Immune checkpoint inhibitors in high‐grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Paradigm shift emphasizing organ preservation

Abstract Objective The aim was to evaluate the role of immune check point inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with high‐grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who are managed endoscopically when nephroureterectomy (NU) is not feasible, such as in patients who are either not candidates for NU or dec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahmoud Khalil, Andrew Fishman, Anna Komorowski, Israel Franco, Michael Grasso III
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-05-01
Series:BJUI Compass
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.335
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850099907910696960
author Mahmoud Khalil
Andrew Fishman
Anna Komorowski
Israel Franco
Michael Grasso III
author_facet Mahmoud Khalil
Andrew Fishman
Anna Komorowski
Israel Franco
Michael Grasso III
author_sort Mahmoud Khalil
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective The aim was to evaluate the role of immune check point inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with high‐grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who are managed endoscopically when nephroureterectomy (NU) is not feasible, such as in patients who are either not candidates for NU or decline extirpative surgery. Methods All patients diagnosed with high‐grade UTUC and managed endoscopically between January 1996 and August 2022 were included in the study. Subsequently, patients were categorised based on their use of ICIs into group 1 (patients who did not receive ICIs) and group 2 (patients who received ICIs). Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis, while a multivariable regression model was employed to analyse the impact of clinical characteristics on survival. Results A total of 29 patients were enrolled, with 14 in group 1 and 15 in group 2. Both groups exhibited similar demographic and disease characteristics, including multifocality, laterality and initial tumour size. The median follow‐up period was 29.2 months. Notably, group 2 demonstrated significantly enhanced overall and metastasis‐free survival rates compared to group 1. At 47.8 months, the overall survival rate was 0% (all patients died) in group 1, whereas it was 85.7% in group 2. Similarly, the metastasis‐free survival rate was 0% (all patients had metastatic disease) in group 1 at 40.6 months, whereas it reached 78.0% in group 2. The multivariable analysis indicated a correlation between ICI usage and improved survival outcomes, with a hazard ratio of 0.002. Conclusion Utilisation of adjuvant ICIs in the setting of endoscopically treated patients with high‐grade UTUC is associated with significantly improved survival rates. ICIs should be considered in this patient population, however, more studies with larger sample size are warranted.
format Article
id doaj-art-be68000a24ad4f37bc956f8b82e52e1c
institution DOAJ
issn 2688-4526
language English
publishDate 2024-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series BJUI Compass
spelling doaj-art-be68000a24ad4f37bc956f8b82e52e1c2025-08-20T02:40:24ZengWileyBJUI Compass2688-45262024-05-015560461010.1002/bco2.335Immune checkpoint inhibitors in high‐grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Paradigm shift emphasizing organ preservationMahmoud Khalil0Andrew Fishman1Anna Komorowski2Israel Franco3Michael Grasso III4Department of Urology Phelps Hospital, Northwell Health Sleepy Hollow New York USADepartment of Urology Phelps Hospital, Northwell Health Sleepy Hollow New York USADepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology Phelps Hospital, Northwell Health Sleepy Hollow New York USADepartment of Urology Yale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USADepartment of Urology Phelps Hospital, Northwell Health Sleepy Hollow New York USAAbstract Objective The aim was to evaluate the role of immune check point inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with high‐grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who are managed endoscopically when nephroureterectomy (NU) is not feasible, such as in patients who are either not candidates for NU or decline extirpative surgery. Methods All patients diagnosed with high‐grade UTUC and managed endoscopically between January 1996 and August 2022 were included in the study. Subsequently, patients were categorised based on their use of ICIs into group 1 (patients who did not receive ICIs) and group 2 (patients who received ICIs). Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis, while a multivariable regression model was employed to analyse the impact of clinical characteristics on survival. Results A total of 29 patients were enrolled, with 14 in group 1 and 15 in group 2. Both groups exhibited similar demographic and disease characteristics, including multifocality, laterality and initial tumour size. The median follow‐up period was 29.2 months. Notably, group 2 demonstrated significantly enhanced overall and metastasis‐free survival rates compared to group 1. At 47.8 months, the overall survival rate was 0% (all patients died) in group 1, whereas it was 85.7% in group 2. Similarly, the metastasis‐free survival rate was 0% (all patients had metastatic disease) in group 1 at 40.6 months, whereas it reached 78.0% in group 2. The multivariable analysis indicated a correlation between ICI usage and improved survival outcomes, with a hazard ratio of 0.002. Conclusion Utilisation of adjuvant ICIs in the setting of endoscopically treated patients with high‐grade UTUC is associated with significantly improved survival rates. ICIs should be considered in this patient population, however, more studies with larger sample size are warranted.https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.335high gradeimmune checkpoint inhibitorsimmunotherapyrenal urothelial carcinomaupper tract urothelial carcinomaureteral carcinoma
spellingShingle Mahmoud Khalil
Andrew Fishman
Anna Komorowski
Israel Franco
Michael Grasso III
Immune checkpoint inhibitors in high‐grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Paradigm shift emphasizing organ preservation
BJUI Compass
high grade
immune checkpoint inhibitors
immunotherapy
renal urothelial carcinoma
upper tract urothelial carcinoma
ureteral carcinoma
title Immune checkpoint inhibitors in high‐grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Paradigm shift emphasizing organ preservation
title_full Immune checkpoint inhibitors in high‐grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Paradigm shift emphasizing organ preservation
title_fullStr Immune checkpoint inhibitors in high‐grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Paradigm shift emphasizing organ preservation
title_full_unstemmed Immune checkpoint inhibitors in high‐grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Paradigm shift emphasizing organ preservation
title_short Immune checkpoint inhibitors in high‐grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Paradigm shift emphasizing organ preservation
title_sort immune checkpoint inhibitors in high grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma paradigm shift emphasizing organ preservation
topic high grade
immune checkpoint inhibitors
immunotherapy
renal urothelial carcinoma
upper tract urothelial carcinoma
ureteral carcinoma
url https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.335
work_keys_str_mv AT mahmoudkhalil immunecheckpointinhibitorsinhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaparadigmshiftemphasizingorganpreservation
AT andrewfishman immunecheckpointinhibitorsinhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaparadigmshiftemphasizingorganpreservation
AT annakomorowski immunecheckpointinhibitorsinhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaparadigmshiftemphasizingorganpreservation
AT israelfranco immunecheckpointinhibitorsinhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaparadigmshiftemphasizingorganpreservation
AT michaelgrassoiii immunecheckpointinhibitorsinhighgradeuppertracturothelialcarcinomaparadigmshiftemphasizingorganpreservation