What makes wildlife wild? How identity may shape the public trust versus wildlife privatization debate
ABSTRACT Wildlife conservation policy discussions in the United States and Canada often revolve around historical accounts of the success of wildlife management grounded in the public trust doctrine. We suggest that the usefulness of these discussions is partially limited by failure to consider the...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2016-09-01
|
| Series: | Wildlife Society Bulletin |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.674 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850116867262251008 |
|---|---|
| author | Markus J. Peterson M. Nils Peterson Tarla Rai Peterson |
| author_facet | Markus J. Peterson M. Nils Peterson Tarla Rai Peterson |
| author_sort | Markus J. Peterson |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACT Wildlife conservation policy discussions in the United States and Canada often revolve around historical accounts of the success of wildlife management grounded in the public trust doctrine. We suggest that the usefulness of these discussions is partially limited by failure to consider the importance of wildlife “identity” rooted in freedom (i.e., how humans socially construct the “wildness” dimension of wild animals). To demonstrate the interrelations between identity and freedom, we explain that the class of subjects people care most about—partners, children, and people in general—typically should not be privately owned (i.e., chattel) because freedom (as opposed to slavery) is generally accepted as central to human identity, and its abrogation therefore degrades human identity. The degree to which this ethical argument applies to privatization of wildlife depends upon the relationship between freedom and the identity of wildlife as perceived by society. Thus, we suggest policy decisions regarding privatization of wildlife will be more accurately deliberated if society and wildlife professionals more completely considered the degree to which freedom is essential to a wild species’ identity and the degree to which that identity is inviolable. © 2016 The Wildlife Society. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-bde2ef5b861540239e54ab153a986c73 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2328-5540 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2016-09-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Wildlife Society Bulletin |
| spelling | doaj-art-bde2ef5b861540239e54ab153a986c732025-08-20T02:36:12ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402016-09-0140342843510.1002/wsb.674What makes wildlife wild? How identity may shape the public trust versus wildlife privatization debateMarkus J. Peterson0M. Nils Peterson1Tarla Rai Peterson2Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Texas at El PasoEl PasoTX79968USAFisheries and Wildlife Sciences Program, Department of ForestryNorth Carolina State UniversityBox 7646RaleighNC27695‐7646USADepartment of CommunicationUniversity of Texas at El PasoEl PasoTX79968USAABSTRACT Wildlife conservation policy discussions in the United States and Canada often revolve around historical accounts of the success of wildlife management grounded in the public trust doctrine. We suggest that the usefulness of these discussions is partially limited by failure to consider the importance of wildlife “identity” rooted in freedom (i.e., how humans socially construct the “wildness” dimension of wild animals). To demonstrate the interrelations between identity and freedom, we explain that the class of subjects people care most about—partners, children, and people in general—typically should not be privately owned (i.e., chattel) because freedom (as opposed to slavery) is generally accepted as central to human identity, and its abrogation therefore degrades human identity. The degree to which this ethical argument applies to privatization of wildlife depends upon the relationship between freedom and the identity of wildlife as perceived by society. Thus, we suggest policy decisions regarding privatization of wildlife will be more accurately deliberated if society and wildlife professionals more completely considered the degree to which freedom is essential to a wild species’ identity and the degree to which that identity is inviolable. © 2016 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.674argumentationethicsfreedomhuntingidentitylaw |
| spellingShingle | Markus J. Peterson M. Nils Peterson Tarla Rai Peterson What makes wildlife wild? How identity may shape the public trust versus wildlife privatization debate Wildlife Society Bulletin argumentation ethics freedom hunting identity law |
| title | What makes wildlife wild? How identity may shape the public trust versus wildlife privatization debate |
| title_full | What makes wildlife wild? How identity may shape the public trust versus wildlife privatization debate |
| title_fullStr | What makes wildlife wild? How identity may shape the public trust versus wildlife privatization debate |
| title_full_unstemmed | What makes wildlife wild? How identity may shape the public trust versus wildlife privatization debate |
| title_short | What makes wildlife wild? How identity may shape the public trust versus wildlife privatization debate |
| title_sort | what makes wildlife wild how identity may shape the public trust versus wildlife privatization debate |
| topic | argumentation ethics freedom hunting identity law |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.674 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT markusjpeterson whatmakeswildlifewildhowidentitymayshapethepublictrustversuswildlifeprivatizationdebate AT mnilspeterson whatmakeswildlifewildhowidentitymayshapethepublictrustversuswildlifeprivatizationdebate AT tarlaraipeterson whatmakeswildlifewildhowidentitymayshapethepublictrustversuswildlifeprivatizationdebate |