Replicating the ‘seductive allure of neuroscience explanations’ effect in a classroom experiment and an online study
The ‘seductive allure of neuroscience explanations’ effect refers to the observation that superfluous neuroscience information (SNI) added to an explanation can bias judgements of information quality. We report the results of a classroom experiment to sensitize undergraduate students to that issue....
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
The Royal Society
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Royal Society Open Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.241120 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850268896603406336 |
|---|---|
| author | Pearl Amber Väth Jakob von Petersdorff Christof Neumann Roger Mundry Julia Fischer |
| author_facet | Pearl Amber Väth Jakob von Petersdorff Christof Neumann Roger Mundry Julia Fischer |
| author_sort | Pearl Amber Väth |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The ‘seductive allure of neuroscience explanations’ effect refers to the observation that superfluous neuroscience information (SNI) added to an explanation can bias judgements of information quality. We report the results of a classroom experiment to sensitize undergraduate students to that issue. In contrast to previous studies, students rated good explanations without SNI the highest. Inspired by these observations, we set out to conceptually replicate the original study using an online experiment that allowed us to directly assess the statistical interactions between explanation quality, the presence of SNI and expertise levels. In this preregistered study, participants (n = 430) with varying levels of expertise rated the quality of good and bad explanations, with or without SNI. Irrespective of the presence of SNI, participants across all expertise levels rated good explanations more favourably than bad ones. Still, the differences were surprisingly small, and the variation in rating was high. We also found a statistically significant interaction between the impact of SNI and expertise, with SNI boosting ratings mostly in participants with less expertise (p < 0.001), corroborating previous findings. Developing a curriculum that trains students to distinguish between actual explanations and ‘crap’ would ultimately also sensitize teachers and experts that produce and review scientific information. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-bd6a0bc5318b4ea6b7ae4c3f91cc04df |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2054-5703 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | The Royal Society |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Royal Society Open Science |
| spelling | doaj-art-bd6a0bc5318b4ea6b7ae4c3f91cc04df2025-08-20T01:53:19ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032024-12-01111210.1098/rsos.241120Replicating the ‘seductive allure of neuroscience explanations’ effect in a classroom experiment and an online studyPearl Amber Väth0Jakob von Petersdorff1Christof Neumann2Roger Mundry3Julia Fischer4Cognitive Ethology Laboratory, German Primate Center–Leibniz Institute for Primate Research , Göttingen, GermanyCognitive Ethology Laboratory, German Primate Center–Leibniz Institute for Primate Research , Göttingen, GermanyCognitive Ethology Laboratory, German Primate Center–Leibniz Institute for Primate Research , Göttingen, GermanyCognitive Ethology Laboratory, German Primate Center–Leibniz Institute for Primate Research , Göttingen, GermanyCognitive Ethology Laboratory, German Primate Center–Leibniz Institute for Primate Research , Göttingen, GermanyThe ‘seductive allure of neuroscience explanations’ effect refers to the observation that superfluous neuroscience information (SNI) added to an explanation can bias judgements of information quality. We report the results of a classroom experiment to sensitize undergraduate students to that issue. In contrast to previous studies, students rated good explanations without SNI the highest. Inspired by these observations, we set out to conceptually replicate the original study using an online experiment that allowed us to directly assess the statistical interactions between explanation quality, the presence of SNI and expertise levels. In this preregistered study, participants (n = 430) with varying levels of expertise rated the quality of good and bad explanations, with or without SNI. Irrespective of the presence of SNI, participants across all expertise levels rated good explanations more favourably than bad ones. Still, the differences were surprisingly small, and the variation in rating was high. We also found a statistically significant interaction between the impact of SNI and expertise, with SNI boosting ratings mostly in participants with less expertise (p < 0.001), corroborating previous findings. Developing a curriculum that trains students to distinguish between actual explanations and ‘crap’ would ultimately also sensitize teachers and experts that produce and review scientific information.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.241120classroom experimentneurosciencereplicationseductive allurescience communication |
| spellingShingle | Pearl Amber Väth Jakob von Petersdorff Christof Neumann Roger Mundry Julia Fischer Replicating the ‘seductive allure of neuroscience explanations’ effect in a classroom experiment and an online study Royal Society Open Science classroom experiment neuroscience replication seductive allure science communication |
| title | Replicating the ‘seductive allure of neuroscience explanations’ effect in a classroom experiment and an online study |
| title_full | Replicating the ‘seductive allure of neuroscience explanations’ effect in a classroom experiment and an online study |
| title_fullStr | Replicating the ‘seductive allure of neuroscience explanations’ effect in a classroom experiment and an online study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Replicating the ‘seductive allure of neuroscience explanations’ effect in a classroom experiment and an online study |
| title_short | Replicating the ‘seductive allure of neuroscience explanations’ effect in a classroom experiment and an online study |
| title_sort | replicating the seductive allure of neuroscience explanations effect in a classroom experiment and an online study |
| topic | classroom experiment neuroscience replication seductive allure science communication |
| url | https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.241120 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pearlambervath replicatingtheseductiveallureofneuroscienceexplanationseffectinaclassroomexperimentandanonlinestudy AT jakobvonpetersdorff replicatingtheseductiveallureofneuroscienceexplanationseffectinaclassroomexperimentandanonlinestudy AT christofneumann replicatingtheseductiveallureofneuroscienceexplanationseffectinaclassroomexperimentandanonlinestudy AT rogermundry replicatingtheseductiveallureofneuroscienceexplanationseffectinaclassroomexperimentandanonlinestudy AT juliafischer replicatingtheseductiveallureofneuroscienceexplanationseffectinaclassroomexperimentandanonlinestudy |