Comparison of Debris Extrusion and Preparation Time by Traverse, R-Motion Glider C, and Other Glide Path Systems in Severely Curved Canals

This study evaluated debris extrusion by Traverse and R-Motion Glider C during glide path preparation. Seventy-five mesial roots of mandibular molars with severely curved mesiobuccal canals were distributed into five groups: Traverse, R-Motion Glider C, HyFlex EDM Glidepath, One G, and R-Pilot. Duri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taher Al Omari, Layla Hassouneh, Khawlah Albashaireh, Alaa Dkmak, Rami Albanna, Ali Al-Mohammed, Ahmed Jamleh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/ijod/6619901
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849709089364377600
author Taher Al Omari
Layla Hassouneh
Khawlah Albashaireh
Alaa Dkmak
Rami Albanna
Ali Al-Mohammed
Ahmed Jamleh
author_facet Taher Al Omari
Layla Hassouneh
Khawlah Albashaireh
Alaa Dkmak
Rami Albanna
Ali Al-Mohammed
Ahmed Jamleh
author_sort Taher Al Omari
collection DOAJ
description This study evaluated debris extrusion by Traverse and R-Motion Glider C during glide path preparation. Seventy-five mesial roots of mandibular molars with severely curved mesiobuccal canals were distributed into five groups: Traverse, R-Motion Glider C, HyFlex EDM Glidepath, One G, and R-Pilot. During the glide path preparation, debris extruded beyond the apex were collected. The debris weight was calculated (in mg), and the preparation time was recorded (in s). All the systems extruded debris beyond the apex; Traverse extruded the highest amount followed by HyFlex EDM Glidepath, R-Motion Glider C, One G, and R-Pilot (p <0.01). Traverse required almost half the duration of HyFlex EDM Glidepath to prepare the canals (p <0.01), while R-Motion Glider C required the least time (p <0.05). Traverse extruded the highest amount of debris, whilst R-Motion Glider C extruded similar amounts of debris to HyFlex EDM Glidepath, One G, and R-Pilot systems.
format Article
id doaj-art-bf9951249a484e7ab18efa0da2ee7d74
institution DOAJ
issn 1687-8736
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Dentistry
spelling doaj-art-bf9951249a484e7ab18efa0da2ee7d742025-08-20T03:15:26ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87362025-01-01202510.1155/ijod/6619901Comparison of Debris Extrusion and Preparation Time by Traverse, R-Motion Glider C, and Other Glide Path Systems in Severely Curved CanalsTaher Al Omari0Layla Hassouneh1Khawlah Albashaireh2Alaa Dkmak3Rami Albanna4Ali Al-Mohammed5Ahmed Jamleh6Department of Conservative DentistryDepartment of Conservative DentistryDepartment of Conservative DentistryDepartment of Conservative DentistryDepartment of Conservative DentistryDepartment of Conservative DentistryDepartment of Restorative DentistryThis study evaluated debris extrusion by Traverse and R-Motion Glider C during glide path preparation. Seventy-five mesial roots of mandibular molars with severely curved mesiobuccal canals were distributed into five groups: Traverse, R-Motion Glider C, HyFlex EDM Glidepath, One G, and R-Pilot. During the glide path preparation, debris extruded beyond the apex were collected. The debris weight was calculated (in mg), and the preparation time was recorded (in s). All the systems extruded debris beyond the apex; Traverse extruded the highest amount followed by HyFlex EDM Glidepath, R-Motion Glider C, One G, and R-Pilot (p <0.01). Traverse required almost half the duration of HyFlex EDM Glidepath to prepare the canals (p <0.01), while R-Motion Glider C required the least time (p <0.05). Traverse extruded the highest amount of debris, whilst R-Motion Glider C extruded similar amounts of debris to HyFlex EDM Glidepath, One G, and R-Pilot systems.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/ijod/6619901
spellingShingle Taher Al Omari
Layla Hassouneh
Khawlah Albashaireh
Alaa Dkmak
Rami Albanna
Ali Al-Mohammed
Ahmed Jamleh
Comparison of Debris Extrusion and Preparation Time by Traverse, R-Motion Glider C, and Other Glide Path Systems in Severely Curved Canals
International Journal of Dentistry
title Comparison of Debris Extrusion and Preparation Time by Traverse, R-Motion Glider C, and Other Glide Path Systems in Severely Curved Canals
title_full Comparison of Debris Extrusion and Preparation Time by Traverse, R-Motion Glider C, and Other Glide Path Systems in Severely Curved Canals
title_fullStr Comparison of Debris Extrusion and Preparation Time by Traverse, R-Motion Glider C, and Other Glide Path Systems in Severely Curved Canals
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Debris Extrusion and Preparation Time by Traverse, R-Motion Glider C, and Other Glide Path Systems in Severely Curved Canals
title_short Comparison of Debris Extrusion and Preparation Time by Traverse, R-Motion Glider C, and Other Glide Path Systems in Severely Curved Canals
title_sort comparison of debris extrusion and preparation time by traverse r motion glider c and other glide path systems in severely curved canals
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/ijod/6619901
work_keys_str_mv AT taheralomari comparisonofdebrisextrusionandpreparationtimebytraversermotionglidercandotherglidepathsystemsinseverelycurvedcanals
AT laylahassouneh comparisonofdebrisextrusionandpreparationtimebytraversermotionglidercandotherglidepathsystemsinseverelycurvedcanals
AT khawlahalbashaireh comparisonofdebrisextrusionandpreparationtimebytraversermotionglidercandotherglidepathsystemsinseverelycurvedcanals
AT alaadkmak comparisonofdebrisextrusionandpreparationtimebytraversermotionglidercandotherglidepathsystemsinseverelycurvedcanals
AT ramialbanna comparisonofdebrisextrusionandpreparationtimebytraversermotionglidercandotherglidepathsystemsinseverelycurvedcanals
AT alialmohammed comparisonofdebrisextrusionandpreparationtimebytraversermotionglidercandotherglidepathsystemsinseverelycurvedcanals
AT ahmedjamleh comparisonofdebrisextrusionandpreparationtimebytraversermotionglidercandotherglidepathsystemsinseverelycurvedcanals