Platelet concentrates in diabetic foot ulcers: A comparative review of PRP, PRF, and CGF with case insights

Platelet concentrates in diabetic foot ulcers: A comparative review of PRP, PRF, and CGF with case insights

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are severe complications of diabetes, often leading to chronic wounds, amputations, and increased mortality risk. Platelet concentrates (PCs)—natural biomaterials utilized in regenerative medicine—have garnered attention for their capacity to enhance tissue repair and wou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mengling Yang, Bo Deng, Wei Hao, Xiaoyan Jiang, Yan Chen, Min Wang, Yi Yuan, Meirong Chen, Xiaohua Wu, Chenzhen Du, David G. Armstrong, Lian Guo, Wuquan Deng, Hongyan Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-03-01
Series:Regenerative Therapy
Subjects:
Diabetic foot ulcers
Platelet concentrates
Platelet-rich plasma
Platelet-rich fibrin
Concentrated growth factors
Wound healing
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352320425000318
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are severe complications of diabetes, often leading to chronic wounds, amputations, and increased mortality risk. Platelet concentrates (PCs)—natural biomaterials utilized in regenerative medicine—have garnered attention for their capacity to enhance tissue repair and wound healing. This study reviews the preparation methods, biological mechanisms, and clinical efficacy of three generations of PCs: platelet-rich plasma (PRP), platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), and concentrated growth factors (CGF). Comparative analysis reveals that PRP, the first generation, provides abundant growth factors but relies on anticoagulants, which may hinder fibrin formation and tissue adhesion. PRF, as the second generation, eliminates anticoagulants, forming a fibrin matrix that sustains growth factor release and enhances cell migration. CGF, the latest advancement, employs refined centrifugation to achieve higher growth factor concentrations and a denser fibrin matrix, accelerating tissue regeneration. Case series results demonstrated superior wound healing outcomes with CGF, including faster epithelialization and reduced healing time compared to PRP and PRF. These findings underscore CGF's potential as the most effective PC for managing DFUs, supporting its broader clinical adoption in advanced wound care.
ISSN:2352-3204

Similar Items