Comparison of perioperative blood loss of three different posterior nonfusion decompression operations for single-segment lumbar disc herniation
ObjectiveThe perioperative blood loss of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID), unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) and open fenestration discectomy (OPD) was compared to provide reference for the selection of clinical surgical methods.MethodsThe clinical data of 260 patients with...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Neurology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2025.1551742/full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850118181116444672 |
|---|---|
| author | Liren Wang Liren Wang Xing Guo Xing Guo Zhenjie Song Zhenjie Song Hanwu Tang Hanwu Tang Haiwei Guo Haiwei Guo Ying Li Ying Li |
| author_facet | Liren Wang Liren Wang Xing Guo Xing Guo Zhenjie Song Zhenjie Song Hanwu Tang Hanwu Tang Haiwei Guo Haiwei Guo Ying Li Ying Li |
| author_sort | Liren Wang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ObjectiveThe perioperative blood loss of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID), unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) and open fenestration discectomy (OPD) was compared to provide reference for the selection of clinical surgical methods.MethodsThe clinical data of 260 patients with lumbar disc herniation who underwent PEID, UBE or OPD surgery from March 2020 to February 2024 were retrospectively analyzed, including 100 patients who received PEID surgery, 100 patients who received UBE surgery, and 60 patients who received OPD surgery. Total blood loss and hidden blood loss were calculated according to the linear equation of circulating blood volume, and the hidden blood loss was statistically compared among the three groups.ResultsIn terms of perioperative total blood loss and visible blood loss, the OPD group had the highest total blood loss (408.46 ± 116.89 mL) and visible blood loss (127.17 ± 24.22 mL), followed by the UBE group (304.46 ± 87.55 mL and 51.00 ± 11.15 mL respectively). The PEID group was the least (152.87 ± 54.48 mL and 18.75 ± 5.09 mL). Both the overall differences among the three groups and the pairwise differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). As for hidden blood loss, the results indicated significant differences between the PEID and UBE groups (p < 0.05), as well as between the PEID and OPD groups (p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed between the OPD group and the UBE group (p = 0.22). In terms of operation time, UBE group had the longest operation time (129.67 ± 30.56 min), and OPD group had the shortest operation time (78.73 ± 11.80 min), with statistical difference (p < 0.05).ConclusionIn terms of perioperative blood loss, the PEID group was more minimally invasive than the UBE and OPD groups. Compared with OPD group, UBE group was less invasive, but did not significantly reduce the amount of hidden blood loss after surgery. In terms of operation time, UBE group had the longest operation time and OPD group had the shortest operation time. In terms of hospitalization days, OPD group had the longest hospital stay. In terms of total hospitalization cost, UBE group had the highest total hospitalization cost and PEID group had the lowest total hospitalization cost. The clinician should choose the appropriate surgical plan according to the actual situation of the patient to ensure the efficacy and safety of the operation. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-befcd0f874ad4bfcb5cda0c28ce4bb31 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1664-2295 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Neurology |
| spelling | doaj-art-befcd0f874ad4bfcb5cda0c28ce4bb312025-08-20T02:35:56ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952025-06-011610.3389/fneur.2025.15517421551742Comparison of perioperative blood loss of three different posterior nonfusion decompression operations for single-segment lumbar disc herniationLiren Wang0Liren Wang1Xing Guo2Xing Guo3Zhenjie Song4Zhenjie Song5Hanwu Tang6Hanwu Tang7Haiwei Guo8Haiwei Guo9Ying Li10Ying Li11The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaGuangdong Research Institute for Orthopedics and Traumatology of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaGuangdong Research Institute for Orthopedics and Traumatology of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaGuangdong Research Institute for Orthopedics and Traumatology of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaGuangdong Research Institute for Orthopedics and Traumatology of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaGuangdong Research Institute for Orthopedics and Traumatology of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaGuangdong Research Institute for Orthopedics and Traumatology of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaObjectiveThe perioperative blood loss of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID), unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) and open fenestration discectomy (OPD) was compared to provide reference for the selection of clinical surgical methods.MethodsThe clinical data of 260 patients with lumbar disc herniation who underwent PEID, UBE or OPD surgery from March 2020 to February 2024 were retrospectively analyzed, including 100 patients who received PEID surgery, 100 patients who received UBE surgery, and 60 patients who received OPD surgery. Total blood loss and hidden blood loss were calculated according to the linear equation of circulating blood volume, and the hidden blood loss was statistically compared among the three groups.ResultsIn terms of perioperative total blood loss and visible blood loss, the OPD group had the highest total blood loss (408.46 ± 116.89 mL) and visible blood loss (127.17 ± 24.22 mL), followed by the UBE group (304.46 ± 87.55 mL and 51.00 ± 11.15 mL respectively). The PEID group was the least (152.87 ± 54.48 mL and 18.75 ± 5.09 mL). Both the overall differences among the three groups and the pairwise differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). As for hidden blood loss, the results indicated significant differences between the PEID and UBE groups (p < 0.05), as well as between the PEID and OPD groups (p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed between the OPD group and the UBE group (p = 0.22). In terms of operation time, UBE group had the longest operation time (129.67 ± 30.56 min), and OPD group had the shortest operation time (78.73 ± 11.80 min), with statistical difference (p < 0.05).ConclusionIn terms of perioperative blood loss, the PEID group was more minimally invasive than the UBE and OPD groups. Compared with OPD group, UBE group was less invasive, but did not significantly reduce the amount of hidden blood loss after surgery. In terms of operation time, UBE group had the longest operation time and OPD group had the shortest operation time. In terms of hospitalization days, OPD group had the longest hospital stay. In terms of total hospitalization cost, UBE group had the highest total hospitalization cost and PEID group had the lowest total hospitalization cost. The clinician should choose the appropriate surgical plan according to the actual situation of the patient to ensure the efficacy and safety of the operation.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2025.1551742/fullperioperative blood losspercutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomyunilateral biportal endoscopicopen fenestration discectomylumbar disc herniationhidden blood loss |
| spellingShingle | Liren Wang Liren Wang Xing Guo Xing Guo Zhenjie Song Zhenjie Song Hanwu Tang Hanwu Tang Haiwei Guo Haiwei Guo Ying Li Ying Li Comparison of perioperative blood loss of three different posterior nonfusion decompression operations for single-segment lumbar disc herniation Frontiers in Neurology perioperative blood loss percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy unilateral biportal endoscopic open fenestration discectomy lumbar disc herniation hidden blood loss |
| title | Comparison of perioperative blood loss of three different posterior nonfusion decompression operations for single-segment lumbar disc herniation |
| title_full | Comparison of perioperative blood loss of three different posterior nonfusion decompression operations for single-segment lumbar disc herniation |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of perioperative blood loss of three different posterior nonfusion decompression operations for single-segment lumbar disc herniation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of perioperative blood loss of three different posterior nonfusion decompression operations for single-segment lumbar disc herniation |
| title_short | Comparison of perioperative blood loss of three different posterior nonfusion decompression operations for single-segment lumbar disc herniation |
| title_sort | comparison of perioperative blood loss of three different posterior nonfusion decompression operations for single segment lumbar disc herniation |
| topic | perioperative blood loss percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy unilateral biportal endoscopic open fenestration discectomy lumbar disc herniation hidden blood loss |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2025.1551742/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lirenwang comparisonofperioperativebloodlossofthreedifferentposteriornonfusiondecompressionoperationsforsinglesegmentlumbardischerniation AT lirenwang comparisonofperioperativebloodlossofthreedifferentposteriornonfusiondecompressionoperationsforsinglesegmentlumbardischerniation AT xingguo comparisonofperioperativebloodlossofthreedifferentposteriornonfusiondecompressionoperationsforsinglesegmentlumbardischerniation AT xingguo comparisonofperioperativebloodlossofthreedifferentposteriornonfusiondecompressionoperationsforsinglesegmentlumbardischerniation AT zhenjiesong comparisonofperioperativebloodlossofthreedifferentposteriornonfusiondecompressionoperationsforsinglesegmentlumbardischerniation AT zhenjiesong comparisonofperioperativebloodlossofthreedifferentposteriornonfusiondecompressionoperationsforsinglesegmentlumbardischerniation AT hanwutang comparisonofperioperativebloodlossofthreedifferentposteriornonfusiondecompressionoperationsforsinglesegmentlumbardischerniation AT hanwutang comparisonofperioperativebloodlossofthreedifferentposteriornonfusiondecompressionoperationsforsinglesegmentlumbardischerniation AT haiweiguo comparisonofperioperativebloodlossofthreedifferentposteriornonfusiondecompressionoperationsforsinglesegmentlumbardischerniation AT haiweiguo comparisonofperioperativebloodlossofthreedifferentposteriornonfusiondecompressionoperationsforsinglesegmentlumbardischerniation AT yingli comparisonofperioperativebloodlossofthreedifferentposteriornonfusiondecompressionoperationsforsinglesegmentlumbardischerniation AT yingli comparisonofperioperativebloodlossofthreedifferentposteriornonfusiondecompressionoperationsforsinglesegmentlumbardischerniation |