Retention in the Bukhali trial in Soweto, South Africa: a qualitative analysis using self-determination theory

Introduction There is limited research on applying theory to retention in complex intervention trials. To address this gap, this study aimed to qualitatively examine retention in the Bukhali randomised controlled trial, from the perspective of trial participants and staff, through the lens of self-d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shane A Norris, Stephen Lye, Catherine E Draper, Nosibusiso Tshetu, Nokuthula Nkosi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2025-02-01
Series:BMJ Global Health
Online Access:https://gh.bmj.com/content/10/2/e017729.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823859010870181888
author Shane A Norris
Stephen Lye
Catherine E Draper
Nosibusiso Tshetu
Nokuthula Nkosi
author_facet Shane A Norris
Stephen Lye
Catherine E Draper
Nosibusiso Tshetu
Nokuthula Nkosi
author_sort Shane A Norris
collection DOAJ
description Introduction There is limited research on applying theory to retention in complex intervention trials. To address this gap, this study aimed to qualitatively examine retention in the Bukhali randomised controlled trial, from the perspective of trial participants and staff, through the lens of self-determination theory (SDT). The Bukhali trial is part of the Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative in Soweto, South Africa, with young women.Methods Nine focus group discussions were used to generate data from Bukhali trial staff (n=45, 23–64 years), and participants, including those currently enrolled (n=16, 25–31 years) and those who had withdrawn from the trial (n=20, 24–32 years). A codebook thematic approach was taken to data analysis; SDT was used to develop a conceptual model to analyse the data in context. The main themes identified were external influences on the trial, trial implementing environment, controlled motivation and intrinsic autonomous motivation.Results Our findings highlighted the contextual issues influencing the trial, including participants’ socioeconomic circumstances, and the presence or absence of social support, the trial complexity and participant burden. Issues related to controlled motivation comprised challenges of staying in contact, financial incentives and food, health services provided and other incentives. We also identified aspects of the trial supporting participants’ psychological needs of autonomy, competence and relatedness, which in turn contributed to their intrinsic autonomous motivation. These included participants’ interest in the trial and its relevance to them; participants’ sense of agency, meaning and purpose through their involvement; the building of their knowledge and awareness about their health; relating to other participants and the relationships built with staff and being treated well.Conclusion SDT provides a helpful frame for a contextualised understanding of the complexity of retention of Bukhali trial participants (longitudinal study and intervention). These findings have relevance for trials in under-resourced settings.
format Article
id doaj-art-bf2400bce42b4a67a27862714e16acaf
institution Kabale University
issn 2059-7908
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Global Health
spelling doaj-art-bf2400bce42b4a67a27862714e16acaf2025-02-11T09:40:10ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Global Health2059-79082025-02-0110210.1136/bmjgh-2024-017729Retention in the Bukhali trial in Soweto, South Africa: a qualitative analysis using self-determination theoryShane A Norris0Stephen Lye1Catherine E Draper2Nosibusiso Tshetu3Nokuthula Nkosi4SAMRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaSAMRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaSAMRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaSAMRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaIntroduction There is limited research on applying theory to retention in complex intervention trials. To address this gap, this study aimed to qualitatively examine retention in the Bukhali randomised controlled trial, from the perspective of trial participants and staff, through the lens of self-determination theory (SDT). The Bukhali trial is part of the Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative in Soweto, South Africa, with young women.Methods Nine focus group discussions were used to generate data from Bukhali trial staff (n=45, 23–64 years), and participants, including those currently enrolled (n=16, 25–31 years) and those who had withdrawn from the trial (n=20, 24–32 years). A codebook thematic approach was taken to data analysis; SDT was used to develop a conceptual model to analyse the data in context. The main themes identified were external influences on the trial, trial implementing environment, controlled motivation and intrinsic autonomous motivation.Results Our findings highlighted the contextual issues influencing the trial, including participants’ socioeconomic circumstances, and the presence or absence of social support, the trial complexity and participant burden. Issues related to controlled motivation comprised challenges of staying in contact, financial incentives and food, health services provided and other incentives. We also identified aspects of the trial supporting participants’ psychological needs of autonomy, competence and relatedness, which in turn contributed to their intrinsic autonomous motivation. These included participants’ interest in the trial and its relevance to them; participants’ sense of agency, meaning and purpose through their involvement; the building of their knowledge and awareness about their health; relating to other participants and the relationships built with staff and being treated well.Conclusion SDT provides a helpful frame for a contextualised understanding of the complexity of retention of Bukhali trial participants (longitudinal study and intervention). These findings have relevance for trials in under-resourced settings.https://gh.bmj.com/content/10/2/e017729.full
spellingShingle Shane A Norris
Stephen Lye
Catherine E Draper
Nosibusiso Tshetu
Nokuthula Nkosi
Retention in the Bukhali trial in Soweto, South Africa: a qualitative analysis using self-determination theory
BMJ Global Health
title Retention in the Bukhali trial in Soweto, South Africa: a qualitative analysis using self-determination theory
title_full Retention in the Bukhali trial in Soweto, South Africa: a qualitative analysis using self-determination theory
title_fullStr Retention in the Bukhali trial in Soweto, South Africa: a qualitative analysis using self-determination theory
title_full_unstemmed Retention in the Bukhali trial in Soweto, South Africa: a qualitative analysis using self-determination theory
title_short Retention in the Bukhali trial in Soweto, South Africa: a qualitative analysis using self-determination theory
title_sort retention in the bukhali trial in soweto south africa a qualitative analysis using self determination theory
url https://gh.bmj.com/content/10/2/e017729.full
work_keys_str_mv AT shaneanorris retentioninthebukhalitrialinsowetosouthafricaaqualitativeanalysisusingselfdeterminationtheory
AT stephenlye retentioninthebukhalitrialinsowetosouthafricaaqualitativeanalysisusingselfdeterminationtheory
AT catherineedraper retentioninthebukhalitrialinsowetosouthafricaaqualitativeanalysisusingselfdeterminationtheory
AT nosibusisotshetu retentioninthebukhalitrialinsowetosouthafricaaqualitativeanalysisusingselfdeterminationtheory
AT nokuthulankosi retentioninthebukhalitrialinsowetosouthafricaaqualitativeanalysisusingselfdeterminationtheory