The Influence of Cochlear Implant-Based Electric Stimulation on the Electrophysiological Characteristics of Cultured Spiral Ganglion Neurons

Background. Cochlear implant-based electrical stimulation may be an important reason to induce the residual hearing loss after cochlear implantation. In our previous study, we found that charge-balanced biphasic electrical stimulation inhibited the neurite growth of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Na Shen, Lei Zhou, Bin Lai, Shufeng Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Neural Plasticity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3108490
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832550588523479040
author Na Shen
Lei Zhou
Bin Lai
Shufeng Li
author_facet Na Shen
Lei Zhou
Bin Lai
Shufeng Li
author_sort Na Shen
collection DOAJ
description Background. Cochlear implant-based electrical stimulation may be an important reason to induce the residual hearing loss after cochlear implantation. In our previous study, we found that charge-balanced biphasic electrical stimulation inhibited the neurite growth of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) and decreased Schwann cell density in vitro. In this study, we want to know whether cochlear implant-based electrical stimulation can induce the change of electrical activity in cultured SGNs. Methods. Spiral ganglion neuron electrical stimulation in vitro model is established using the devices delivering cochlear implant-based electrical stimulation. After 48 h treatment by 50 μA or 100 μA electrical stimulation, the action potential (AP) and voltage depended calcium current (ICa) of SGNs are recorded using whole-cell electrophysiological method. Results. The results show that the ICa of SGNs is decreased significantly in 50 μA and 100 μA electrical stimulation groups. The reversal potential of ICa is nearly +80 mV in control SGN, but the reversal potential decreases to +50 mV in 50 μA and 100 μA electrical stimulation groups. Interestingly, the AP amplitude, the AP latency, and the AP duration of SGNs have no statistically significant differences in all three groups. Conclusion. Our study suggests cochlear implant-based electrical stimulation only significantly inhibit the ICa of cultured SGNs but has no effect on the firing of AP, and the relation of ICa inhibition and SGN damage induced by electrical stimulation and its mechanism needs to be further studied.
format Article
id doaj-art-bed3914fdd2849dfa3d3442602617710
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-5904
1687-5443
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Neural Plasticity
spelling doaj-art-bed3914fdd2849dfa3d34426026177102025-02-03T06:06:29ZengWileyNeural Plasticity2090-59041687-54432020-01-01202010.1155/2020/31084903108490The Influence of Cochlear Implant-Based Electric Stimulation on the Electrophysiological Characteristics of Cultured Spiral Ganglion NeuronsNa Shen0Lei Zhou1Bin Lai2Shufeng Li3Department of Otolaryngology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, ChinaENT Institute and Department of Otolaryngology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaBackground. Cochlear implant-based electrical stimulation may be an important reason to induce the residual hearing loss after cochlear implantation. In our previous study, we found that charge-balanced biphasic electrical stimulation inhibited the neurite growth of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) and decreased Schwann cell density in vitro. In this study, we want to know whether cochlear implant-based electrical stimulation can induce the change of electrical activity in cultured SGNs. Methods. Spiral ganglion neuron electrical stimulation in vitro model is established using the devices delivering cochlear implant-based electrical stimulation. After 48 h treatment by 50 μA or 100 μA electrical stimulation, the action potential (AP) and voltage depended calcium current (ICa) of SGNs are recorded using whole-cell electrophysiological method. Results. The results show that the ICa of SGNs is decreased significantly in 50 μA and 100 μA electrical stimulation groups. The reversal potential of ICa is nearly +80 mV in control SGN, but the reversal potential decreases to +50 mV in 50 μA and 100 μA electrical stimulation groups. Interestingly, the AP amplitude, the AP latency, and the AP duration of SGNs have no statistically significant differences in all three groups. Conclusion. Our study suggests cochlear implant-based electrical stimulation only significantly inhibit the ICa of cultured SGNs but has no effect on the firing of AP, and the relation of ICa inhibition and SGN damage induced by electrical stimulation and its mechanism needs to be further studied.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3108490
spellingShingle Na Shen
Lei Zhou
Bin Lai
Shufeng Li
The Influence of Cochlear Implant-Based Electric Stimulation on the Electrophysiological Characteristics of Cultured Spiral Ganglion Neurons
Neural Plasticity
title The Influence of Cochlear Implant-Based Electric Stimulation on the Electrophysiological Characteristics of Cultured Spiral Ganglion Neurons
title_full The Influence of Cochlear Implant-Based Electric Stimulation on the Electrophysiological Characteristics of Cultured Spiral Ganglion Neurons
title_fullStr The Influence of Cochlear Implant-Based Electric Stimulation on the Electrophysiological Characteristics of Cultured Spiral Ganglion Neurons
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Cochlear Implant-Based Electric Stimulation on the Electrophysiological Characteristics of Cultured Spiral Ganglion Neurons
title_short The Influence of Cochlear Implant-Based Electric Stimulation on the Electrophysiological Characteristics of Cultured Spiral Ganglion Neurons
title_sort influence of cochlear implant based electric stimulation on the electrophysiological characteristics of cultured spiral ganglion neurons
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3108490
work_keys_str_mv AT nashen theinfluenceofcochlearimplantbasedelectricstimulationontheelectrophysiologicalcharacteristicsofculturedspiralganglionneurons
AT leizhou theinfluenceofcochlearimplantbasedelectricstimulationontheelectrophysiologicalcharacteristicsofculturedspiralganglionneurons
AT binlai theinfluenceofcochlearimplantbasedelectricstimulationontheelectrophysiologicalcharacteristicsofculturedspiralganglionneurons
AT shufengli theinfluenceofcochlearimplantbasedelectricstimulationontheelectrophysiologicalcharacteristicsofculturedspiralganglionneurons
AT nashen influenceofcochlearimplantbasedelectricstimulationontheelectrophysiologicalcharacteristicsofculturedspiralganglionneurons
AT leizhou influenceofcochlearimplantbasedelectricstimulationontheelectrophysiologicalcharacteristicsofculturedspiralganglionneurons
AT binlai influenceofcochlearimplantbasedelectricstimulationontheelectrophysiologicalcharacteristicsofculturedspiralganglionneurons
AT shufengli influenceofcochlearimplantbasedelectricstimulationontheelectrophysiologicalcharacteristicsofculturedspiralganglionneurons