Comparison of Preservatives for the Prevention of Microbial Spoilage of Apple Pomace During Storage

Apple pomace, a by-product from the production of concentrated juice, is a major contributor to global food waste. Despite its beneficial nutritional profile, apple pomace is predominantly disposed of in landfills. Rapid fermentation and spoilage caused by microorganisms are compounding factors in t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ashley Harratt, Wenyuan Wu, Peyton Strube, Joseph Ceravolo, David Beattie, Tara Pukala, Marta Krasowska, Anton Blencowe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-07-01
Series:Foods
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/14/14/2438
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849246351859122176
author Ashley Harratt
Wenyuan Wu
Peyton Strube
Joseph Ceravolo
David Beattie
Tara Pukala
Marta Krasowska
Anton Blencowe
author_facet Ashley Harratt
Wenyuan Wu
Peyton Strube
Joseph Ceravolo
David Beattie
Tara Pukala
Marta Krasowska
Anton Blencowe
author_sort Ashley Harratt
collection DOAJ
description Apple pomace, a by-product from the production of concentrated juice, is a major contributor to global food waste. Despite its beneficial nutritional profile, apple pomace is predominantly disposed of in landfills. Rapid fermentation and spoilage caused by microorganisms are compounding factors in this demise, despite significant research into upcycling strategies. Thus, there is an unmet need for economical approaches that allow for the preservation of pomace during storage and transportation to centralized processing facilities from regional hubs. To address this challenge, we investigated the potential of different preservatives for preventing microbial growth and the spoilage of apple pomace, including antimicrobials (natamycin and iodine), polysaccharides (chitosan and fucoidan), and acetic acid. Spread plates for total microbial and fungal counts were employed to assess the effectiveness of the treatments. High concentrations (10,000 ppm) of chitosan were effective at reducing the microbial load and inhibiting growth, and in combination with antimicrobials, eliminated all microbes below detectable levels. Nevertheless, acetic acid at an equivalent concentration to commercial vinegar displayed the highest economic potential. Apple pomace submerged in 0.8 M acetic acid (3 kg pomace per liter) resulted in a five-log reduction in the microbial colony-forming units (CFUs) out to 14 days and prevented fermentation and ethanol production. These results provide a foundation for the short-term storage and preservation of apple pomace that could contribute to its upcycling.
format Article
id doaj-art-bfa43be63d994a19b42f886166f3ba33
institution Kabale University
issn 2304-8158
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Foods
spelling doaj-art-bfa43be63d994a19b42f886166f3ba332025-08-20T03:58:31ZengMDPI AGFoods2304-81582025-07-011414243810.3390/foods14142438Comparison of Preservatives for the Prevention of Microbial Spoilage of Apple Pomace During StorageAshley Harratt0Wenyuan Wu1Peyton Strube2Joseph Ceravolo3David Beattie4Tara Pukala5Marta Krasowska6Anton Blencowe7Applied Chemistry and Translational Biomaterials (ACTB) Group, Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, AustraliaApplied Chemistry and Translational Biomaterials (ACTB) Group, Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, AustraliaApplied Chemistry and Translational Biomaterials (ACTB) Group, Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, AustraliaAshton Valley Fresh, Lobethal Rd, Ashton, SA 5137, AustraliaFuture Industries Institute (FII), UniSA Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM), University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5098, AustraliaSchool of Physics, Chemistry and Earth Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, AustraliaFuture Industries Institute (FII), UniSA Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM), University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5098, AustraliaApplied Chemistry and Translational Biomaterials (ACTB) Group, Centre for Pharmaceutical Innovation (CPI), UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, AustraliaApple pomace, a by-product from the production of concentrated juice, is a major contributor to global food waste. Despite its beneficial nutritional profile, apple pomace is predominantly disposed of in landfills. Rapid fermentation and spoilage caused by microorganisms are compounding factors in this demise, despite significant research into upcycling strategies. Thus, there is an unmet need for economical approaches that allow for the preservation of pomace during storage and transportation to centralized processing facilities from regional hubs. To address this challenge, we investigated the potential of different preservatives for preventing microbial growth and the spoilage of apple pomace, including antimicrobials (natamycin and iodine), polysaccharides (chitosan and fucoidan), and acetic acid. Spread plates for total microbial and fungal counts were employed to assess the effectiveness of the treatments. High concentrations (10,000 ppm) of chitosan were effective at reducing the microbial load and inhibiting growth, and in combination with antimicrobials, eliminated all microbes below detectable levels. Nevertheless, acetic acid at an equivalent concentration to commercial vinegar displayed the highest economic potential. Apple pomace submerged in 0.8 M acetic acid (3 kg pomace per liter) resulted in a five-log reduction in the microbial colony-forming units (CFUs) out to 14 days and prevented fermentation and ethanol production. These results provide a foundation for the short-term storage and preservation of apple pomace that could contribute to its upcycling.https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/14/14/2438apple pomacepreservativespoilagefermentationmicrobiology
spellingShingle Ashley Harratt
Wenyuan Wu
Peyton Strube
Joseph Ceravolo
David Beattie
Tara Pukala
Marta Krasowska
Anton Blencowe
Comparison of Preservatives for the Prevention of Microbial Spoilage of Apple Pomace During Storage
Foods
apple pomace
preservative
spoilage
fermentation
microbiology
title Comparison of Preservatives for the Prevention of Microbial Spoilage of Apple Pomace During Storage
title_full Comparison of Preservatives for the Prevention of Microbial Spoilage of Apple Pomace During Storage
title_fullStr Comparison of Preservatives for the Prevention of Microbial Spoilage of Apple Pomace During Storage
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Preservatives for the Prevention of Microbial Spoilage of Apple Pomace During Storage
title_short Comparison of Preservatives for the Prevention of Microbial Spoilage of Apple Pomace During Storage
title_sort comparison of preservatives for the prevention of microbial spoilage of apple pomace during storage
topic apple pomace
preservative
spoilage
fermentation
microbiology
url https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/14/14/2438
work_keys_str_mv AT ashleyharratt comparisonofpreservativesforthepreventionofmicrobialspoilageofapplepomaceduringstorage
AT wenyuanwu comparisonofpreservativesforthepreventionofmicrobialspoilageofapplepomaceduringstorage
AT peytonstrube comparisonofpreservativesforthepreventionofmicrobialspoilageofapplepomaceduringstorage
AT josephceravolo comparisonofpreservativesforthepreventionofmicrobialspoilageofapplepomaceduringstorage
AT davidbeattie comparisonofpreservativesforthepreventionofmicrobialspoilageofapplepomaceduringstorage
AT tarapukala comparisonofpreservativesforthepreventionofmicrobialspoilageofapplepomaceduringstorage
AT martakrasowska comparisonofpreservativesforthepreventionofmicrobialspoilageofapplepomaceduringstorage
AT antonblencowe comparisonofpreservativesforthepreventionofmicrobialspoilageofapplepomaceduringstorage