U.S. Military Strategy Since Vietnam

Impelled by an overwhelming desire to hunt down those responsible for the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the United States launched military invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq where it toppled regimes that had little or nothing to do with 9/11. There has been a tendency to see these exercise...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John Mueller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani 2023-06-01
Series:Journal of Global Strategic Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ejournal.fisip.unjani.ac.id/index.php/JGSS/article/view/1523
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849771521324613632
author John Mueller
author_facet John Mueller
author_sort John Mueller
collection DOAJ
description Impelled by an overwhelming desire to hunt down those responsible for the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the United States launched military invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq where it toppled regimes that had little or nothing to do with 9/11. There has been a tendency to see these exercises as misguided elements of a coherent plan to establish a “liberal world order” or to apply “liberal hegemony.” In fact however, the militarization of the post-9/11 period has been a glaring, extended, and highly consequential aberration. During the quarter century before that, the United States pursued a foreign policy that was far more restrained militarily, and it seems ready now to resume that tradition after its exhausting 9/11-induced military ventures which have so thoroughly failed to deliver satisfactory results at an acceptable cost. Moreover, public opinion in the United States it is not messianic or in constant search of monsters abroad to destroy. As part of its move back to a more restrained military policy, the United States developed—or further developed—a strategy called “by, with, and through” that was particularly evident in its successful military campaign from 2014 to 2019 against the Islamic State. In this, the United States worked with local forces by providing advice, supplies, and intelligence, and carrying out airstrikes while the locals were expected to take almost all of the casualties. Although hardly new, this approach seems to have a future and is currently being applied in the war in Ukraine.
format Article
id doaj-art-c07f1c5a2fbc4b158ca7c2fde714fbb7
institution DOAJ
issn 2798-4427
language English
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani
record_format Article
series Journal of Global Strategic Studies
spelling doaj-art-c07f1c5a2fbc4b158ca7c2fde714fbb72025-08-20T03:02:36ZengUniversitas Jenderal Achmad YaniJournal of Global Strategic Studies2798-44272023-06-013110.36859/jgss.v3i1.1523U.S. Military Strategy Since VietnamJohn Mueller0The Ohio State University, USA Impelled by an overwhelming desire to hunt down those responsible for the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the United States launched military invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq where it toppled regimes that had little or nothing to do with 9/11. There has been a tendency to see these exercises as misguided elements of a coherent plan to establish a “liberal world order” or to apply “liberal hegemony.” In fact however, the militarization of the post-9/11 period has been a glaring, extended, and highly consequential aberration. During the quarter century before that, the United States pursued a foreign policy that was far more restrained militarily, and it seems ready now to resume that tradition after its exhausting 9/11-induced military ventures which have so thoroughly failed to deliver satisfactory results at an acceptable cost. Moreover, public opinion in the United States it is not messianic or in constant search of monsters abroad to destroy. As part of its move back to a more restrained military policy, the United States developed—or further developed—a strategy called “by, with, and through” that was particularly evident in its successful military campaign from 2014 to 2019 against the Islamic State. In this, the United States worked with local forces by providing advice, supplies, and intelligence, and carrying out airstrikes while the locals were expected to take almost all of the casualties. Although hardly new, this approach seems to have a future and is currently being applied in the war in Ukraine. https://ejournal.fisip.unjani.ac.id/index.php/JGSS/article/view/1523liberal hegemonyukraine9/11Islamic StateVietnam
spellingShingle John Mueller
U.S. Military Strategy Since Vietnam
Journal of Global Strategic Studies
liberal hegemony
ukraine
9/11
Islamic State
Vietnam
title U.S. Military Strategy Since Vietnam
title_full U.S. Military Strategy Since Vietnam
title_fullStr U.S. Military Strategy Since Vietnam
title_full_unstemmed U.S. Military Strategy Since Vietnam
title_short U.S. Military Strategy Since Vietnam
title_sort u s military strategy since vietnam
topic liberal hegemony
ukraine
9/11
Islamic State
Vietnam
url https://ejournal.fisip.unjani.ac.id/index.php/JGSS/article/view/1523
work_keys_str_mv AT johnmueller usmilitarystrategysincevietnam