The impact of Daylight Saving Time on dog activity.

While most studies on Daylight Saving Time (DST) focus on human sleep and well-being, there is a dearth of understanding of how this sudden, human-mitigated change affects the routines of companion animals. The objective of this study was to assess how DST influenced the morning activity pattern of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lavania Nagendran, Ming Fei Li, David R Samson, Lauren Schroeder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317028
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832540207256174592
author Lavania Nagendran
Ming Fei Li
David R Samson
Lauren Schroeder
author_facet Lavania Nagendran
Ming Fei Li
David R Samson
Lauren Schroeder
author_sort Lavania Nagendran
collection DOAJ
description While most studies on Daylight Saving Time (DST) focus on human sleep and well-being, there is a dearth of understanding of how this sudden, human-mitigated change affects the routines of companion animals. The objective of this study was to assess how DST influenced the morning activity pattern of dogs (Canis familiaris). We used accelerometers to record activity in 25 sled dogs and 29 caregiver-companion dog dyads located in or near Ontario, Canada during the Fall Back time shift. We looked at morning onset activity based on sunrise time (both groups), handler arrival time (sled dogs), and caregiver Got-up Time (companion dogs), and compared pre-DST measures with the three days following DST. We found that sled dogs were less active around sunrise in all post-DST days compared to pre-DST, as sunrise coincided with handler arrival time before DST but not after. Companion dogs showed no change in morning activity based on sunrise times before and after DST. On the Sunday of DST, sled dogs were more active before handlers arrived, but their activity returned to pre-DST levels in the following two days. Caregiver and companion dog activities did not change on the day of DST. After DST, caregivers woke up earlier on weekdays, but companion dogs maintained their pre-DST activity patterns. Overall, we found that sled dogs took one day to adjust to a change in handler arrival time yet neither companion dogs nor their caregivers showed any morning activity difference after the Fall Back DST transition. In summary, our findings highlight the importance of flexible routines and gradual changes in helping dogs adjust to abrupt schedule modifications, offering valuable insights for optimizing dog care practices during time shifts.
format Article
id doaj-art-bd55e1119fa14125b13036eaf4057562
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-bd55e1119fa14125b13036eaf40575622025-02-05T05:31:54ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01201e031702810.1371/journal.pone.0317028The impact of Daylight Saving Time on dog activity.Lavania NagendranMing Fei LiDavid R SamsonLauren SchroederWhile most studies on Daylight Saving Time (DST) focus on human sleep and well-being, there is a dearth of understanding of how this sudden, human-mitigated change affects the routines of companion animals. The objective of this study was to assess how DST influenced the morning activity pattern of dogs (Canis familiaris). We used accelerometers to record activity in 25 sled dogs and 29 caregiver-companion dog dyads located in or near Ontario, Canada during the Fall Back time shift. We looked at morning onset activity based on sunrise time (both groups), handler arrival time (sled dogs), and caregiver Got-up Time (companion dogs), and compared pre-DST measures with the three days following DST. We found that sled dogs were less active around sunrise in all post-DST days compared to pre-DST, as sunrise coincided with handler arrival time before DST but not after. Companion dogs showed no change in morning activity based on sunrise times before and after DST. On the Sunday of DST, sled dogs were more active before handlers arrived, but their activity returned to pre-DST levels in the following two days. Caregiver and companion dog activities did not change on the day of DST. After DST, caregivers woke up earlier on weekdays, but companion dogs maintained their pre-DST activity patterns. Overall, we found that sled dogs took one day to adjust to a change in handler arrival time yet neither companion dogs nor their caregivers showed any morning activity difference after the Fall Back DST transition. In summary, our findings highlight the importance of flexible routines and gradual changes in helping dogs adjust to abrupt schedule modifications, offering valuable insights for optimizing dog care practices during time shifts.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317028
spellingShingle Lavania Nagendran
Ming Fei Li
David R Samson
Lauren Schroeder
The impact of Daylight Saving Time on dog activity.
PLoS ONE
title The impact of Daylight Saving Time on dog activity.
title_full The impact of Daylight Saving Time on dog activity.
title_fullStr The impact of Daylight Saving Time on dog activity.
title_full_unstemmed The impact of Daylight Saving Time on dog activity.
title_short The impact of Daylight Saving Time on dog activity.
title_sort impact of daylight saving time on dog activity
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317028
work_keys_str_mv AT lavanianagendran theimpactofdaylightsavingtimeondogactivity
AT mingfeili theimpactofdaylightsavingtimeondogactivity
AT davidrsamson theimpactofdaylightsavingtimeondogactivity
AT laurenschroeder theimpactofdaylightsavingtimeondogactivity
AT lavanianagendran impactofdaylightsavingtimeondogactivity
AT mingfeili impactofdaylightsavingtimeondogactivity
AT davidrsamson impactofdaylightsavingtimeondogactivity
AT laurenschroeder impactofdaylightsavingtimeondogactivity