Truth, Proof, Rights and the Rule of Law in Criminal Adjudication
A comment on S. J. Summers «Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof and Rights»
Saved in:
| Main Author: | John Dugald Jackson |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitat de Girona. Cátedra de Cultura Jurídica
2023-04-01
|
| Series: | Quaestio Facti |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revistes.udg.edu/quaestio-facti/article/view/22838 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The Procedural Law of State Administrative Courts As The Rule of Adjudication: Exploring Hart’s Theory
by: Aan Efendi, et al.
Published: (2024-07-01) -
Reply to the Comments on Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof and Rights
by: Sarah Jane Summers
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Lay Adjudication in Europe: The Rise and Fall of the Traditional Jury
by: John Jackson, et al.
Published: (2015-03-01) -
Disambiguating the Concept and Application of Islamic Law to the Civil Procedure and Adjudication
by: Mohsen Kazemi, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
The Proof of the Truthful in the Works of the Mystics
by: hamid Parsania
Published: (2010-05-01)