Is there a “Meditative-polemic-May”?

This article aims at displaying the results of a preliminary study on MAY and MIGHT in extraposed subject clauses where they compete with the meditative-polemic-Should. Two types of extraposed subordinate clauses will be compared, one in which MAY and MIGHT have an epistemic meaning and one in whic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maruszka Eve-Marie Meinard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin 2024-12-01
Series:LingBaW
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/LingBaW/article/view/18014
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832592744633073664
author Maruszka Eve-Marie Meinard
author_facet Maruszka Eve-Marie Meinard
author_sort Maruszka Eve-Marie Meinard
collection DOAJ
description This article aims at displaying the results of a preliminary study on MAY and MIGHT in extraposed subject clauses where they compete with the meditative-polemic-Should. Two types of extraposed subordinate clauses will be compared, one in which MAY and MIGHT have an epistemic meaning and one in which they behave like the meditative-polemic-Should. The examples extracted from Google reveal that this specific use of MAY and MIGHT is mostly found in American English, that it is mostly used in journals, and that the subclause refers to past events that could logically be expected. What is more, the subordinate clause containing this modal auxiliary reformulates the title of the article or of a paragraph. This shows that the proposition in which it is found plays a crucial role in the text, which is to provide the main information of the article once the background has been explained. We will also see that when the subject of the content clause is animate, MAY and MIGHT are less likely to have an epistemic or root reading than when the subject is inanimate. Finally, the examples reveal that this form collocates with subjective markers denoting the point of view of the subject, via the use of verbs of cognition and perception or via the progressive aspect (it’s not surprising that he may want, need, choose, be feeling…). We propose to call it the “subjective-explanatory-May”.
format Article
id doaj-art-bdd3789f49714be2a9dca947e267d82d
institution Kabale University
issn 2450-5188
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
record_format Article
series LingBaW
spelling doaj-art-bdd3789f49714be2a9dca947e267d82d2025-01-21T05:13:37ZengThe John Paul II Catholic University of LublinLingBaW2450-51882024-12-011010.31743/lingbaw.18014Is there a “Meditative-polemic-May”?Maruszka Eve-Marie Meinard0Université Lumière Lyon 2 This article aims at displaying the results of a preliminary study on MAY and MIGHT in extraposed subject clauses where they compete with the meditative-polemic-Should. Two types of extraposed subordinate clauses will be compared, one in which MAY and MIGHT have an epistemic meaning and one in which they behave like the meditative-polemic-Should. The examples extracted from Google reveal that this specific use of MAY and MIGHT is mostly found in American English, that it is mostly used in journals, and that the subclause refers to past events that could logically be expected. What is more, the subordinate clause containing this modal auxiliary reformulates the title of the article or of a paragraph. This shows that the proposition in which it is found plays a crucial role in the text, which is to provide the main information of the article once the background has been explained. We will also see that when the subject of the content clause is animate, MAY and MIGHT are less likely to have an epistemic or root reading than when the subject is inanimate. Finally, the examples reveal that this form collocates with subjective markers denoting the point of view of the subject, via the use of verbs of cognition and perception or via the progressive aspect (it’s not surprising that he may want, need, choose, be feeling…). We propose to call it the “subjective-explanatory-May”. https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/LingBaW/article/view/18014MayMightModal auxiliariesMeditative-polemic-should
spellingShingle Maruszka Eve-Marie Meinard
Is there a “Meditative-polemic-May”?
LingBaW
May
Might
Modal auxiliaries
Meditative-polemic-should
title Is there a “Meditative-polemic-May”?
title_full Is there a “Meditative-polemic-May”?
title_fullStr Is there a “Meditative-polemic-May”?
title_full_unstemmed Is there a “Meditative-polemic-May”?
title_short Is there a “Meditative-polemic-May”?
title_sort is there a meditative polemic may
topic May
Might
Modal auxiliaries
Meditative-polemic-should
url https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/LingBaW/article/view/18014
work_keys_str_mv AT maruszkaevemariemeinard isthereameditativepolemicmay