankings
The International Research Network (IRN) indicator, introduced in the QS (Quacquarelli Symonds) World University Rankings 2024, has generated notable volatility and regional disparities in global university standings. This paper presents a systemic analysis of the IRN indicator across three ranking...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IEEE
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | IEEE Access |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11050413/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850092084086702080 |
|---|---|
| author | Taewan Kim Tae-Kook Kim |
| author_facet | Taewan Kim Tae-Kook Kim |
| author_sort | Taewan Kim |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The International Research Network (IRN) indicator, introduced in the QS (Quacquarelli Symonds) World University Rankings 2024, has generated notable volatility and regional disparities in global university standings. This paper presents a systemic analysis of the IRN indicator across three ranking cycles (2023–2025) using big data methodologies, including descriptive statistics, scatter plots, university size analysis, a case study of South Korean universities in Social Sciences & Management, correlation, and regression analysis. The results reveal pronounced instability in IRN scores, with sharp year-to-year fluctuations and a marked concentration of top-ranked institutions in English-speaking and European regions-98 of the top 100 and 85% of the top 500 IRN-ranked universities originate from these areas. In addition to identifying structural and regional biases, this study examines how effectively IRN functions as a ranking metric, particularly in its ability to predict overall QS performance. Findings from regression analysis show that the contribution of IRN to the overall QS score is minimal, with its predictive power diminishing significantly in the 2025 ranking year. The South Korean case study highlights methodological inconsistencies, showing that the IRN formula disadvantages institutions with multiple partnerships in the same region. These observations are reinforced by correlation and regression analyses, which further confirm that IRN’s explanatory power for overall QS scores weakened in the 2025 ranking year. These findings underscore the need to refine the IRN indicator to enhance transparency, consistency, and inclusivity, thereby supporting a more equitable evaluation of global research networks. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c0e2c23808ec424b9c7ca206ebd60fc0 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2169-3536 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | IEEE |
| record_format | Article |
| series | IEEE Access |
| spelling | doaj-art-c0e2c23808ec424b9c7ca206ebd60fc02025-08-20T02:42:12ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362025-01-011311133511135310.1109/ACCESS.2025.358323611050413Systemic Analysis of the QS International Research Network Indicator Using Big Data: Regional Inequalities and Recommendations for Improved University RankingsTaewan Kim0https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1046-0955Tae-Kook Kim1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8778-7579College of Business Administration, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab EmiratesSchool of Computer and Artificial Intelligence Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan, Republic of KoreaThe International Research Network (IRN) indicator, introduced in the QS (Quacquarelli Symonds) World University Rankings 2024, has generated notable volatility and regional disparities in global university standings. This paper presents a systemic analysis of the IRN indicator across three ranking cycles (2023–2025) using big data methodologies, including descriptive statistics, scatter plots, university size analysis, a case study of South Korean universities in Social Sciences & Management, correlation, and regression analysis. The results reveal pronounced instability in IRN scores, with sharp year-to-year fluctuations and a marked concentration of top-ranked institutions in English-speaking and European regions-98 of the top 100 and 85% of the top 500 IRN-ranked universities originate from these areas. In addition to identifying structural and regional biases, this study examines how effectively IRN functions as a ranking metric, particularly in its ability to predict overall QS performance. Findings from regression analysis show that the contribution of IRN to the overall QS score is minimal, with its predictive power diminishing significantly in the 2025 ranking year. The South Korean case study highlights methodological inconsistencies, showing that the IRN formula disadvantages institutions with multiple partnerships in the same region. These observations are reinforced by correlation and regression analyses, which further confirm that IRN’s explanatory power for overall QS scores weakened in the 2025 ranking year. These findings underscore the need to refine the IRN indicator to enhance transparency, consistency, and inclusivity, thereby supporting a more equitable evaluation of global research networks.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11050413/Big data analyticshigher educationinternational research networkinternational research network (IRN)QS world university rankingsregional inequality |
| spellingShingle | Taewan Kim Tae-Kook Kim Systemic Analysis of the QS International Research Network Indicator Using Big Data: Regional Inequalities and Recommendations for Improved University Rankings IEEE Access Big data analytics higher education international research network international research network (IRN) QS world university rankings regional inequality |
| title | Systemic Analysis of the QS International Research Network Indicator Using Big Data: Regional Inequalities and Recommendations for Improved University Rankings |
| title_full | Systemic Analysis of the QS International Research Network Indicator Using Big Data: Regional Inequalities and Recommendations for Improved University Rankings |
| title_fullStr | Systemic Analysis of the QS International Research Network Indicator Using Big Data: Regional Inequalities and Recommendations for Improved University Rankings |
| title_full_unstemmed | Systemic Analysis of the QS International Research Network Indicator Using Big Data: Regional Inequalities and Recommendations for Improved University Rankings |
| title_short | Systemic Analysis of the QS International Research Network Indicator Using Big Data: Regional Inequalities and Recommendations for Improved University Rankings |
| title_sort | systemic analysis of the qs international research network indicator using big data regional inequalities and recommendations for improved university rankings |
| topic | Big data analytics higher education international research network international research network (IRN) QS world university rankings regional inequality |
| url | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11050413/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT taewankim systemicanalysisoftheqsinternationalresearchnetworkindicatorusingbigdataregionalinequalitiesandrecommendationsforimproveduniversityrankings AT taekookkim systemicanalysisoftheqsinternationalresearchnetworkindicatorusingbigdataregionalinequalitiesandrecommendationsforimproveduniversityrankings |