Teaching Science Communication to Master’s Students in STEM

Abstract: Introduction: In times of crisis like COVID-19, science communication is a means to provide orientation to the public. Science communication places high demands on the capabilities of those who conduct it, and, thus, interventions should be developed and evaluated for their effectiveness....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julian Fick, Friederike Hendriks, Noemi Kumpmann, Barbara Thies
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hogrefe Publishing Group 2025-02-01
Series:European Journal of Psychology Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1024/2673-8627/a000073
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832541245665181696
author Julian Fick
Friederike Hendriks
Noemi Kumpmann
Barbara Thies
author_facet Julian Fick
Friederike Hendriks
Noemi Kumpmann
Barbara Thies
author_sort Julian Fick
collection DOAJ
description Abstract: Introduction: In times of crisis like COVID-19, science communication is a means to provide orientation to the public. Science communication places high demands on the capabilities of those who conduct it, and, thus, interventions should be developed and evaluated for their effectiveness. Aim: This paper introduces an intervention to support science communication knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, and performance. The manualized one-day training program covered communication basics and specific strategies to enhance comprehensibility, involvement, and credibility in communication. Method: In developing the intervention, we used a constructive alignment approach, resulting in closely linked evaluation, instructional methods (including peer and video feedback), and content. 16 STEM master’s students attended the training program. Results: The evaluation revealed an increase in participants’ knowledge, their positive attitude toward science communication, and self-efficacy beliefs. Coding videos from short presentations additionally revealed an increase in involvement strategy usage but not in comprehensibility or credibility strategy use. Discussion: While we confirmed the overall effectiveness of the intervention, we also discuss the challenges that emerged with assessing the performance and evaluating the evidence. Further, we discuss how psychology can support the handling of public crises through education and by fostering researchers’ science communication skills.
format Article
id doaj-art-bf6758d8fd8147fe994a1ab1a5f5ba6e
institution Kabale University
issn 2673-8627
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Hogrefe Publishing Group
record_format Article
series European Journal of Psychology Open
spelling doaj-art-bf6758d8fd8147fe994a1ab1a5f5ba6e2025-02-04T09:13:17ZengHogrefe Publishing GroupEuropean Journal of Psychology Open2673-86272025-02-0110.1024/2673-8627/a000073Teaching Science Communication to Master’s Students in STEMJulian Fick0Friederike Hendriks1Noemi KumpmannBarbara Thies2Institute for Communication Science, Technische Universität Braunschweig, GermanyInstitute for Communication Science, Technische Universität Braunschweig, GermanyInstitute of Educational Psychology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, GermanyAbstract: Introduction: In times of crisis like COVID-19, science communication is a means to provide orientation to the public. Science communication places high demands on the capabilities of those who conduct it, and, thus, interventions should be developed and evaluated for their effectiveness. Aim: This paper introduces an intervention to support science communication knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, and performance. The manualized one-day training program covered communication basics and specific strategies to enhance comprehensibility, involvement, and credibility in communication. Method: In developing the intervention, we used a constructive alignment approach, resulting in closely linked evaluation, instructional methods (including peer and video feedback), and content. 16 STEM master’s students attended the training program. Results: The evaluation revealed an increase in participants’ knowledge, their positive attitude toward science communication, and self-efficacy beliefs. Coding videos from short presentations additionally revealed an increase in involvement strategy usage but not in comprehensibility or credibility strategy use. Discussion: While we confirmed the overall effectiveness of the intervention, we also discuss the challenges that emerged with assessing the performance and evaluating the evidence. Further, we discuss how psychology can support the handling of public crises through education and by fostering researchers’ science communication skills.https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1024/2673-8627/a000073science communicationevaluationtraining programevidence-basedhigher education
spellingShingle Julian Fick
Friederike Hendriks
Noemi Kumpmann
Barbara Thies
Teaching Science Communication to Master’s Students in STEM
European Journal of Psychology Open
science communication
evaluation
training program
evidence-based
higher education
title Teaching Science Communication to Master’s Students in STEM
title_full Teaching Science Communication to Master’s Students in STEM
title_fullStr Teaching Science Communication to Master’s Students in STEM
title_full_unstemmed Teaching Science Communication to Master’s Students in STEM
title_short Teaching Science Communication to Master’s Students in STEM
title_sort teaching science communication to master s students in stem
topic science communication
evaluation
training program
evidence-based
higher education
url https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1024/2673-8627/a000073
work_keys_str_mv AT julianfick teachingsciencecommunicationtomastersstudentsinstem
AT friederikehendriks teachingsciencecommunicationtomastersstudentsinstem
AT noemikumpmann teachingsciencecommunicationtomastersstudentsinstem
AT barbarathies teachingsciencecommunicationtomastersstudentsinstem