The Added Value of Digital Body Chart Pain Surface Assessment as an Objective Biomarker: Multicohort Study

BackgroundAlthough it has been well-documented that pain intensity alone is not sufficient to assess chronic pain, the objective pain surface encapsulated in a digital tool might present a major interest in the objective assessment of pain. ObjectiveThis study aim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maxime Billot, Amine Ounajim, Maarten Moens, Lisa Goudman, Jean-Philippe Deneuville, Manuel Roulaud, Kévin Nivole, Mathilde Many, Sandrine Baron, Bertille Lorgeoux, Bénédicte Bouche, Lucie Lampert, Romain David, Philippe Rigoard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2025-04-01
Series:Journal of Medical Internet Research
Online Access:https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e62786
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850147447698882560
author Maxime Billot
Amine Ounajim
Maarten Moens
Lisa Goudman
Jean-Philippe Deneuville
Manuel Roulaud
Kévin Nivole
Mathilde Many
Sandrine Baron
Bertille Lorgeoux
Bénédicte Bouche
Lucie Lampert
Romain David
Philippe Rigoard
author_facet Maxime Billot
Amine Ounajim
Maarten Moens
Lisa Goudman
Jean-Philippe Deneuville
Manuel Roulaud
Kévin Nivole
Mathilde Many
Sandrine Baron
Bertille Lorgeoux
Bénédicte Bouche
Lucie Lampert
Romain David
Philippe Rigoard
author_sort Maxime Billot
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundAlthough it has been well-documented that pain intensity alone is not sufficient to assess chronic pain, the objective pain surface encapsulated in a digital tool might present a major interest in the objective assessment of pain. ObjectiveThis study aims to determine the potential added value of pain surface measurement by determining the correlation between pain surface and pain intensity in chronic pain patients. MethodsTwo databases from observational prospective and retrospective longitudinal studies including patients with chronic pain were used in this research. Pain intensity was assessed by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Pain surface (cm²) and pain typology (neuropathic vs mechanical components) were measured by a specific pain mapping digital tool (PRISMap, Poitiers University Hospital). Patients were asked to draw their pain surface on a computerized tactile interface in a predetermined body (adapted from the patient’s BMI). A color code was used to represent pain intensity (very intense, intense, moderate, and low). Simple linear regression was used to assess the proportion of variance in pain surface explained by pain intensity. ResultsThe final analysis included 637 patients with chronic pain. The percentage of variance of the pain surface explained by pain intensity was 1.24% (R²=0.0124; 95% CI 0.11%-6.3%). In addition, 424 (66.6%) patients used more than 1 intensity or color, among whom 218 (34.2%) used 2 intensities or colors, 155 (24.3%) used 3 intensities or colors, and 51 (8%) used 4 intensities or colors. ConclusionsThis study showed that pain intensity and pain surface provide complementary and distinct information that would help to improve pain assessment. Two-thirds of the cohort used 2 or more intensities to describe their pain. Combining pain intensity and pain surface should be strongly considered as a means of improving daily practice assessment of patients with chronic pain in primary and secondary care. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02964130; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02964130?term=PREDIBACK&rank=2
format Article
id doaj-art-bf3990349ab24fb4a5f5e67a96aa8ce6
institution OA Journals
issn 1438-8871
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Medical Internet Research
spelling doaj-art-bf3990349ab24fb4a5f5e67a96aa8ce62025-08-20T02:27:33ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712025-04-0127e6278610.2196/62786The Added Value of Digital Body Chart Pain Surface Assessment as an Objective Biomarker: Multicohort StudyMaxime Billothttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0979-2182Amine Ounajimhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2964-6430Maarten Moenshttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0577-5449Lisa Goudmanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2271-9855Jean-Philippe Deneuvillehttps://orcid.org/0009-0004-2379-1383Manuel Roulaudhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3348-7137Kévin Nivolehttps://orcid.org/0009-0006-9412-5227Mathilde Manyhttps://orcid.org/0009-0009-4664-1747Sandrine Baronhttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-8556-4963Bertille Lorgeouxhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-2895Bénédicte Bouchehttps://orcid.org/0009-0007-7773-2233Lucie Lamperthttps://orcid.org/0009-0001-4821-9103Romain Davidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5753-4722Philippe Rigoardhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9432-5807 BackgroundAlthough it has been well-documented that pain intensity alone is not sufficient to assess chronic pain, the objective pain surface encapsulated in a digital tool might present a major interest in the objective assessment of pain. ObjectiveThis study aims to determine the potential added value of pain surface measurement by determining the correlation between pain surface and pain intensity in chronic pain patients. MethodsTwo databases from observational prospective and retrospective longitudinal studies including patients with chronic pain were used in this research. Pain intensity was assessed by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Pain surface (cm²) and pain typology (neuropathic vs mechanical components) were measured by a specific pain mapping digital tool (PRISMap, Poitiers University Hospital). Patients were asked to draw their pain surface on a computerized tactile interface in a predetermined body (adapted from the patient’s BMI). A color code was used to represent pain intensity (very intense, intense, moderate, and low). Simple linear regression was used to assess the proportion of variance in pain surface explained by pain intensity. ResultsThe final analysis included 637 patients with chronic pain. The percentage of variance of the pain surface explained by pain intensity was 1.24% (R²=0.0124; 95% CI 0.11%-6.3%). In addition, 424 (66.6%) patients used more than 1 intensity or color, among whom 218 (34.2%) used 2 intensities or colors, 155 (24.3%) used 3 intensities or colors, and 51 (8%) used 4 intensities or colors. ConclusionsThis study showed that pain intensity and pain surface provide complementary and distinct information that would help to improve pain assessment. Two-thirds of the cohort used 2 or more intensities to describe their pain. Combining pain intensity and pain surface should be strongly considered as a means of improving daily practice assessment of patients with chronic pain in primary and secondary care. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02964130; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02964130?term=PREDIBACK&rank=2https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e62786
spellingShingle Maxime Billot
Amine Ounajim
Maarten Moens
Lisa Goudman
Jean-Philippe Deneuville
Manuel Roulaud
Kévin Nivole
Mathilde Many
Sandrine Baron
Bertille Lorgeoux
Bénédicte Bouche
Lucie Lampert
Romain David
Philippe Rigoard
The Added Value of Digital Body Chart Pain Surface Assessment as an Objective Biomarker: Multicohort Study
Journal of Medical Internet Research
title The Added Value of Digital Body Chart Pain Surface Assessment as an Objective Biomarker: Multicohort Study
title_full The Added Value of Digital Body Chart Pain Surface Assessment as an Objective Biomarker: Multicohort Study
title_fullStr The Added Value of Digital Body Chart Pain Surface Assessment as an Objective Biomarker: Multicohort Study
title_full_unstemmed The Added Value of Digital Body Chart Pain Surface Assessment as an Objective Biomarker: Multicohort Study
title_short The Added Value of Digital Body Chart Pain Surface Assessment as an Objective Biomarker: Multicohort Study
title_sort added value of digital body chart pain surface assessment as an objective biomarker multicohort study
url https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e62786
work_keys_str_mv AT maximebillot theaddedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT amineounajim theaddedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT maartenmoens theaddedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT lisagoudman theaddedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT jeanphilippedeneuville theaddedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT manuelroulaud theaddedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT kevinnivole theaddedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT mathildemany theaddedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT sandrinebaron theaddedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT bertillelorgeoux theaddedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT benedictebouche theaddedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT lucielampert theaddedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT romaindavid theaddedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT philipperigoard theaddedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT maximebillot addedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT amineounajim addedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT maartenmoens addedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT lisagoudman addedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT jeanphilippedeneuville addedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT manuelroulaud addedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT kevinnivole addedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT mathildemany addedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT sandrinebaron addedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT bertillelorgeoux addedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT benedictebouche addedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT lucielampert addedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT romaindavid addedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy
AT philipperigoard addedvalueofdigitalbodychartpainsurfaceassessmentasanobjectivebiomarkermulticohortstudy