Economic and Clinical Impact of Stroke and Warfarin Use for Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation

**Background:** Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common clinical problem and potent risk factor for stroke. However, real-world effectiveness and outcomes for AF patients are not well described. **Objective:** To compare the economic and clinical impact of stroke and warfarin use on patients with nonv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li Wang, Elyse Fritschel, Onur Baser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia Data Analytics, LLC 2013-11-01
Series:Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.36469/9852
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860372029833216
author Li Wang
Elyse Fritschel
Onur Baser
author_facet Li Wang
Elyse Fritschel
Onur Baser
author_sort Li Wang
collection DOAJ
description **Background:** Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common clinical problem and potent risk factor for stroke. However, real-world effectiveness and outcomes for AF patients are not well described. **Objective:** To compare the economic and clinical impact of stroke and warfarin use on patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). **Methods:** This was a retrospective analysis of medical and pharmacy claims of NVAF patients from a large commercial health insurance database (01/01/2005-12/31/2007). Patients were grouped according to stroke or warfarin prescription status. For all groups, demographic, clinical, and pharmaceutical characteristics were analyzed descriptively. Risk-adjusted overall and cardiovascular-related hospital readmission rates in 30 days, length of stay (LOS), clinical outcomes, and health care costs were assessed using propensity score matching. Costs were adjusted to 2007 U.S. dollars using the medical component of the U.S. Consumer Price Index. **Results:** Out of 18,575 NVAF patients, 3.1% (n=575) experienced a stroke event. Stroke patients were older on average (78.94 vs. 77.28 years, p-value<0.0001) with significantly higher risk-adjusted inpatient mortality (7.14% vs. 2.09%, p-value<0.0001), emergency room visits (79.97% vs. 46.34%, p-value<0.0001), and average LOS measures (overall: 10.20 vs. 6.83 days, p<0.0001; cardiovascular-related: 8.35 vs. 5.90 days, p-value<0.0001). Despite the similarity in Charlson Comorbidity Index scores compared to non-stroke controls, stroke patients significantly higher clinical outcome rates during follow-up for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), ischemic attack, major and minor bleeding patients (p-values<0.0100), and the total cost incurred was nearly three times greater ($33,506 vs. $13,921, p-values<0.0001). NVAF patients were commonly prescribed warfarin (65.60%) and appeared to have a lower prevalence of clinical outcomes, while not incurring significantly higher follow-up costs compared to those not prescribed warfarin ($12,739, standard deviation [SD]=$19,842 vs. $15,358; SD=$45,446; p-value>0.0500). However, a significantly greater proportion of patients with major and minor bleeding were prescribed a combination of warfarin and antiplatelets than those without these events. **Conclusions:** A stroke after an NVAF diagnosis has a major clinical impact, which translates into a significant economic burden for patients. Warfarin prescriptions did not significantly impact total health care costs, though caution is advised to minimize hemorrhagic events.
format Article
id doaj-art-be2d99a6a8d44f5faae056faacf0d119
institution Kabale University
issn 2327-2236
language English
publishDate 2013-11-01
publisher Columbia Data Analytics, LLC
record_format Article
series Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
spelling doaj-art-be2d99a6a8d44f5faae056faacf0d1192025-02-10T16:12:46ZengColumbia Data Analytics, LLCJournal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research2327-22362013-11-0111Economic and Clinical Impact of Stroke and Warfarin Use for Patients with Non-valvular Atrial FibrillationLi WangElyse FritschelOnur Baser**Background:** Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common clinical problem and potent risk factor for stroke. However, real-world effectiveness and outcomes for AF patients are not well described. **Objective:** To compare the economic and clinical impact of stroke and warfarin use on patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). **Methods:** This was a retrospective analysis of medical and pharmacy claims of NVAF patients from a large commercial health insurance database (01/01/2005-12/31/2007). Patients were grouped according to stroke or warfarin prescription status. For all groups, demographic, clinical, and pharmaceutical characteristics were analyzed descriptively. Risk-adjusted overall and cardiovascular-related hospital readmission rates in 30 days, length of stay (LOS), clinical outcomes, and health care costs were assessed using propensity score matching. Costs were adjusted to 2007 U.S. dollars using the medical component of the U.S. Consumer Price Index. **Results:** Out of 18,575 NVAF patients, 3.1% (n=575) experienced a stroke event. Stroke patients were older on average (78.94 vs. 77.28 years, p-value<0.0001) with significantly higher risk-adjusted inpatient mortality (7.14% vs. 2.09%, p-value<0.0001), emergency room visits (79.97% vs. 46.34%, p-value<0.0001), and average LOS measures (overall: 10.20 vs. 6.83 days, p<0.0001; cardiovascular-related: 8.35 vs. 5.90 days, p-value<0.0001). Despite the similarity in Charlson Comorbidity Index scores compared to non-stroke controls, stroke patients significantly higher clinical outcome rates during follow-up for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), ischemic attack, major and minor bleeding patients (p-values<0.0100), and the total cost incurred was nearly three times greater ($33,506 vs. $13,921, p-values<0.0001). NVAF patients were commonly prescribed warfarin (65.60%) and appeared to have a lower prevalence of clinical outcomes, while not incurring significantly higher follow-up costs compared to those not prescribed warfarin ($12,739, standard deviation [SD]=$19,842 vs. $15,358; SD=$45,446; p-value>0.0500). However, a significantly greater proportion of patients with major and minor bleeding were prescribed a combination of warfarin and antiplatelets than those without these events. **Conclusions:** A stroke after an NVAF diagnosis has a major clinical impact, which translates into a significant economic burden for patients. Warfarin prescriptions did not significantly impact total health care costs, though caution is advised to minimize hemorrhagic events.https://doi.org/10.36469/9852
spellingShingle Li Wang
Elyse Fritschel
Onur Baser
Economic and Clinical Impact of Stroke and Warfarin Use for Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
title Economic and Clinical Impact of Stroke and Warfarin Use for Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation
title_full Economic and Clinical Impact of Stroke and Warfarin Use for Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation
title_fullStr Economic and Clinical Impact of Stroke and Warfarin Use for Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Economic and Clinical Impact of Stroke and Warfarin Use for Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation
title_short Economic and Clinical Impact of Stroke and Warfarin Use for Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation
title_sort economic and clinical impact of stroke and warfarin use for patients with non valvular atrial fibrillation
url https://doi.org/10.36469/9852
work_keys_str_mv AT liwang economicandclinicalimpactofstrokeandwarfarinuseforpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT elysefritschel economicandclinicalimpactofstrokeandwarfarinuseforpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT onurbaser economicandclinicalimpactofstrokeandwarfarinuseforpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation