Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial of biosimilar CT-P16 and reference bevacizumab in patients with metastatic or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose: Data from the CT-P16 3.1 study demonstrated equivalent efficacy between CT-P16, a bevacizumab biosimilar, and European-approved reference bevacizumab (EU-bevacizumab) for the primary endpoint of objective response rate (ORR) during induction treatment in patients with metastatic or recurren...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zoran Andric, Fedor Moiseenko, Tamta Makharadze, Alona Oleksiienko, Eduardo Yañez Ruiz, SungHyun Kim, KeumYoung Ahn, TaeHong Park, Hana Ju, Eric Hyungseok Baek, Soonbum Kwon, IlSung Chang, SinHye Kim, HyunAh Kim, EunKyung Lee, Claire Verschraegen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:Cancer Treatment and Research Communications
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294225001066
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose: Data from the CT-P16 3.1 study demonstrated equivalent efficacy between CT-P16, a bevacizumab biosimilar, and European-approved reference bevacizumab (EU-bevacizumab) for the primary endpoint of objective response rate (ORR) during induction treatment in patients with metastatic or recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We now present long-term findings. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 3 study, patients with metastatic or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC received CT-P16 or EU-bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks; ≤6 cycles) together with paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under the curve 6.0) for 4–6 cycles during the induction period. Patients with controlled disease entered the maintenance period, continuing with CT-P16 or EU-bevacizumab as monotherapy until disease progression/intolerable toxicity. They were then followed up every 9 weeks until death or end of study. Outcomes were evaluated ≤3 years after the last patient enrollment. Results: Of 689 patients receiving CT-P16 (N = 342) or EU-bevacizumab (N = 347), 499 (72.4 %) completed the induction period (CT-P16, n = 258 [75.4 %]; EU-bevacizumab, n = 241 [69.5 %]), 466 (67.6 %) initiated the maintenance period (CT-P16, n = 239 [69.9 %]; EU-bevacizumab, n = 227 [65.4 %]), and 389 (56.5 %) entered follow-up (CT-P16, n = 190 [55.6 %]; EU-bevacizumab, n = 199 [57.3 %]). Whole study ORRs were similar for CT-P16 (45.61 % [95 % confidence interval 40.34–50.89]) and EU-bevacizumab (46.11 % [95 % confidence interval 40.86–51.35]). Response duration, time to progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival were similar. No new safety signals were detected. Conclusions: Long-term results of the CT-P16 3.1 study confirm equivalent efficacy of CT-P16 and EU-bevacizumab in patients with metastatic or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC. Trial registration number: NCT03676192. Micro abstract: Equivalent efficacy between CT-P16, a bevacizumab biosimilar, and European-approved reference bevacizumab (EU-bevacizumab) was demonstrated in a phase 3 study of patients with metastatic or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC. Long-term findings in 689 patients confirmed equivalent efficacy of CT-P16 and EU-bevacizumab; objective response rates were 45.6 % and 46.1 %, respectively. Response duration, time to progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival were also similar.
ISSN:2468-2942