Comparison of historical Kipchak Turkic texts in terms of case suffixes
Historical Kipchak Turkic is examined in three separate sections: Armenian Alphabet Kipchak Turkic, Mamluk Kipchak Turkic and the Codex Cumanicus. Works written in various fields during the period of the Ayyubid Dynasty, which ruled in Egypt in the 12th and 13th centuries, represent the Mamluk Ki...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Azerbaijani |
| Published: |
Uluslararası Türk Lehçe Araştırmaları Dergisi
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Uluslararası Türk Lehçe Araştırmaları Dergisi |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/4735358 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Historical Kipchak Turkic is examined in three separate sections: Armenian Alphabet
Kipchak Turkic, Mamluk Kipchak Turkic and the Codex Cumanicus. Works written in various
fields during the period of the Ayyubid Dynasty, which ruled in Egypt in the 12th and 13th
centuries, represent the Mamluk Kipchak Turkic period. The Codex Cumanicus, a Latin-script
work compiled from the words of the Kipchaks living within the borders of the Golden Horde in
the late 13th and early 14th centuries, includes texts related to Christianity written for propaganda
purposes, The Turkic works of various natures written in the cities of Kamanets-Podolsk and
Lviv, which were referred to as Western Ukraine in the 16th and 17th centuries, using the
Armenian alphabet, represent the Armenian Alphabet Kipchak Turkic texts. The Mamluk
Kipchak Turkic texts and the Codex Cumanicus were created in approximately the same
centuries but in different geographical areas. The Codex Cumanicus and the Armenian Alphabet
Kipchak Turkic texts, on the other hand, were created in the same geographical area but in
different centuries. These works, produced across a wide time span and geographical area, show
both differences and similarities in terms of phonology and morphology.
In our article, the Mamluk Kipchak Turkic texts, Codex Cumanicus and Armenian
Alphabet Kipchak Turkic texts are analyzed in terms of case suffixes. Similarities and
differences between the texts regarding case suffixes have been identified. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2587-1293 |