The effects of technical factors on the fractal dimension in different dental radiographic images

PurposeThe aim of this study was to assess the impact of exposure parameters and image formats on fractal dimension (FD) values in periapical, panoramic, and CBCT images.Materials and MethodsSeven dry male mandibles were selected, and a Gutta-Percha was used to identify identical regions of interest...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mehmet Amuk, Gamze Şirin Sarıbal, Nihal Ersu, Serkan Yılmaz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Istanbul University 2023-06-01
Series:European Oral Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/7E63A5DDE9D249E4BACE59E930B07242
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850205412554440704
author Mehmet Amuk
Gamze Şirin Sarıbal
Nihal Ersu
Serkan Yılmaz
author_facet Mehmet Amuk
Gamze Şirin Sarıbal
Nihal Ersu
Serkan Yılmaz
author_sort Mehmet Amuk
collection DOAJ
description PurposeThe aim of this study was to assess the impact of exposure parameters and image formats on fractal dimension (FD) values in periapical, panoramic, and CBCT images.Materials and MethodsSeven dry male mandibles were selected, and a Gutta-Percha was used to identify identical regions of interest. A periapical radiograph was taken with 60 kVp/7 mA and exported in DICOM, JPEG, TIFF, and PNG formats. Nine periapical radiographs (60, 65, 70 kVp; 4, 5, 6 mA) were taken from seven dry human mandibles. Additionally, 12 panoramic radiographs (60, 70, 81, 90 kVp; 5, 8, 13 mA) and 10 CBCT images (with different scanning options and FOVs) were taken from each mandible. FDs were measured from a standard area.ResultsThe intra-class correlation coefficient demonstrated a high degree of agreement between observers. No significant difference was found between TIFF and PNG formats (p > 0.05). The highest FD mean was found in TIFF format, while the lowest FD mean was found in JPEG format (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between kVp and mA settings in periapical images. In panoramic images, a significant difference was found at 90 kVp (p = 0.001) and 13 mA (p < 0.001), with lower FD values observed at these settings. There was no significant difference between FOV and resolution in CBCT images (p > 0.05).ConclusionThe format of the image can influence FD. For periapical and panoramic radiographs, kVp and mA settings do not have a significant impact on FD. However, fractal analysis may not be an ideal method for evaluating three-dimensional images, such as those obtained with CBCT.
format Article
id doaj-art-be4d3cd2b7c340509291f837a2b8291c
institution OA Journals
issn 2651-2823
language English
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Istanbul University
record_format Article
series European Oral Research
spelling doaj-art-be4d3cd2b7c340509291f837a2b8291c2025-08-20T02:11:05ZengIstanbul UniversityEuropean Oral Research2651-28232023-06-01572687410.26650/eor.2023984422123456The effects of technical factors on the fractal dimension in different dental radiographic imagesMehmet Amuk0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6390-7169Gamze Şirin Sarıbal1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5191-377XNihal Ersu2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1356-9971Serkan Yılmaz3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7149-0324Erciyes Üniversitesi, Kayseri, TurkiyeErciyes Üniversitesi, Kayseri, TurkiyeErciyes Üniversitesi, Kayseri, TurkiyeErciyes Üniversitesi, Kayseri, TurkiyePurposeThe aim of this study was to assess the impact of exposure parameters and image formats on fractal dimension (FD) values in periapical, panoramic, and CBCT images.Materials and MethodsSeven dry male mandibles were selected, and a Gutta-Percha was used to identify identical regions of interest. A periapical radiograph was taken with 60 kVp/7 mA and exported in DICOM, JPEG, TIFF, and PNG formats. Nine periapical radiographs (60, 65, 70 kVp; 4, 5, 6 mA) were taken from seven dry human mandibles. Additionally, 12 panoramic radiographs (60, 70, 81, 90 kVp; 5, 8, 13 mA) and 10 CBCT images (with different scanning options and FOVs) were taken from each mandible. FDs were measured from a standard area.ResultsThe intra-class correlation coefficient demonstrated a high degree of agreement between observers. No significant difference was found between TIFF and PNG formats (p > 0.05). The highest FD mean was found in TIFF format, while the lowest FD mean was found in JPEG format (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between kVp and mA settings in periapical images. In panoramic images, a significant difference was found at 90 kVp (p = 0.001) and 13 mA (p < 0.001), with lower FD values observed at these settings. There was no significant difference between FOV and resolution in CBCT images (p > 0.05).ConclusionThe format of the image can influence FD. For periapical and panoramic radiographs, kVp and mA settings do not have a significant impact on FD. However, fractal analysis may not be an ideal method for evaluating three-dimensional images, such as those obtained with CBCT.https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/7E63A5DDE9D249E4BACE59E930B07242fractal analysisexposure parametersimage formatdental radiographycbct
spellingShingle Mehmet Amuk
Gamze Şirin Sarıbal
Nihal Ersu
Serkan Yılmaz
The effects of technical factors on the fractal dimension in different dental radiographic images
European Oral Research
fractal analysis
exposure parameters
image format
dental radiography
cbct
title The effects of technical factors on the fractal dimension in different dental radiographic images
title_full The effects of technical factors on the fractal dimension in different dental radiographic images
title_fullStr The effects of technical factors on the fractal dimension in different dental radiographic images
title_full_unstemmed The effects of technical factors on the fractal dimension in different dental radiographic images
title_short The effects of technical factors on the fractal dimension in different dental radiographic images
title_sort effects of technical factors on the fractal dimension in different dental radiographic images
topic fractal analysis
exposure parameters
image format
dental radiography
cbct
url https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/7E63A5DDE9D249E4BACE59E930B07242
work_keys_str_mv AT mehmetamuk theeffectsoftechnicalfactorsonthefractaldimensionindifferentdentalradiographicimages
AT gamzesirinsarıbal theeffectsoftechnicalfactorsonthefractaldimensionindifferentdentalradiographicimages
AT nihalersu theeffectsoftechnicalfactorsonthefractaldimensionindifferentdentalradiographicimages
AT serkanyılmaz theeffectsoftechnicalfactorsonthefractaldimensionindifferentdentalradiographicimages
AT mehmetamuk effectsoftechnicalfactorsonthefractaldimensionindifferentdentalradiographicimages
AT gamzesirinsarıbal effectsoftechnicalfactorsonthefractaldimensionindifferentdentalradiographicimages
AT nihalersu effectsoftechnicalfactorsonthefractaldimensionindifferentdentalradiographicimages
AT serkanyılmaz effectsoftechnicalfactorsonthefractaldimensionindifferentdentalradiographicimages