Incidental Findings on Cone Beam Computed Tomography Studies outside of the Maxillofacial Skeleton

Objective. To define the presence and prevalence of incidental findings in and around the base of skull from large field-of-view CBCT of the maxillofacial region and to determine their clinical importance. Methods. Four hundred consecutive large fields of view CBCT scans viewed from January 1, 2007,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sevin Barghan, Mehrnaz Tahmasbi Arashlow, Madhu K. Nair
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9196503
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850176708755324928
author Sevin Barghan
Mehrnaz Tahmasbi Arashlow
Madhu K. Nair
author_facet Sevin Barghan
Mehrnaz Tahmasbi Arashlow
Madhu K. Nair
author_sort Sevin Barghan
collection DOAJ
description Objective. To define the presence and prevalence of incidental findings in and around the base of skull from large field-of-view CBCT of the maxillofacial region and to determine their clinical importance. Methods. Four hundred consecutive large fields of view CBCT scans viewed from January 1, 2007, to January 1, 2014, were retrospectively evaluated for incidental findings of the cervical vertebrae and surrounding structures. Findings were categorized into cervical vertebrae, intracranial, soft tissue, airway, carotid artery, lymph node, and skull base findings. Results. A total of 653 incidental findings were identified in 309 of the 400 CBCT scans. The most prevalent incidental findings were soft tissue calcifications (29.71%), followed by intracranial calcifications (27.11%), cervical vertebrae (20.06%), airway (11.49%), external carotid artery calcification (10.41%), lymph node calcification (0.77%), subcutaneous tissue calcification and calcified tendonitis of the longus colli muscle (0.3%), and skull base finding (0.15%). A significant portion of the incidental findings (31.24%) required referral, 17.76% required monitoring, and 51% did not require either. Conclusion. A comprehensive review of the CBCT images beyond the region of interest, especially incidental findings in the base of skull, cervical vertebrae, pharyngeal airway, and soft tissue, is necessary to avoid overlooking clinically significant lesions.
format Article
id doaj-art-bd7b094925d24da4947d17754e4718fe
institution OA Journals
issn 1687-8728
1687-8736
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Dentistry
spelling doaj-art-bd7b094925d24da4947d17754e4718fe2025-08-20T02:19:12ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362016-01-01201610.1155/2016/91965039196503Incidental Findings on Cone Beam Computed Tomography Studies outside of the Maxillofacial SkeletonSevin Barghan0Mehrnaz Tahmasbi Arashlow1Madhu K. Nair2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnostic Sciences, University of Florida Colleges of Dentistry and Medicine, 1395 Center Drive, Room D8-6, Gainesville, FL 32610, USADepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnostic Sciences, Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, University of Florida Colleges of Dentistry and Medicine, 1395 Center Drive, Room D8-6, Gainesville, FL 32610, USADepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnostic Sciences, University of Florida Colleges of Dentistry and Medicine, 1395 Center Drive, Room D8-6D, Gainesville, FL 32610, USAObjective. To define the presence and prevalence of incidental findings in and around the base of skull from large field-of-view CBCT of the maxillofacial region and to determine their clinical importance. Methods. Four hundred consecutive large fields of view CBCT scans viewed from January 1, 2007, to January 1, 2014, were retrospectively evaluated for incidental findings of the cervical vertebrae and surrounding structures. Findings were categorized into cervical vertebrae, intracranial, soft tissue, airway, carotid artery, lymph node, and skull base findings. Results. A total of 653 incidental findings were identified in 309 of the 400 CBCT scans. The most prevalent incidental findings were soft tissue calcifications (29.71%), followed by intracranial calcifications (27.11%), cervical vertebrae (20.06%), airway (11.49%), external carotid artery calcification (10.41%), lymph node calcification (0.77%), subcutaneous tissue calcification and calcified tendonitis of the longus colli muscle (0.3%), and skull base finding (0.15%). A significant portion of the incidental findings (31.24%) required referral, 17.76% required monitoring, and 51% did not require either. Conclusion. A comprehensive review of the CBCT images beyond the region of interest, especially incidental findings in the base of skull, cervical vertebrae, pharyngeal airway, and soft tissue, is necessary to avoid overlooking clinically significant lesions.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9196503
spellingShingle Sevin Barghan
Mehrnaz Tahmasbi Arashlow
Madhu K. Nair
Incidental Findings on Cone Beam Computed Tomography Studies outside of the Maxillofacial Skeleton
International Journal of Dentistry
title Incidental Findings on Cone Beam Computed Tomography Studies outside of the Maxillofacial Skeleton
title_full Incidental Findings on Cone Beam Computed Tomography Studies outside of the Maxillofacial Skeleton
title_fullStr Incidental Findings on Cone Beam Computed Tomography Studies outside of the Maxillofacial Skeleton
title_full_unstemmed Incidental Findings on Cone Beam Computed Tomography Studies outside of the Maxillofacial Skeleton
title_short Incidental Findings on Cone Beam Computed Tomography Studies outside of the Maxillofacial Skeleton
title_sort incidental findings on cone beam computed tomography studies outside of the maxillofacial skeleton
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9196503
work_keys_str_mv AT sevinbarghan incidentalfindingsonconebeamcomputedtomographystudiesoutsideofthemaxillofacialskeleton
AT mehrnaztahmasbiarashlow incidentalfindingsonconebeamcomputedtomographystudiesoutsideofthemaxillofacialskeleton
AT madhuknair incidentalfindingsonconebeamcomputedtomographystudiesoutsideofthemaxillofacialskeleton