Price estimation and visual evaluation of actual white fabrics used for dress shirts and their photographic images

Consumers recognize the appearance and texture of fabric through viewing photographic images on E-commerce. However, the relationship between evaluations of the actual fabric and its image remains unclear. To understand the evaluation difference between actual fabric and its image, we investigated t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maruyama Tomoya, Kim KyoungOk, Takatera Masayuki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2024-11-01
Series:AUTEX Research Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/aut-2024-0008
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850128024398200832
author Maruyama Tomoya
Kim KyoungOk
Takatera Masayuki
author_facet Maruyama Tomoya
Kim KyoungOk
Takatera Masayuki
author_sort Maruyama Tomoya
collection DOAJ
description Consumers recognize the appearance and texture of fabric through viewing photographic images on E-commerce. However, the relationship between evaluations of the actual fabric and its image remains unclear. To understand the evaluation difference between actual fabric and its image, we investigated the relationship of visual evaluations including the price evaluation between actual white fabrics used for dress shirts and their photographic images concerning the online purchase of items presented by their photos. Participants evaluated the impressions of 24 white fabrics (actual fabrics and their images), comparing them with a standard white fabric. Participants also estimated the prices of shirts hypothetically made from different fabrics. We compared the difference between the results for actual fabrics and images. We also carried out a principal component analysis of those impressions and examined the relationship among principal component analysis results, weave structure, and fabric materials and price estimation. In a comparison of actual fabric and image evaluations, the impression of glossiness and brightness differed, with the actual fabrics being rated significantly higher in terms of glossiness and brightness. These differences are due to the difference in media (i.e., direct viewing versus screen display), although the visual environment of the lighting and displays may have had an effect. In principal component analysis, the first principal components were Delicateness and Glossiness for both actual fabrics and their images. The second principal components were Lightness and Coolness for the images of fabrics and Lightness, Coolness, and Softness for the actual fabrics. Fabrics evaluated highly in the first principal component had high price estimations. Thus, it is clear that Delicateness and Glossiness affected the price evaluation for both actual white fabrics and their images. Fabrics with a high value of Delicateness and Glossiness were a poplin made of at least 95% cotton. In contrast, fabrics containing linen and having a small repeating dobby pattern with roughness were evaluated as having low Delicateness and Glossiness and were assessed at a lower price. Additionally, even in the case of blended fabrics such as a cotton–polyester fabric, the expected price was high for diagonal patterns such as stripes and checks. These results will be helpful in the procurement of fabrics with which to make clothing and in the marketing of clothing for E-commerce.
format Article
id doaj-art-bf25d971373048de804b0e36506f2af2
institution OA Journals
issn 2300-0929
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series AUTEX Research Journal
spelling doaj-art-bf25d971373048de804b0e36506f2af22025-08-20T02:33:31ZengDe GruyterAUTEX Research Journal2300-09292024-11-0124133741610.1515/aut-2024-0008Price estimation and visual evaluation of actual white fabrics used for dress shirts and their photographic imagesMaruyama Tomoya0Kim KyoungOk1Takatera Masayuki2Graduate School of Science and Technology, Shinshu University, 3-15-1 Tokida, Ueda, Nagano, 386-8567, JapanInstitute for Fiber Engineering and Science (IFES), Faculty of Textile Science and Technology, Shinshu University, 3-15-1 Tokida, Ueda, Nagano, 386-8567, JapanInstitute for Fiber Engineering and Science (IFES), Faculty of Textile Science and Technology, Shinshu University, 3-15-1 Tokida, Ueda, Nagano, 386-8567, JapanConsumers recognize the appearance and texture of fabric through viewing photographic images on E-commerce. However, the relationship between evaluations of the actual fabric and its image remains unclear. To understand the evaluation difference between actual fabric and its image, we investigated the relationship of visual evaluations including the price evaluation between actual white fabrics used for dress shirts and their photographic images concerning the online purchase of items presented by their photos. Participants evaluated the impressions of 24 white fabrics (actual fabrics and their images), comparing them with a standard white fabric. Participants also estimated the prices of shirts hypothetically made from different fabrics. We compared the difference between the results for actual fabrics and images. We also carried out a principal component analysis of those impressions and examined the relationship among principal component analysis results, weave structure, and fabric materials and price estimation. In a comparison of actual fabric and image evaluations, the impression of glossiness and brightness differed, with the actual fabrics being rated significantly higher in terms of glossiness and brightness. These differences are due to the difference in media (i.e., direct viewing versus screen display), although the visual environment of the lighting and displays may have had an effect. In principal component analysis, the first principal components were Delicateness and Glossiness for both actual fabrics and their images. The second principal components were Lightness and Coolness for the images of fabrics and Lightness, Coolness, and Softness for the actual fabrics. Fabrics evaluated highly in the first principal component had high price estimations. Thus, it is clear that Delicateness and Glossiness affected the price evaluation for both actual white fabrics and their images. Fabrics with a high value of Delicateness and Glossiness were a poplin made of at least 95% cotton. In contrast, fabrics containing linen and having a small repeating dobby pattern with roughness were evaluated as having low Delicateness and Glossiness and were assessed at a lower price. Additionally, even in the case of blended fabrics such as a cotton–polyester fabric, the expected price was high for diagonal patterns such as stripes and checks. These results will be helpful in the procurement of fabrics with which to make clothing and in the marketing of clothing for E-commerce.https://doi.org/10.1515/aut-2024-0008price estimationactual fabricphotographic image of fabricwhite fabric for dress shirte-commerce
spellingShingle Maruyama Tomoya
Kim KyoungOk
Takatera Masayuki
Price estimation and visual evaluation of actual white fabrics used for dress shirts and their photographic images
AUTEX Research Journal
price estimation
actual fabric
photographic image of fabric
white fabric for dress shirt
e-commerce
title Price estimation and visual evaluation of actual white fabrics used for dress shirts and their photographic images
title_full Price estimation and visual evaluation of actual white fabrics used for dress shirts and their photographic images
title_fullStr Price estimation and visual evaluation of actual white fabrics used for dress shirts and their photographic images
title_full_unstemmed Price estimation and visual evaluation of actual white fabrics used for dress shirts and their photographic images
title_short Price estimation and visual evaluation of actual white fabrics used for dress shirts and their photographic images
title_sort price estimation and visual evaluation of actual white fabrics used for dress shirts and their photographic images
topic price estimation
actual fabric
photographic image of fabric
white fabric for dress shirt
e-commerce
url https://doi.org/10.1515/aut-2024-0008
work_keys_str_mv AT maruyamatomoya priceestimationandvisualevaluationofactualwhitefabricsusedfordressshirtsandtheirphotographicimages
AT kimkyoungok priceestimationandvisualevaluationofactualwhitefabricsusedfordressshirtsandtheirphotographicimages
AT takateramasayuki priceestimationandvisualevaluationofactualwhitefabricsusedfordressshirtsandtheirphotographicimages