Reproductive ecology and nest‐site selection of eastern wild turkeys translocated to east Texas
ABSTRACT Despite extensive restoration efforts in eastern Texas, USA, eastern wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris; hereafter, turkey) densities remain considerably lower than in other southern states. To help understand this disparity, we studied reproductive ecology and nest‐site selection...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2016-03-01
|
| Series: | Wildlife Society Bulletin |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.632 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850115866027360256 |
|---|---|
| author | Jason L. Isabelle Warren C. Conway Christopher E. Comer Gary E. Calkins Jason B. Hardin |
| author_facet | Jason L. Isabelle Warren C. Conway Christopher E. Comer Gary E. Calkins Jason B. Hardin |
| author_sort | Jason L. Isabelle |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACT Despite extensive restoration efforts in eastern Texas, USA, eastern wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris; hereafter, turkey) densities remain considerably lower than in other southern states. To help understand this disparity, we studied reproductive ecology and nest‐site selection of turkeys translocated to 4 super‐stocked (≥70 turkeys released) sites in eastern Texas, 2007–2008. Median first nest‐initiation date (16 Apr) was similar between first and second year postrelease and release‐year nesting rates were highly variable (15–77% among sites) and lower than during year 2 at each site (69–92% among sites). Renesting rates and nest success rates across sites and years averaged 21% and 38%, respectively, and poult survival varied 0–51%, averaging 35% across sites and years. Nest sites had greater living woody vegetation, ground and screening cover, and ground cover height than random sites. Successful nests tended to have more (P > 0.05) shrubs, greater visual obstruction, and more and taller ground cover than unsuccessful nests. We recommend thinning pine (Pinus spp.) forests as young as possible, maintaining 0.5–1‐m‐tall vegetation to provide nesting cover, and managing these areas outside the nesting season (Apr–Jun) to minimize disturbance of nesting females. We recommend adults represent ≥50% of male turkeys during translocations to bolster nesting rates during the release year. Given sufficient nesting rates and survival, parameter estimates suggest adequate reproduction for turkey population establishment in eastern Texas. The presence of suitable nesting cover should be an important consideration when selecting future release sites. © 2016 The Wildlife Society. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c00d311ea6c94e8f869b16c0688f53bb |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2328-5540 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2016-03-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Wildlife Society Bulletin |
| spelling | doaj-art-c00d311ea6c94e8f869b16c0688f53bb2025-08-20T02:36:28ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402016-03-01401889610.1002/wsb.632Reproductive ecology and nest‐site selection of eastern wild turkeys translocated to east TexasJason L. Isabelle0Warren C. Conway1Christopher E. Comer2Gary E. Calkins3Jason B. Hardin4Arthur Temple College of Forestry and AgricultureStephen F. Austin State UniversityNacogdochesTX75962USAArthur Temple College of Forestry and AgricultureStephen F. Austin State UniversityNacogdochesTX75962USAArthur Temple College of Forestry and AgricultureStephen F. Austin State UniversityNacogdochesTX75962USATexas Parks and Wildlife DepartmentJasperTX75951USATexas Parks and Wildlife DepartmentOakwoodTX75855USAABSTRACT Despite extensive restoration efforts in eastern Texas, USA, eastern wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris; hereafter, turkey) densities remain considerably lower than in other southern states. To help understand this disparity, we studied reproductive ecology and nest‐site selection of turkeys translocated to 4 super‐stocked (≥70 turkeys released) sites in eastern Texas, 2007–2008. Median first nest‐initiation date (16 Apr) was similar between first and second year postrelease and release‐year nesting rates were highly variable (15–77% among sites) and lower than during year 2 at each site (69–92% among sites). Renesting rates and nest success rates across sites and years averaged 21% and 38%, respectively, and poult survival varied 0–51%, averaging 35% across sites and years. Nest sites had greater living woody vegetation, ground and screening cover, and ground cover height than random sites. Successful nests tended to have more (P > 0.05) shrubs, greater visual obstruction, and more and taller ground cover than unsuccessful nests. We recommend thinning pine (Pinus spp.) forests as young as possible, maintaining 0.5–1‐m‐tall vegetation to provide nesting cover, and managing these areas outside the nesting season (Apr–Jun) to minimize disturbance of nesting females. We recommend adults represent ≥50% of male turkeys during translocations to bolster nesting rates during the release year. Given sufficient nesting rates and survival, parameter estimates suggest adequate reproduction for turkey population establishment in eastern Texas. The presence of suitable nesting cover should be an important consideration when selecting future release sites. © 2016 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.632eastern wild turkeyhabitatMeleagris gallopavo silvestrisnest‐site selectionreproductive ecologysuper‐stocking |
| spellingShingle | Jason L. Isabelle Warren C. Conway Christopher E. Comer Gary E. Calkins Jason B. Hardin Reproductive ecology and nest‐site selection of eastern wild turkeys translocated to east Texas Wildlife Society Bulletin eastern wild turkey habitat Meleagris gallopavo silvestris nest‐site selection reproductive ecology super‐stocking |
| title | Reproductive ecology and nest‐site selection of eastern wild turkeys translocated to east Texas |
| title_full | Reproductive ecology and nest‐site selection of eastern wild turkeys translocated to east Texas |
| title_fullStr | Reproductive ecology and nest‐site selection of eastern wild turkeys translocated to east Texas |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reproductive ecology and nest‐site selection of eastern wild turkeys translocated to east Texas |
| title_short | Reproductive ecology and nest‐site selection of eastern wild turkeys translocated to east Texas |
| title_sort | reproductive ecology and nest site selection of eastern wild turkeys translocated to east texas |
| topic | eastern wild turkey habitat Meleagris gallopavo silvestris nest‐site selection reproductive ecology super‐stocking |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.632 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jasonlisabelle reproductiveecologyandnestsiteselectionofeasternwildturkeystranslocatedtoeasttexas AT warrencconway reproductiveecologyandnestsiteselectionofeasternwildturkeystranslocatedtoeasttexas AT christopherecomer reproductiveecologyandnestsiteselectionofeasternwildturkeystranslocatedtoeasttexas AT garyecalkins reproductiveecologyandnestsiteselectionofeasternwildturkeystranslocatedtoeasttexas AT jasonbhardin reproductiveecologyandnestsiteselectionofeasternwildturkeystranslocatedtoeasttexas |