Inequities in childhood cancer research: A scoping review

An integral part of understanding and then designing programs to reduce childhood cancer inequities includes adequate representation of people with cancer in research, including children. A scoping review was carried out to understand how cancer research is oriented toward inequities and to identify...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jean Hunleth, Sarah Burack, Lindsey Kaufman, Caroline Mohrmann, Thembekile Shato, Eric Wiedenman, Janet Njelesani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-12-01
Series:EJC Paediatric Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X24000308
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850061307946991616
author Jean Hunleth
Sarah Burack
Lindsey Kaufman
Caroline Mohrmann
Thembekile Shato
Eric Wiedenman
Janet Njelesani
author_facet Jean Hunleth
Sarah Burack
Lindsey Kaufman
Caroline Mohrmann
Thembekile Shato
Eric Wiedenman
Janet Njelesani
author_sort Jean Hunleth
collection DOAJ
description An integral part of understanding and then designing programs to reduce childhood cancer inequities includes adequate representation of people with cancer in research, including children. A scoping review was carried out to understand how cancer research is oriented toward inequities and to identify who has participated in childhood qualitative cancer research. A systematic search identified 119 qualitative studies that met inclusion criteria, with most studies taking place in high-income countries (n=84). Overall, data were lacking on social determinants of health at multiple levels—structural, household, child, and guardian. Only 29 studies reported on race and/or ethnicity, with the majority of those including predominantly or all white children. Six articles included socioeconomic information, and across most articles, attention was absent to the financial ramifications of cancer care. Limited reporting of sociodemographics highlights a broader issue of neglecting key demographics and social factors that contribute to inequities.
format Article
id doaj-art-bd038c1a0ef341a9a8e79acfb7268dba
institution DOAJ
issn 2772-610X
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series EJC Paediatric Oncology
spelling doaj-art-bd038c1a0ef341a9a8e79acfb7268dba2025-08-20T02:50:16ZengElsevierEJC Paediatric Oncology2772-610X2024-12-01410017110.1016/j.ejcped.2024.100171Inequities in childhood cancer research: A scoping reviewJean Hunleth0Sarah Burack1Lindsey Kaufman2Caroline Mohrmann3Thembekile Shato4Eric Wiedenman5Janet Njelesani6Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA; Correspondence to: 600 S. Taylor Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, USADepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, USADivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, USADepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA; Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control and Prevention Research Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USAPhysician Learning Program, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, CanadaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, New York University, New York, USAAn integral part of understanding and then designing programs to reduce childhood cancer inequities includes adequate representation of people with cancer in research, including children. A scoping review was carried out to understand how cancer research is oriented toward inequities and to identify who has participated in childhood qualitative cancer research. A systematic search identified 119 qualitative studies that met inclusion criteria, with most studies taking place in high-income countries (n=84). Overall, data were lacking on social determinants of health at multiple levels—structural, household, child, and guardian. Only 29 studies reported on race and/or ethnicity, with the majority of those including predominantly or all white children. Six articles included socioeconomic information, and across most articles, attention was absent to the financial ramifications of cancer care. Limited reporting of sociodemographics highlights a broader issue of neglecting key demographics and social factors that contribute to inequities.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X24000308Childhood cancerPediatric cancerQualitative researchCancer disparitiesScoping review
spellingShingle Jean Hunleth
Sarah Burack
Lindsey Kaufman
Caroline Mohrmann
Thembekile Shato
Eric Wiedenman
Janet Njelesani
Inequities in childhood cancer research: A scoping review
EJC Paediatric Oncology
Childhood cancer
Pediatric cancer
Qualitative research
Cancer disparities
Scoping review
title Inequities in childhood cancer research: A scoping review
title_full Inequities in childhood cancer research: A scoping review
title_fullStr Inequities in childhood cancer research: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Inequities in childhood cancer research: A scoping review
title_short Inequities in childhood cancer research: A scoping review
title_sort inequities in childhood cancer research a scoping review
topic Childhood cancer
Pediatric cancer
Qualitative research
Cancer disparities
Scoping review
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X24000308
work_keys_str_mv AT jeanhunleth inequitiesinchildhoodcancerresearchascopingreview
AT sarahburack inequitiesinchildhoodcancerresearchascopingreview
AT lindseykaufman inequitiesinchildhoodcancerresearchascopingreview
AT carolinemohrmann inequitiesinchildhoodcancerresearchascopingreview
AT thembekileshato inequitiesinchildhoodcancerresearchascopingreview
AT ericwiedenman inequitiesinchildhoodcancerresearchascopingreview
AT janetnjelesani inequitiesinchildhoodcancerresearchascopingreview