Valuing or devaluing nuclear weapons in the war journalism: a cross-national comparative content analysis of news coverage during the Russian war in Ukraine
Abstract This study adopted a comparative content analysis approach to examine the extent of media coverage of the Russian war in Ukraine by three newspapers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and China. Drawing upon the framework of war/peace journalism and valuing/devaluing nuclear weapon...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
2025-08-01
|
| Series: | Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05587-0 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849766848017465344 |
|---|---|
| author | Yu Guo Xiubin Duan Xiaodong Yang |
| author_facet | Yu Guo Xiubin Duan Xiaodong Yang |
| author_sort | Yu Guo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract This study adopted a comparative content analysis approach to examine the extent of media coverage of the Russian war in Ukraine by three newspapers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and China. Drawing upon the framework of war/peace journalism and valuing/devaluing nuclear weapons frames, this study aimed to compare how the newspapers of the three countries have applied different media frames in their coverage of this military conflict. From February 2022 to January 2023, a total of 2868 newspaper articles from the United States (The New York Times, 1619 articles), the United Kingdom (The Guardian, 1073 articles), and China (Global Times, 176 articles) were selected for quantitative content analysis. Results suggested that The New York Times and Global Times portrayed the war more with the war journalism frame, whereas The Guardian presented a stronger peace journalism frame. Regarding the coverage of nuclear weapons, the three newspapers emphasized the values of nuclear weapons with a neutral tone, and they did not associate nuclear weapons values with a predetermined frame. Furthermore, to understand the dynamic relationship between the evolution of war events and changes in media coverage frames, we examined the changes of frames in three newspapers during the four stages of the war development (1. Outbreak; 2. Pushforward; 3. Counteroffensive; 4. Standoff). Results suggested that as the war progressed, The New York Times significantly reduced its coverage of war news and nuclear weapons news, and began to favor a passive tone towards those involving nuclear weapons. When the war reached a stalemate, The Guardian began to significantly increase its coverage of peace journalism frames. At four stages of the war, China’s Global Times remained neutral, with no significant change in its reporting framework. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-bf7674d7148b4b91819bec549edab4e1 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2662-9992 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-08-01 |
| publisher | Springer Nature |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
| spelling | doaj-art-bf7674d7148b4b91819bec549edab4e12025-08-20T03:04:26ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922025-08-0112111210.1057/s41599-025-05587-0Valuing or devaluing nuclear weapons in the war journalism: a cross-national comparative content analysis of news coverage during the Russian war in UkraineYu Guo0Xiubin Duan1Xiaodong Yang2Faculty of Humanities and Arts, Macau University of Science and TechnologyFaculty of Humanities and Arts, Macau University of Science and TechnologySchool of Journalism and Communication, Shandong UniversityAbstract This study adopted a comparative content analysis approach to examine the extent of media coverage of the Russian war in Ukraine by three newspapers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and China. Drawing upon the framework of war/peace journalism and valuing/devaluing nuclear weapons frames, this study aimed to compare how the newspapers of the three countries have applied different media frames in their coverage of this military conflict. From February 2022 to January 2023, a total of 2868 newspaper articles from the United States (The New York Times, 1619 articles), the United Kingdom (The Guardian, 1073 articles), and China (Global Times, 176 articles) were selected for quantitative content analysis. Results suggested that The New York Times and Global Times portrayed the war more with the war journalism frame, whereas The Guardian presented a stronger peace journalism frame. Regarding the coverage of nuclear weapons, the three newspapers emphasized the values of nuclear weapons with a neutral tone, and they did not associate nuclear weapons values with a predetermined frame. Furthermore, to understand the dynamic relationship between the evolution of war events and changes in media coverage frames, we examined the changes of frames in three newspapers during the four stages of the war development (1. Outbreak; 2. Pushforward; 3. Counteroffensive; 4. Standoff). Results suggested that as the war progressed, The New York Times significantly reduced its coverage of war news and nuclear weapons news, and began to favor a passive tone towards those involving nuclear weapons. When the war reached a stalemate, The Guardian began to significantly increase its coverage of peace journalism frames. At four stages of the war, China’s Global Times remained neutral, with no significant change in its reporting framework.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05587-0 |
| spellingShingle | Yu Guo Xiubin Duan Xiaodong Yang Valuing or devaluing nuclear weapons in the war journalism: a cross-national comparative content analysis of news coverage during the Russian war in Ukraine Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
| title | Valuing or devaluing nuclear weapons in the war journalism: a cross-national comparative content analysis of news coverage during the Russian war in Ukraine |
| title_full | Valuing or devaluing nuclear weapons in the war journalism: a cross-national comparative content analysis of news coverage during the Russian war in Ukraine |
| title_fullStr | Valuing or devaluing nuclear weapons in the war journalism: a cross-national comparative content analysis of news coverage during the Russian war in Ukraine |
| title_full_unstemmed | Valuing or devaluing nuclear weapons in the war journalism: a cross-national comparative content analysis of news coverage during the Russian war in Ukraine |
| title_short | Valuing or devaluing nuclear weapons in the war journalism: a cross-national comparative content analysis of news coverage during the Russian war in Ukraine |
| title_sort | valuing or devaluing nuclear weapons in the war journalism a cross national comparative content analysis of news coverage during the russian war in ukraine |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05587-0 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yuguo valuingordevaluingnuclearweaponsinthewarjournalismacrossnationalcomparativecontentanalysisofnewscoverageduringtherussianwarinukraine AT xiubinduan valuingordevaluingnuclearweaponsinthewarjournalismacrossnationalcomparativecontentanalysisofnewscoverageduringtherussianwarinukraine AT xiaodongyang valuingordevaluingnuclearweaponsinthewarjournalismacrossnationalcomparativecontentanalysisofnewscoverageduringtherussianwarinukraine |