Galvanic Skin Response and Photoplethysmography for Stress Recognition Using Machine Learning and Wearable Sensors

This study investigates stress recognition using galvanic skin response (GSR) and photoplethysmography (PPG) data and machine learning, with a new focus on air raid sirens as a stressor. It bridges laboratory and real-world conditions and highlights the reliability of wearable sensors in dynamic, hi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alina Nechyporenko, Marcus Frohme, Yaroslav Strelchuk, Vladyslav Omelchenko, Vitaliy Gargin, Liudmyla Ishchenko, Victoriia Alekseeva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-12-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/24/11997
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850059545579094016
author Alina Nechyporenko
Marcus Frohme
Yaroslav Strelchuk
Vladyslav Omelchenko
Vitaliy Gargin
Liudmyla Ishchenko
Victoriia Alekseeva
author_facet Alina Nechyporenko
Marcus Frohme
Yaroslav Strelchuk
Vladyslav Omelchenko
Vitaliy Gargin
Liudmyla Ishchenko
Victoriia Alekseeva
author_sort Alina Nechyporenko
collection DOAJ
description This study investigates stress recognition using galvanic skin response (GSR) and photoplethysmography (PPG) data and machine learning, with a new focus on air raid sirens as a stressor. It bridges laboratory and real-world conditions and highlights the reliability of wearable sensors in dynamic, high-stress environments such as war and conflict zones. The study involves 37 participants (20 men, 17 women), aged 20–30, who had not previously heard an air raid siren. A 70 dB “S-40 electric siren” (400–450 Hz) was delivered via headphones. The protocol included a 5 min resting period, followed by 3 min “no-stress” phase, followed by 3 min “stress” phase, and finally a 3 min recovery phase. GSR and PPG signals were recorded using Shimmer 3 GSR+ sensors on the fingers and earlobes. A single session was conducted to avoid sensitization. The workflow includes signal preprocessing to remove artifacts, feature extraction, feature selection, and application of different machine learning models to classify the “stress “and “no-stress” states. As a result, the best classification performance was shown by the k-Nearest Neighbors model, achieving 0.833 accuracy. This was achieved by using a particular combination of heart rate variability (HRV) and GSR features, which can be considered as new indicators of siren-induced stress.
format Article
id doaj-art-bcff341aa04b4f9f8c36e0ebed25933f
institution DOAJ
issn 2076-3417
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj-art-bcff341aa04b4f9f8c36e0ebed25933f2025-08-20T02:50:52ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172024-12-0114241199710.3390/app142411997Galvanic Skin Response and Photoplethysmography for Stress Recognition Using Machine Learning and Wearable SensorsAlina Nechyporenko0Marcus Frohme1Yaroslav Strelchuk2Vladyslav Omelchenko3Vitaliy Gargin4Liudmyla Ishchenko5Victoriia Alekseeva6Division Molecular Biotechnology and Functional Genomics, Technical University of Applied Sciences Wildau, 1 Hochschulring, 15745 Wildau, GermanyDivision Molecular Biotechnology and Functional Genomics, Technical University of Applied Sciences Wildau, 1 Hochschulring, 15745 Wildau, GermanyDivision Molecular Biotechnology and Functional Genomics, Technical University of Applied Sciences Wildau, 1 Hochschulring, 15745 Wildau, GermanyDivision Molecular Biotechnology and Functional Genomics, Technical University of Applied Sciences Wildau, 1 Hochschulring, 15745 Wildau, GermanyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Pathological Anatomy, Kharkiv National Medical University, 4 Nauky Avenue, 61000 Kharkiv, UkraineDivision Molecular Biotechnology and Functional Genomics, Technical University of Applied Sciences Wildau, 1 Hochschulring, 15745 Wildau, GermanyDivision Molecular Biotechnology and Functional Genomics, Technical University of Applied Sciences Wildau, 1 Hochschulring, 15745 Wildau, GermanyThis study investigates stress recognition using galvanic skin response (GSR) and photoplethysmography (PPG) data and machine learning, with a new focus on air raid sirens as a stressor. It bridges laboratory and real-world conditions and highlights the reliability of wearable sensors in dynamic, high-stress environments such as war and conflict zones. The study involves 37 participants (20 men, 17 women), aged 20–30, who had not previously heard an air raid siren. A 70 dB “S-40 electric siren” (400–450 Hz) was delivered via headphones. The protocol included a 5 min resting period, followed by 3 min “no-stress” phase, followed by 3 min “stress” phase, and finally a 3 min recovery phase. GSR and PPG signals were recorded using Shimmer 3 GSR+ sensors on the fingers and earlobes. A single session was conducted to avoid sensitization. The workflow includes signal preprocessing to remove artifacts, feature extraction, feature selection, and application of different machine learning models to classify the “stress “and “no-stress” states. As a result, the best classification performance was shown by the k-Nearest Neighbors model, achieving 0.833 accuracy. This was achieved by using a particular combination of heart rate variability (HRV) and GSR features, which can be considered as new indicators of siren-induced stress.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/24/11997galvanic skin responsephotoplethysmographystressmachine learning
spellingShingle Alina Nechyporenko
Marcus Frohme
Yaroslav Strelchuk
Vladyslav Omelchenko
Vitaliy Gargin
Liudmyla Ishchenko
Victoriia Alekseeva
Galvanic Skin Response and Photoplethysmography for Stress Recognition Using Machine Learning and Wearable Sensors
Applied Sciences
galvanic skin response
photoplethysmography
stress
machine learning
title Galvanic Skin Response and Photoplethysmography for Stress Recognition Using Machine Learning and Wearable Sensors
title_full Galvanic Skin Response and Photoplethysmography for Stress Recognition Using Machine Learning and Wearable Sensors
title_fullStr Galvanic Skin Response and Photoplethysmography for Stress Recognition Using Machine Learning and Wearable Sensors
title_full_unstemmed Galvanic Skin Response and Photoplethysmography for Stress Recognition Using Machine Learning and Wearable Sensors
title_short Galvanic Skin Response and Photoplethysmography for Stress Recognition Using Machine Learning and Wearable Sensors
title_sort galvanic skin response and photoplethysmography for stress recognition using machine learning and wearable sensors
topic galvanic skin response
photoplethysmography
stress
machine learning
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/24/11997
work_keys_str_mv AT alinanechyporenko galvanicskinresponseandphotoplethysmographyforstressrecognitionusingmachinelearningandwearablesensors
AT marcusfrohme galvanicskinresponseandphotoplethysmographyforstressrecognitionusingmachinelearningandwearablesensors
AT yaroslavstrelchuk galvanicskinresponseandphotoplethysmographyforstressrecognitionusingmachinelearningandwearablesensors
AT vladyslavomelchenko galvanicskinresponseandphotoplethysmographyforstressrecognitionusingmachinelearningandwearablesensors
AT vitaliygargin galvanicskinresponseandphotoplethysmographyforstressrecognitionusingmachinelearningandwearablesensors
AT liudmylaishchenko galvanicskinresponseandphotoplethysmographyforstressrecognitionusingmachinelearningandwearablesensors
AT victoriiaalekseeva galvanicskinresponseandphotoplethysmographyforstressrecognitionusingmachinelearningandwearablesensors