Percutaneous A1 pulley with corticosteroid injection for trigger finger release: a systematic review

Abstract Background Corticosteroid injection (CI) is one of the first-line treatments for trigger finger (TF) before escalation to surgical procedures such as percutaneous A1 pulley (PAP) release. This systematic review compares outcomes of concurrent PAP and CI for trigger finger release (TFR). Met...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jimmy Wen, Burhaan Syed, Ramy Khalil, Mouhamad Shehabat, Meraj Alam, Romteen Sedighi, Daniel Razick, Muzammil Akhtar, Adam Razick, Foad Elahi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-04-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05776-2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850042633753198592
author Jimmy Wen
Burhaan Syed
Ramy Khalil
Mouhamad Shehabat
Meraj Alam
Romteen Sedighi
Daniel Razick
Muzammil Akhtar
Adam Razick
Foad Elahi
author_facet Jimmy Wen
Burhaan Syed
Ramy Khalil
Mouhamad Shehabat
Meraj Alam
Romteen Sedighi
Daniel Razick
Muzammil Akhtar
Adam Razick
Foad Elahi
author_sort Jimmy Wen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Corticosteroid injection (CI) is one of the first-line treatments for trigger finger (TF) before escalation to surgical procedures such as percutaneous A1 pulley (PAP) release. This systematic review compares outcomes of concurrent PAP and CI for trigger finger release (TFR). Methods A systematic search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Study variables included the number of patients, mean age, mean follow-up, affected finger, Quinnell grading, return to activity, pre-and post-operative patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and complications. Results Seven studies were included, with 685 patients with a mean age of 52.0 years (range of 38.0 to 58.9) and a mean follow-up time of 22 weeks (range 1 week to 52 weeks). Throughout these studies, PAP and CI were performed on 243 thumbs, 115 index fingers, 189 middle fingers, 138 ring fingers, and 10 small fingers. PAP and CI reported satisfaction and pain resolution for 96.2% (five studies) of patients. Additionally, all patients returned to activity, sports, or work (three studies). Conclusion Concurrent PAP and CI positively affect clinical outcomes, PROs, and is a well-tolerated procedure with a low rate of complications.
format Article
id doaj-art-bea07d3d4da24504a1d46e0ba30eebba
institution DOAJ
issn 1749-799X
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj-art-bea07d3d4da24504a1d46e0ba30eebba2025-08-20T02:55:29ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2025-04-012011910.1186/s13018-025-05776-2Percutaneous A1 pulley with corticosteroid injection for trigger finger release: a systematic reviewJimmy Wen0Burhaan Syed1Ramy Khalil2Mouhamad Shehabat3Meraj Alam4Romteen Sedighi5Daniel Razick6Muzammil Akhtar7Adam Razick8Foad Elahi9California Northstate University College of MedicineCalifornia Northstate University College of MedicineCalifornia Northstate University College of MedicineCalifornia Northstate University College of MedicineCalifornia Northstate University College of MedicineCalifornia Northstate University College of MedicineCalifornia Northstate University College of MedicineCalifornia Northstate University College of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaCalifornia Center of Pain Medicine & RehabilitationAbstract Background Corticosteroid injection (CI) is one of the first-line treatments for trigger finger (TF) before escalation to surgical procedures such as percutaneous A1 pulley (PAP) release. This systematic review compares outcomes of concurrent PAP and CI for trigger finger release (TFR). Methods A systematic search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Study variables included the number of patients, mean age, mean follow-up, affected finger, Quinnell grading, return to activity, pre-and post-operative patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and complications. Results Seven studies were included, with 685 patients with a mean age of 52.0 years (range of 38.0 to 58.9) and a mean follow-up time of 22 weeks (range 1 week to 52 weeks). Throughout these studies, PAP and CI were performed on 243 thumbs, 115 index fingers, 189 middle fingers, 138 ring fingers, and 10 small fingers. PAP and CI reported satisfaction and pain resolution for 96.2% (five studies) of patients. Additionally, all patients returned to activity, sports, or work (three studies). Conclusion Concurrent PAP and CI positively affect clinical outcomes, PROs, and is a well-tolerated procedure with a low rate of complications.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05776-2Minimally invasiveA1 pulleyCorticosteroidTenosynovitisPainTendon entrapment
spellingShingle Jimmy Wen
Burhaan Syed
Ramy Khalil
Mouhamad Shehabat
Meraj Alam
Romteen Sedighi
Daniel Razick
Muzammil Akhtar
Adam Razick
Foad Elahi
Percutaneous A1 pulley with corticosteroid injection for trigger finger release: a systematic review
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Minimally invasive
A1 pulley
Corticosteroid
Tenosynovitis
Pain
Tendon entrapment
title Percutaneous A1 pulley with corticosteroid injection for trigger finger release: a systematic review
title_full Percutaneous A1 pulley with corticosteroid injection for trigger finger release: a systematic review
title_fullStr Percutaneous A1 pulley with corticosteroid injection for trigger finger release: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous A1 pulley with corticosteroid injection for trigger finger release: a systematic review
title_short Percutaneous A1 pulley with corticosteroid injection for trigger finger release: a systematic review
title_sort percutaneous a1 pulley with corticosteroid injection for trigger finger release a systematic review
topic Minimally invasive
A1 pulley
Corticosteroid
Tenosynovitis
Pain
Tendon entrapment
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05776-2
work_keys_str_mv AT jimmywen percutaneousa1pulleywithcorticosteroidinjectionfortriggerfingerreleaseasystematicreview
AT burhaansyed percutaneousa1pulleywithcorticosteroidinjectionfortriggerfingerreleaseasystematicreview
AT ramykhalil percutaneousa1pulleywithcorticosteroidinjectionfortriggerfingerreleaseasystematicreview
AT mouhamadshehabat percutaneousa1pulleywithcorticosteroidinjectionfortriggerfingerreleaseasystematicreview
AT merajalam percutaneousa1pulleywithcorticosteroidinjectionfortriggerfingerreleaseasystematicreview
AT romteensedighi percutaneousa1pulleywithcorticosteroidinjectionfortriggerfingerreleaseasystematicreview
AT danielrazick percutaneousa1pulleywithcorticosteroidinjectionfortriggerfingerreleaseasystematicreview
AT muzammilakhtar percutaneousa1pulleywithcorticosteroidinjectionfortriggerfingerreleaseasystematicreview
AT adamrazick percutaneousa1pulleywithcorticosteroidinjectionfortriggerfingerreleaseasystematicreview
AT foadelahi percutaneousa1pulleywithcorticosteroidinjectionfortriggerfingerreleaseasystematicreview