“It’s messy and it’s massive”: How has the open science debate developed in the post-COVID era? [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the global adoption of open science (OS) practices. However, as the pandemic subsides, the debate around OS continues to evolve. This study investigates how the pandemic has shaped the OS discourse and identifies key issues and challenges. Interviews were conducted...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Natascha Chtena, Juan Pablo Alperin, Alice Fleerackers, Andrew Cox, Stephen Pinfield, Pamela Abbott, Melanie T Benson Marshall |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2025-08-01
|
| Series: | F1000Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://f1000research.com/articles/14-500/v2 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
“It’s messy and it’s massive”: How has the open science debate developed in the post-COVID era? [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Natascha Chtena, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
An international, cross-sectional survey of preprint attitudes among biomedical researchers [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Valerie Chow, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Towards an inclusive Open Science: examining EDI and public participation in policy documents across Europe and the Americas
by: Natascha Chtena, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01) -
Evolutionary Game Research on Stakeholder Decision-Making in Preprint Platform
by: LI Huimiao, NIU Xiaohong, MA Zhuo, GUO Mohan
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Open science in energy research [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 4 approved with reservations, 3 not approved]
by: Felipe Van de Sande Araujo, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)