Prognosis analysis of sacrococcygeal teratoma—compared with patient size

IntroductionAdvancements in prenatal care have underscored the importance of understanding postnatal outcomes and prognosis in sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT). However, giant SCTs continue to pose surgical challenges and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A clear, objective thresho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jueun Park, Suhyeon Ha, Hyunhee Kwon, Seong Chul Kim, Jung-Man Namgoong, Dae Yeon Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2025.1513825/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849394251427741696
author Jueun Park
Suhyeon Ha
Hyunhee Kwon
Seong Chul Kim
Jung-Man Namgoong
Dae Yeon Kim
author_facet Jueun Park
Suhyeon Ha
Hyunhee Kwon
Seong Chul Kim
Jung-Man Namgoong
Dae Yeon Kim
author_sort Jueun Park
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionAdvancements in prenatal care have underscored the importance of understanding postnatal outcomes and prognosis in sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT). However, giant SCTs continue to pose surgical challenges and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A clear, objective threshold for defining a “large” tumor relative to the patient's size remains undefined. This study aimed to establish objective tumor size indicators for predicting surgical outcomes and prognosis.MethodsData from 97 patients diagnosed with and surgically treated for SCT at Asan Medical Center from 2000 to 2021 was retrospectively reviewed. The tumor volume/birthweight ratio (VWR) and tumor length/height at birth ratio (LHR) were measured. Surgical outcomes and prognosis were evaluated based on these measures, including surgical complications, concomitant surgeries, long-term complications, and recurrence.ResultsAfter surgery, 38 patients experienced short-term complications, 18 required additional operations, 16 developed long-term complications, and 14 experienced tumor recurrence. Both VWR and LHR correlated with short and long-term complications, additional surgeries, and recurrence.DiscussionThe small patient population limited the determination of precise cut-off values; however, a significant difference was observed between groups stratified by the most predictive cut-off values. Both objective tumor size indicators were significantly associated with prognosis and surgical outcomes. Notably, both indicators exhibited comparable predictive capabilities without discrepancies.
format Article
id doaj-art-bf8594ddbc4d416e9190b6ce6c7e53d4
institution Kabale University
issn 2296-2360
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pediatrics
spelling doaj-art-bf8594ddbc4d416e9190b6ce6c7e53d42025-08-20T03:40:03ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pediatrics2296-23602025-03-011310.3389/fped.2025.15138251513825Prognosis analysis of sacrococcygeal teratoma—compared with patient sizeJueun ParkSuhyeon HaHyunhee KwonSeong Chul KimJung-Man NamgoongDae Yeon KimIntroductionAdvancements in prenatal care have underscored the importance of understanding postnatal outcomes and prognosis in sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT). However, giant SCTs continue to pose surgical challenges and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A clear, objective threshold for defining a “large” tumor relative to the patient's size remains undefined. This study aimed to establish objective tumor size indicators for predicting surgical outcomes and prognosis.MethodsData from 97 patients diagnosed with and surgically treated for SCT at Asan Medical Center from 2000 to 2021 was retrospectively reviewed. The tumor volume/birthweight ratio (VWR) and tumor length/height at birth ratio (LHR) were measured. Surgical outcomes and prognosis were evaluated based on these measures, including surgical complications, concomitant surgeries, long-term complications, and recurrence.ResultsAfter surgery, 38 patients experienced short-term complications, 18 required additional operations, 16 developed long-term complications, and 14 experienced tumor recurrence. Both VWR and LHR correlated with short and long-term complications, additional surgeries, and recurrence.DiscussionThe small patient population limited the determination of precise cut-off values; however, a significant difference was observed between groups stratified by the most predictive cut-off values. Both objective tumor size indicators were significantly associated with prognosis and surgical outcomes. Notably, both indicators exhibited comparable predictive capabilities without discrepancies.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2025.1513825/fullsacrococcygeal teratomaprognosissurgical complicationpediatric surgerypediatric oncology
spellingShingle Jueun Park
Suhyeon Ha
Hyunhee Kwon
Seong Chul Kim
Jung-Man Namgoong
Dae Yeon Kim
Prognosis analysis of sacrococcygeal teratoma—compared with patient size
Frontiers in Pediatrics
sacrococcygeal teratoma
prognosis
surgical complication
pediatric surgery
pediatric oncology
title Prognosis analysis of sacrococcygeal teratoma—compared with patient size
title_full Prognosis analysis of sacrococcygeal teratoma—compared with patient size
title_fullStr Prognosis analysis of sacrococcygeal teratoma—compared with patient size
title_full_unstemmed Prognosis analysis of sacrococcygeal teratoma—compared with patient size
title_short Prognosis analysis of sacrococcygeal teratoma—compared with patient size
title_sort prognosis analysis of sacrococcygeal teratoma compared with patient size
topic sacrococcygeal teratoma
prognosis
surgical complication
pediatric surgery
pediatric oncology
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2025.1513825/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jueunpark prognosisanalysisofsacrococcygealteratomacomparedwithpatientsize
AT suhyeonha prognosisanalysisofsacrococcygealteratomacomparedwithpatientsize
AT hyunheekwon prognosisanalysisofsacrococcygealteratomacomparedwithpatientsize
AT seongchulkim prognosisanalysisofsacrococcygealteratomacomparedwithpatientsize
AT jungmannamgoong prognosisanalysisofsacrococcygealteratomacomparedwithpatientsize
AT daeyeonkim prognosisanalysisofsacrococcygealteratomacomparedwithpatientsize