AI-CAD-Guided Mammographic Assessment of Tumor Size and T Stage: Concordance with MRI for Clinical Staging in Breast Cancer Patients Considered for NAC

<b>Objectives</b>: To evaluate the agreement between AI-CAD-guided mammographic and MRI measurements of tumor size and T stage in breast cancer patients being considered for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study included 144 women (mean age,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ga Eun Park, Kabsoo Shin, Han Song Mun, Bong Joo Kang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-06-01
Series:Tomography
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2379-139X/11/7/72
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849732790436757504
author Ga Eun Park
Kabsoo Shin
Han Song Mun
Bong Joo Kang
author_facet Ga Eun Park
Kabsoo Shin
Han Song Mun
Bong Joo Kang
author_sort Ga Eun Park
collection DOAJ
description <b>Objectives</b>: To evaluate the agreement between AI-CAD-guided mammographic and MRI measurements of tumor size and T stage in breast cancer patients being considered for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study included 144 women (mean age, 52 ± 11 years) with invasive breast cancer who subsequently received NAC and underwent both AI-CAD mammography (score ≥ 10) and pre-treatment MRI. Tumor sizes from AI-CAD contours were compared with MRI using Pearson correlation, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Bland–Altman analysis. Concordance was defined as a ±0.5 cm difference. The contour showing the highest agreement was used to compare T stage with MRI using weighted kappa. <b>Results</b>: The mean AI-CAD abnormality score was 86.3 ± 22.2. Tumor sizes on mammography were 3.0 ± 1.2 cm (inner), 3.8 ± 1.5 cm (middle), and 4.8 ± 2.2 cm (outer), while the MRI-measured tumor size was 4.0 ± 1.9 cm. The middle contour showed the strongest correlation with MRI (r = 0.897; ICC = 0.866), the smallest mean difference (–0.19 cm; limits of agreement, –1.87 to 1.49), and the highest concordance (61.1%). Agreement was higher in mass-only lesions than in NME-involved lesions (ICC = 0.883 vs. 0.775; concordance, 70.9% vs. 46.6%). T stage comparison using the middle contour showed substantial agreement with MRI (κ = 0.743 [95% CI, 0.634–0.852]; agreement, 88.2%), with higher concordance in mass-only lesions (93.0%) than NME-involved lesions (81.0%) and more frequent understaging in the latter (17.2% vs. 2.3%). <b>Conclusions</b>: AI-CAD-guided mammographic assessment using the middle contour demonstrated good agreement with MRI for tumor size and T stage, indicating its value as a supportive tool for clinical staging in MRI-limited settings.
format Article
id doaj-art-c0bb7d9570ed4df5a0d97286f457c350
institution DOAJ
issn 2379-1381
2379-139X
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Tomography
spelling doaj-art-c0bb7d9570ed4df5a0d97286f457c3502025-08-20T03:08:13ZengMDPI AGTomography2379-13812379-139X2025-06-011177210.3390/tomography11070072AI-CAD-Guided Mammographic Assessment of Tumor Size and T Stage: Concordance with MRI for Clinical Staging in Breast Cancer Patients Considered for NACGa Eun Park0Kabsoo Shin1Han Song Mun2Bong Joo Kang3Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of KoreaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea<b>Objectives</b>: To evaluate the agreement between AI-CAD-guided mammographic and MRI measurements of tumor size and T stage in breast cancer patients being considered for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study included 144 women (mean age, 52 ± 11 years) with invasive breast cancer who subsequently received NAC and underwent both AI-CAD mammography (score ≥ 10) and pre-treatment MRI. Tumor sizes from AI-CAD contours were compared with MRI using Pearson correlation, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Bland–Altman analysis. Concordance was defined as a ±0.5 cm difference. The contour showing the highest agreement was used to compare T stage with MRI using weighted kappa. <b>Results</b>: The mean AI-CAD abnormality score was 86.3 ± 22.2. Tumor sizes on mammography were 3.0 ± 1.2 cm (inner), 3.8 ± 1.5 cm (middle), and 4.8 ± 2.2 cm (outer), while the MRI-measured tumor size was 4.0 ± 1.9 cm. The middle contour showed the strongest correlation with MRI (r = 0.897; ICC = 0.866), the smallest mean difference (–0.19 cm; limits of agreement, –1.87 to 1.49), and the highest concordance (61.1%). Agreement was higher in mass-only lesions than in NME-involved lesions (ICC = 0.883 vs. 0.775; concordance, 70.9% vs. 46.6%). T stage comparison using the middle contour showed substantial agreement with MRI (κ = 0.743 [95% CI, 0.634–0.852]; agreement, 88.2%), with higher concordance in mass-only lesions (93.0%) than NME-involved lesions (81.0%) and more frequent understaging in the latter (17.2% vs. 2.3%). <b>Conclusions</b>: AI-CAD-guided mammographic assessment using the middle contour demonstrated good agreement with MRI for tumor size and T stage, indicating its value as a supportive tool for clinical staging in MRI-limited settings.https://www.mdpi.com/2379-139X/11/7/72breast neoplasmsneoadjuvant therapyartificial intelligencemammographyneoplasm staging
spellingShingle Ga Eun Park
Kabsoo Shin
Han Song Mun
Bong Joo Kang
AI-CAD-Guided Mammographic Assessment of Tumor Size and T Stage: Concordance with MRI for Clinical Staging in Breast Cancer Patients Considered for NAC
Tomography
breast neoplasms
neoadjuvant therapy
artificial intelligence
mammography
neoplasm staging
title AI-CAD-Guided Mammographic Assessment of Tumor Size and T Stage: Concordance with MRI for Clinical Staging in Breast Cancer Patients Considered for NAC
title_full AI-CAD-Guided Mammographic Assessment of Tumor Size and T Stage: Concordance with MRI for Clinical Staging in Breast Cancer Patients Considered for NAC
title_fullStr AI-CAD-Guided Mammographic Assessment of Tumor Size and T Stage: Concordance with MRI for Clinical Staging in Breast Cancer Patients Considered for NAC
title_full_unstemmed AI-CAD-Guided Mammographic Assessment of Tumor Size and T Stage: Concordance with MRI for Clinical Staging in Breast Cancer Patients Considered for NAC
title_short AI-CAD-Guided Mammographic Assessment of Tumor Size and T Stage: Concordance with MRI for Clinical Staging in Breast Cancer Patients Considered for NAC
title_sort ai cad guided mammographic assessment of tumor size and t stage concordance with mri for clinical staging in breast cancer patients considered for nac
topic breast neoplasms
neoadjuvant therapy
artificial intelligence
mammography
neoplasm staging
url https://www.mdpi.com/2379-139X/11/7/72
work_keys_str_mv AT gaeunpark aicadguidedmammographicassessmentoftumorsizeandtstageconcordancewithmriforclinicalstaginginbreastcancerpatientsconsideredfornac
AT kabsooshin aicadguidedmammographicassessmentoftumorsizeandtstageconcordancewithmriforclinicalstaginginbreastcancerpatientsconsideredfornac
AT hansongmun aicadguidedmammographicassessmentoftumorsizeandtstageconcordancewithmriforclinicalstaginginbreastcancerpatientsconsideredfornac
AT bongjookang aicadguidedmammographicassessmentoftumorsizeandtstageconcordancewithmriforclinicalstaginginbreastcancerpatientsconsideredfornac