A global review of national guidelines of post‐exposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV

Abstract Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the use of antiretroviral drugs as post‐exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for preventing HIV acquisition for occupational and non‐occupational exposures. To inform the development of global WHO recommendations on PEP, we reviewed national...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcus Maisano, Daniel Tran, Virginia Macdonald, Rachel C. Baggaley, Nathan Ford, Cheryl C. Johnson, Ying Zhang, Jason J. Ong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of the International AIDS Society
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.26333
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832589793409630208
author Marcus Maisano
Daniel Tran
Virginia Macdonald
Rachel C. Baggaley
Nathan Ford
Cheryl C. Johnson
Ying Zhang
Jason J. Ong
author_facet Marcus Maisano
Daniel Tran
Virginia Macdonald
Rachel C. Baggaley
Nathan Ford
Cheryl C. Johnson
Ying Zhang
Jason J. Ong
author_sort Marcus Maisano
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the use of antiretroviral drugs as post‐exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for preventing HIV acquisition for occupational and non‐occupational exposures. To inform the development of global WHO recommendations on PEP, we reviewed national guidelines of PEP for their recommendations. Methods Policies addressing PEP from 38 WHO HIV priority countries were obtained by searching governmental and non‐governmental websites and consulting country and regional experts; these countries were selected based on HIV burden, new HIV acquisitions and the number of HIV‐associated deaths. We reviewed national guidelines to collate data on where PEP can be offered, who can prescribe PEP, PEP eligibility, recommended drug regime, linkage to other interventions, recommended investigations prescribed with PEP, HIV self‐test recommendation related to PEP and stopping rules for PEP. Results In total, 46 guidelines from January 2010 to May 2023 across 36 countries were included, with 70% of documents published during or after 2020. There was significant variation across national guidelines regarding where PEP can be accessed and who can provide or prescribe PEP. Six countries (17%) described being able to access PEP from a primary care facility, four countries (11%) from hospitals and two (6%) from community‐based services. Only three countries (8%) specifically considered dispensing PEP by professionals other than doctors (e.g. nurses). None mentioned pharmacists as prescribers. We found a lack of consistency across countries regarding who is eligible for PEP, regimens used, interventions integrated into PEP provision and recommended investigations for PEP users. No country guidance provided considerations on using HIV self‐tests for starting or stopping PEP. Discussion Despite PEP being recommended for more than three decades, many national policies were lacking in terms of PEP guidance. There are opportunities for countries to update and optimize guidance to consider ways to improve the accessibility of PEP. Greater efforts are needed to support the development of global consensus on how best to implement and integrate PEP, as well as how to include decentralization and task‐sharing to achieve sufficient scale for impact. Conclusions Improving timely access to PEP and promoting PEP adherence could help contribute to reducing the incidence of HIV globally.
format Article
id doaj-art-c08717dc800d427098db988638322ef1
institution Kabale University
issn 1758-2652
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the International AIDS Society
spelling doaj-art-c08717dc800d427098db988638322ef12025-01-24T08:18:08ZengWileyJournal of the International AIDS Society1758-26522025-01-01281n/an/a10.1002/jia2.26333A global review of national guidelines of post‐exposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIVMarcus Maisano0Daniel Tran1Virginia Macdonald2Rachel C. Baggaley3Nathan Ford4Cheryl C. Johnson5Ying Zhang6Jason J. Ong7Melbourne Sexual Health Centre Alfred Health Melbourne Victoria AustraliaMelbourne Medical School The University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria AustraliaGlobal HIV Hepatitis and STI Programmes World Health Organization Geneva SwitzerlandGlobal HIV Hepatitis and STI Programmes World Health Organization Geneva SwitzerlandGlobal HIV Hepatitis and STI Programmes World Health Organization Geneva SwitzerlandGlobal HIV Hepatitis and STI Programmes World Health Organization Geneva SwitzerlandMelbourne Sexual Health Centre Alfred Health Melbourne Victoria AustraliaMelbourne Sexual Health Centre Alfred Health Melbourne Victoria AustraliaAbstract Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the use of antiretroviral drugs as post‐exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for preventing HIV acquisition for occupational and non‐occupational exposures. To inform the development of global WHO recommendations on PEP, we reviewed national guidelines of PEP for their recommendations. Methods Policies addressing PEP from 38 WHO HIV priority countries were obtained by searching governmental and non‐governmental websites and consulting country and regional experts; these countries were selected based on HIV burden, new HIV acquisitions and the number of HIV‐associated deaths. We reviewed national guidelines to collate data on where PEP can be offered, who can prescribe PEP, PEP eligibility, recommended drug regime, linkage to other interventions, recommended investigations prescribed with PEP, HIV self‐test recommendation related to PEP and stopping rules for PEP. Results In total, 46 guidelines from January 2010 to May 2023 across 36 countries were included, with 70% of documents published during or after 2020. There was significant variation across national guidelines regarding where PEP can be accessed and who can provide or prescribe PEP. Six countries (17%) described being able to access PEP from a primary care facility, four countries (11%) from hospitals and two (6%) from community‐based services. Only three countries (8%) specifically considered dispensing PEP by professionals other than doctors (e.g. nurses). None mentioned pharmacists as prescribers. We found a lack of consistency across countries regarding who is eligible for PEP, regimens used, interventions integrated into PEP provision and recommended investigations for PEP users. No country guidance provided considerations on using HIV self‐tests for starting or stopping PEP. Discussion Despite PEP being recommended for more than three decades, many national policies were lacking in terms of PEP guidance. There are opportunities for countries to update and optimize guidance to consider ways to improve the accessibility of PEP. Greater efforts are needed to support the development of global consensus on how best to implement and integrate PEP, as well as how to include decentralization and task‐sharing to achieve sufficient scale for impact. Conclusions Improving timely access to PEP and promoting PEP adherence could help contribute to reducing the incidence of HIV globally.https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.26333HIVnational guidelinesPEPpost‐exposure prophylaxispreventionreview
spellingShingle Marcus Maisano
Daniel Tran
Virginia Macdonald
Rachel C. Baggaley
Nathan Ford
Cheryl C. Johnson
Ying Zhang
Jason J. Ong
A global review of national guidelines of post‐exposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV
Journal of the International AIDS Society
HIV
national guidelines
PEP
post‐exposure prophylaxis
prevention
review
title A global review of national guidelines of post‐exposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV
title_full A global review of national guidelines of post‐exposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV
title_fullStr A global review of national guidelines of post‐exposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV
title_full_unstemmed A global review of national guidelines of post‐exposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV
title_short A global review of national guidelines of post‐exposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV
title_sort global review of national guidelines of post exposure prophylaxis for the prevention of hiv
topic HIV
national guidelines
PEP
post‐exposure prophylaxis
prevention
review
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.26333
work_keys_str_mv AT marcusmaisano aglobalreviewofnationalguidelinesofpostexposureprophylaxisforthepreventionofhiv
AT danieltran aglobalreviewofnationalguidelinesofpostexposureprophylaxisforthepreventionofhiv
AT virginiamacdonald aglobalreviewofnationalguidelinesofpostexposureprophylaxisforthepreventionofhiv
AT rachelcbaggaley aglobalreviewofnationalguidelinesofpostexposureprophylaxisforthepreventionofhiv
AT nathanford aglobalreviewofnationalguidelinesofpostexposureprophylaxisforthepreventionofhiv
AT cherylcjohnson aglobalreviewofnationalguidelinesofpostexposureprophylaxisforthepreventionofhiv
AT yingzhang aglobalreviewofnationalguidelinesofpostexposureprophylaxisforthepreventionofhiv
AT jasonjong aglobalreviewofnationalguidelinesofpostexposureprophylaxisforthepreventionofhiv
AT marcusmaisano globalreviewofnationalguidelinesofpostexposureprophylaxisforthepreventionofhiv
AT danieltran globalreviewofnationalguidelinesofpostexposureprophylaxisforthepreventionofhiv
AT virginiamacdonald globalreviewofnationalguidelinesofpostexposureprophylaxisforthepreventionofhiv
AT rachelcbaggaley globalreviewofnationalguidelinesofpostexposureprophylaxisforthepreventionofhiv
AT nathanford globalreviewofnationalguidelinesofpostexposureprophylaxisforthepreventionofhiv
AT cherylcjohnson globalreviewofnationalguidelinesofpostexposureprophylaxisforthepreventionofhiv
AT yingzhang globalreviewofnationalguidelinesofpostexposureprophylaxisforthepreventionofhiv
AT jasonjong globalreviewofnationalguidelinesofpostexposureprophylaxisforthepreventionofhiv